topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday April 16, 2024, 1:05 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - JavaJones [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2]
26
Hello mighty DonationCoder community! I beseech you to turn your powerful and all knowing gaze toward this simple problem which presently confounds me.

I find myself the sole, voluntary IT support for a friend's small business, a simple 2 person floral design studio and flower shop. They mostly do weddings and corporate clients, with infrequent in-person sales, and so far no online sales. They use Quickbooks Pro 2010 and have 1 desktop and 1 laptop system they use for all their work, both running Windows 7.

When a previous laptop recently crashed, I found myself waste-deep in a tangle of horribly organized documents and inconsistent business practices while recovering their data. I felt I had to do something about this. So, what they need is a simple, easy to use system for managing customer relationships, sales, simple marketing efforts, appointments and tasks, etc.. Preferably the system should have all those parts integrated, and also integrate with their existing Quickbooks data. Ideally it would also be relatively inexpensive as they are a small business without much money to spend at the moment; in fact they're in a bit of a financial pickle, though they're managing to stay afloat. They desperately need more customers though and providing tools to let them more easily run marketing campaigns is a part of this whole project.

So far I have spent a lot of time looking at dedicated CRM applications and systems like SalesForce, SugarCRM, etc. I've also looked at separate components like Google Apps for contacts, docs, and calendaring, mailing list tools for marketing, etc. The problem with the full-blown CRM systems is they seem way too complicated. They need something that replaces a bunch of separate Word and Excel docs in a unified system (e.g. imagine trying to search for past customer transaction info if your receipts are all separate Word docs, many of which have different formatting). So the Google Docs approach is also non-ideal. It solves some of the problems, but doesn't really focus on customer relationship management at all. They'll be using Gmail and Google Calendar regardless, but as far as building a customer database with good info, and then leveraging that database for ongoing marketing, they're lost with current tools. Ideally it *would* be an online tool like this so they could access it anywhere, even from a mobile device (the manager has a Blackberry), but a desktop Windows app would suffice if price and features were a better fit. They have web hosting and I can install any web apps for them.

In searching for something that could work for them it really struck me how difficult the world of the small business owner is, especially if they're not super technically minded. They are in a strange limbo world where they're big enough to want dedicated tools to keep them organized and, especially, to help them *grow* their business. At the same time they're not big enough or technically savvy enough to really make use of something like SalesForce or other complex CRM packages, nor can they necessarily afford the versions they might need. Just as an example, they want to start email marketing, which seems like a virtually essential thing these days. The version of SalesForce that has this integrated is $65/mo per user (potentially $130/mo if they both need access), which seems like relatively small potatoes I admit, but is still a lot considering what they're doing now is free. ;)

I'm willing to try to sell them on the financial benefits of better organization and marketing tools (if they get just 1 additional customer from it, it could arguably pay for itself). Still they are somewhat in a panicky state as far as finances go right now, as I mentioned.

Any help and info greatly appreciated!

- Oshyan

27
Headline is copied from the source site, I couldn't think of anything better, though it doesn't totally describe what I hope this topic can discuss. First, here's the link, to a "game" that helps teach users how to use Microsoft Office:
http://lostgarden.co...ing-office-into.html

I haven't actually tried it as I only have OpenOffice on this system, but I personally found this concept fascinating. It's true that people will go through great lengths, endless repetition, and much more that would otherwise be out of the question, all for simple game rewards - higher points, more items collected, higher levels, etc. So what about applying these concepts to application usage tutorials, even going so far as creating games to teach an application? I think the idea is very promising. Perhaps this first incarnation doesn't get everything right, but the core point - the value of the game-inspired reward mechanism for learning and practice - seems very important to me.

Hopefully some app developers will weigh in on this, as well as users. Does anyone know of any other examples of this kind of thing?

Capture-721897.JPG

- Oshyan

28
Developer's Corner / A story about "real programmers"...
« on: March 03, 2010, 02:22 PM »
Hopefully some of you haven't read this before. It is apparently an old classic on the Internets, but I hadn't read it until today. I'm not a developer myself, but I'm in IT, so I think I "get it" enough to appreciate what this guy could do (and how crazy it is :D).

http://www.jargon.ne...t/TheStoryofMel.html

- Oshyan

29
Just read about this on Betanews today:
http://www.betanews....a-testers/1267037365
In short, it appears to be a system you embed in your application that collects technical and usage info for product research and testing purposes. It sounds a lot like the annoying things that some software apps (and Windows itself) do from time to time, e.g. "Report this bug to Microsoft", but for the average software user maybe that's more comforting that annoying (as it is to me).

I don't think I'd be inclined to include this in any software I had a hand in, but I thought it might be worth some discussion and consideration here at least. Does this data seem useful to you as a developer? If so, is the use of such a system an appropriate way to get it? Would you feel comfortable including this in your software?

- Oshyan

30
Living Room / People are really (really, really) stupid
« on: February 19, 2010, 04:53 PM »
From Betanews: "Last week, hundreds of Facebook users who type "Facebook" into their Google search bar rather than use the URL in the address bar were routed to a ReadWriteWeb article instead of Facebook when Google temporarily shuffled the search rankings. What followed is one of the most tragically hilarious comment threads of all time."
http://www.readwrite...r_one_true_login.php

WOW. Just.... wow. OK, so the method of typing in a site's name or even URL into Google to find it, I get that it's common, and maybe it's not totally retarded. And I guess muscle memory or simple habit trains people to click that first link that comes up in their search engine when they do this, and they just trust it'll be the right thing when they do. That's all well and good, it's not a sign of the stupidity apocalypse.

What shocks me about this is 1: 100's or even 1000's of people didn't even think to go back and check the search engine's results that they clicked on, they just assumed the site they went to was Facebook and it had undergone a complete and total redesign despite 2: the URL in the address bar not being anywhere close to right. Worse still, when they did weigh in with their question, opinion, comment it 3: was universally retarded, e.g. "wtf is this bullshttttttttttt all about. can i get n plzzzzzzzzz".

No wonder so many people get taken in by Facebook scams and other online hazards. I am sad for the future of mankind.  :(

- Oshyan

31
Living Room / Antivirus companies support virus writers?
« on: February 12, 2010, 05:35 PM »
OK, the headline is somewhat sensationalized. Sorry, I couldn't resist. :D I know it sounds crazy, and believe me I don't buy into this, at least not until I see real evidence. But I found some of the points in this blog post to be interesting, if not entirely "compelling" as he claims:
http://dmytry.blogsp...es-main-driving.html

I know the subject has been discussed before; I've even seen it mentioned here on DC in past AV discussions I think. It wouldn't be the first time unethical corporate behavior was responsible for billions of unnecessary spending by consumers. And with the ready availability of obviously less scrupulous off-shore development resources, easily contracted relatively anonymously, it seems all too easy for this to be happening. As opposed to the situation with other businesses like the car tire slashing example given in the post above, where the barrier to accomplishing the stated goal of increasing demand for the product/service would be much higher. Here it's relatively low. Pay some off-shore contractor $10/hr to write virus variants with existing kits = millions of viruses for pennies a piece.

It sounds crazy, but really what's the barrier to this? Legality and morality. If you don't think you'll get caught, legality doesn't matter, and that really seems to be the case with a lot of bad corporate behavior, from "cooking the books" to toxic waste disposal, and much more, some a lot more (physically) harmful than viruses. And morality? Well, since when have corporations had morality? Hmm...

- Oshyan

32
I must now call upon the great DonationCoder wizards to help me pull off a birthday present for my girlfriend. :D

Quick version: I need a little utility that runs resident and lets me redirect clicks (or any "open" commands in the file manager) for *any* file of specific types (multiple types) to *one* specific file. In other words if someone clicks on bob.avi, john.mkv, or jo.mp4, I could redirect all of those to me.mov. I imagine doing it by setting file extension wildcards on a redirect list, e.g. "*.mkv, *.avi, *.mp4", etc. and then a field to set the file to redirect to. Also note: this need to work on Win 7.

Some background for why I need this: for the last several years my friends and I have made a tribute video to my girlfriend which we premiere at her birthday, generally to her surprise. This will be our 3rd video, so she's probably expecting it by now, and we want to try to keep it surprising. One of the dead giveaways is the big reveal moment, "hey, let's put a video on", but on this particular night we know she plans to watch some movies anyway. So my idea is to let her pick from the list of movie files on the computer, and she needs to be able to pick *any* movie so it's not obvious that we're rigging it, and then whatever she picks it actually opens the movie we have made.

Now the idea could be made broader, using complex naming wildcards or whatnot (i.e. more than just *). All I need is to match the file extension, but a more flexible tool would be more likely to have use for others.

And this does have possible functional use, albeit arguable. Let's say you have a computer that you let your kids use and you don't want to allow them to open and/or mess with important files, like system files (yes, protectable via "hide system files" in large part, but that's less convenient and selective). So you add *.SYS, *.DAT, etc. to the filter and turn the app on when you let them on the computer. If they try to open any of those files you can redirect to an app or word doc that says "sorry, you shouldn't be opening this" or whatever. Maybe protect the disable/exit of the app with a password. There are certainly other possible uses too...

Forgive me if this has already been done, or if the way to do it is obvious. All solutions and related info are appreciated.

- Oshyan

33
I found an interesting list of things removed from Windows 7 (vs. Vista - the list of things removed in Vista vs. XP is a lot longer :D). I thought it might be useful to see a concrete list and talk about what things we might miss (or are glad are gone!). So here's the list, to get started (and I'm sure it will grow with time):
http://en.wikipedia....removed_in_Windows_7

I will tell you the biggest thing I miss is the more full functionality of the status bar in Explorer. Why they removed features like showing the size of folder contents I just don't know! Especially with the supposedly more advanced indexing Win7 now has.

- Oshyan

34
Hello again everyone. It's been, um... 2 years since I posted here? I missed this place. :D I hope I'll have time again to stick around, we'll see. But for now I need this magical community's rabid genius to bend to my will and find me something that I don't think exists. If you just want to read my software request, skip down to the bold bit below. ;)

Right, so the quick back story is I'm working at a software publisher, on a complicated piece of software, and it's part of my job to handle documentation. Or at least to manage it. I'm sorry to say I hate doing it, it's my least favorite part of the job.

One of the most laborious parts of it involves documenting the whole UI and the many unique "objects" in the software. For this task I've been using Dr. Explain, a frequent feature on this forum last I was here. I'm usually a free/open source software kind of guy, but this one I bought. It seemed very unique at the time; still is from what I know. And overall it's been a pretty good solution, despite some quirks and limitations. The automatic screenshot capture and labeling of UI elements is priceless for a job like this. I'll show you why: http://www.planetsid...uk/docs/tg2/noderef/

The problem is it's clearly not finished, and there's a long way to go. Dr. Explain did half the job quickly, capturing and labeling all the controls. Thumbs up there. But now there is scads of writing to do. And I don't want to do it alone. The problem has been that I am really the bottle neck. I'm not the only one who knows the software, not even the one who necessarily knows it best. Others on the team certainly know particular areas better than I and could directly contribute their expertise... if only they could edit the thing directly.

Shuttling around Dr. Explain files just isn't feasible. Nevermind that one of the devs mostly runs on a Mac, it's just not a functional way to collaborate. Not to mention that I've frankly found Dr. Explain to be a bit cumbersome and unstable with files the size I've got going here (over 100 nodes documented, each with upwards of 50 controls, plus the rest of the UI).

So, finally, to the software request: Basically what I want is a collaborative, online help authoring system, similar to a Wiki or knowledgebase, but with a decent WYSIWYG editor and - here's where it gets tricky - somehow the ability to reference specific UI controls on screenshots of parts of the UI. The whole mouseover graphic box thing that Dr. Explain does isn't necessary - normal tooltips/mouseover effects would be fine - but I do want the control to link to its explanatory text easily and quickly. Maybe even a nice lightbox effect with pop-up explanation.

Basically I want Dr. Explain, but online and collaborative. Ideally this would also include the ability to capture UI controls like Dr. Explain does. The grand vision would see it done as a Java applet that would work cross-platform. Or, if not that, then a sophisticated browser plugin or web-based app, like Techsmith's Jing. But I think that's going a bit far.

Anyway, do-able? Does it perhaps already exist even? If it doesn't, heck I'd even pay a decent sum to kick start development. I think this thing could be useful to a lot of people.

Feel free to reply if you know of a solution or if you don't! Even posting to say you too would find this useful would be helpful.

Thanks everyone!

- Oshyan

35
Living Room / Pranking a telemarketer - priceless!
« on: October 24, 2006, 09:52 PM »
http://howtoprankate...emarketer.ytmnd.com/

This is fantastic. I wonder if it's legal to imply this kind of stuff though. :P

- Oshyan

36
Living Room / My PhotoBlog
« on: October 22, 2006, 08:58 PM »
I've finally gotten around to setting up a photoblog - something I've been contemplating (along with a regular blog) for ages now. So far there's just 3 images there and I'm sticking to the 1 image a day format for the time being. I hope to be focusing on the better of my new images, but if I just don't have time to shoot something good on a given day I'll resort to my extensive archives. ;)

http://photoblog.oshyan.com/

I'm not sure how interesting this will be in the long-run, but I plan to stick with it as long as I can. I hope some of you will be along for the ride. To get an idea of my previous photo work have a look at http://oshyan.ashund...mbnails.php?album=10

Comments, criticism, and all other feedback are always appreciated! And remember, the photoblog will change every day, so come back often if you like what you see. Or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. :)

- Oshyan

37
Here's the latest in the month-long controversy surrounding Microsoft's unwillingness to allow 3rd parties (such as antivirus providers) to access the Vista kernel:

McAfee said Wednesday that Microsoft has failed to keep its promises, and has not delivered the necessary code and instructions to access the core of the Windows Vista operating system. Microsoft promised the European Commission it would do so last week.

The company is the second in as many days to claim Microsoft is not providing the APIs needed by its security partners. On Tuesday, Sunbelt Software called the company's announcement about sharing APIs was a "red herring" to fool the press.

http://www.betanews....vide_Code/1161180764

Now the first time I read about this a few weeks ago my first thought was the same as Microsoft's position - if A/V providers can't access the kernel due to protections, shouldn't that protection be kept in place to prevent issues, not opened up potentially causing them? Sure you could argue there are bound to be vulnerabilities in it, but if the problem is something Symantec can solve with downloadable updates, then it's certainly something MS could solve in the same way. It seems to me then the proper way to deal with this would be for companies like Sunbelt, etc. to report any discovered vulnerabilities to MS for fixing, *not* to force MS to open things up to potentially more issues. Seems like Mcaffee and the rest are just crying over sour grapes. MS takes steps to increase security and it *may* slightly hurt their business model - must we now be mandated to insecurity just to protect a company's "right to profit"? This reminds me of the RIAA. ;)

I did some searching here and didn't see much discussion this issue, but it's something I'm really interested to hear other (non-Betanews - e.g. informed and reasonable :D) opinions on. So, thoughts and comments? Is MS in the right here; are Mcaffee and the rest just being bullies to protect their business models? Or is MS just trying to provide false hope of real security and we *need* 3rd parties to go poking around in the kernel to make it truly secure?

- Oshyan

38
General Software Discussion / Jetico firewall tops in "leaktest"?
« on: October 18, 2006, 02:03 AM »
I was surprised to not see much discussion of this test site or Jetico as a firewall, though I know some people here use it. According to this website Jetico passes the greatest number of their "leak tests". Interesting results. Even more so because Jetico is free! Anyone here user Jetico and have some thoughts?

http://www.firewalll...tester.com/tests.php

- Oshyan

39
SAN DIEGO – October 11, 2006 – QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq: QCOM), a leading developer and innovator of Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and other advanced wireless technologies, and the Mozilla Foundation, a public-benefit organization dedicated to promoting choice and innovation on the Internet, today announced that future versions of Eudora® will be based upon the same technology platform as the open source Mozilla Thunderbird™ email program. Future versions of Eudora will be free and open source, while retaining Eudora's uniquely rich feature set and productivity enhancements. QUALCOMM and Mozilla will each participate in, and continue to foster development communities based around the open source Mozilla project, with a view to enhancing the capabilities and ease of use of both Eudora and Thunderbird.

http://www.mozilla.c...illa-2006-10-11.html

I'm kind of at a loss to understand this one. But I'm wondering if what comes out of it may actually be kind of cool. A well-respected commercial email program with an aging UI and back end but still robust feature set combines with a newer, open source back end to become a new free, open source alternative, hopefully with the benefits of both? Might this be the "serious" email program many of us have been waiting for? And might this mean the address book in Eudora finally becomes non-modal and really usable? ;D

Or really, just... what the hell? :D

- Oshyan

40
Recently in this thread the subject of sending files through email came up and all the issues that entails. It got me wondering again whether there really is a good, easy solution for sending files that is comparable to email in its simplicity and ease of use. So many people use email for this purpose because the functionality is there and it's easy to use and familiar. Yet it is terribly inefficient and riddled with problems - from lack of download resume capability (in most cases) to the 30+% bloating of file size - email and the standard POP email protocol just wasn't built with file sending in mind.

This also makes me wonder why a more efficient encoding method such as yEnc hasn't been adopted for email as it has for news protocol. Of course this would take client support, but I don't think that is a big deal. The sooner the better.

Anyone know of any alternatives? I don't consider rapidshare or similar systems to really be comparable. First of all they're not direct, person-to-person, and generally not secure because of that. Sure your email data passes through several servers via email anyway, but it's transient, it doesn't usually sit there just waiting for someone to look at it. There are also more steps involved with web-based systems like that and few of them have dedicated desktop applications for streamlining. P2P systems also for the most part do not work that easily for specific individual file transfer. IM is too unreliable. Something like HFS works great IMO - even for non-tech people - but they need to be convinced to use it and when email "just works", why would they bother? Nevermind that email doesn't "just work" all that well, especially for the poor ISP's running the servers. But of course the average user doesn't really think about that.

Anyway, thoughts, ideas, alternatives?

- Oshyan

41
General Software Discussion / Looking for a wiki? Compare, compare!
« on: August 10, 2006, 01:33 AM »
I found this nifty online Wiki chooser/comparator/advisor yesterday while researching a wiki for a couple projects I'm working on. It's has detailed feature breakdowns and matrices for 61 wikis, with a wide range of features, platforms, requirements, and licenses. I thought it surely must be useful to someon else!

wikimatrix.gif

http://www.wikimatrix.org

It is not an exhaustive list, shown by the fact that it is missing PMwiki for one thing. But it is pretty remarkably inclusive nonetheless. And all this just goes to show: there are too many damn wiki apps out there! :D

- Oshyan




42
I could have sworn Scot Finnie's lengthy search for his ideal antivirus app had been discussed here before - in fact I remember commenting on his odd pickiness on certain criteria - but I can't seem to find the previous thread with a search. Must be SMF's broken search function. :P

Anyway, here's a snippet from his latest newsletter where he announces his "best antivirus app of 2006":

For those of you coming late to this party, over the last six months or so the newsletter has pursued an ongoing series on alternative antivirus packages. Back in December 2005 I wrote that I'd given up on Norton Antivirus and had been testing alternative antivirus utilities since the summer of 2005.

During the last year of testing, I've examined a wide range of antivirus product, and I've explored the features and options of many others. Products tested during this period include Avast 4.6 free and 4.7 Pro, AVG 7.1 Pro and Network Editions, BitDefender 9 Standard and 10 RC1, CA EZ Antivirus and eTrust Antivirus r8, F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006 and Internet Security 2006, Kaspersky 5 and 6, Nod32 2.5, Panda Titanium 2006 and Platinum 2006, and ZoneAlarm Antivirus. I've considered the features and specs of at least a dozen other products and rejected them because something didn't meet my ideal antivirus criteria.

Interestingly in the end it came down to AVG, F-Secure, and Nod32. Read his August Newsletter for his conclusions. Lots of other good info in this and his other newsletters too.

- Oshyan

43
Hi everyone, about 6 months ago I took a job as Technical Coordinator for a small nutrition education institution in Northern California. We currently use a fairly large and complex Filemaker Pro database to manage most of our info on students and other contacts. We have about 20,000 records, 15 or so active layouts (30 or so total) and several hundred database fields, including about 15-20 calculated fields. We use this database over our LAN as well as hosted to the outside world for remote use by our 2 other campuses.

We are soon to be embarking on a massive effort to move much of our business online. As part of that process we would very much like to sever our ties to running our own server for Filemaker, licensing Filemaker (we will need to pay for a costly upgrade soon if we want to expand to host more simultaneous users), and hopefully also end up with a greater ability to integrate our database with other parts of our business. We would like to work on automating a lot of things based on database info and changes.

To this end we are now looking at solutions for online databases and, more importantly, database management and front-ends. I know SQL can handle pretty much everything our Filemaker DB is doing as far as back-end storage is concerned. What we need - and what I am not yet aware of - is a replacement for the incredibly easy and powerful Filemaker Pro front end database manager and layout system. For those of you not familiar with Filemaker, it's basically like a more accessible version of Access. ;) The underlying structure is normal database fields, which are basically containers for data of a (possibly) specified type, or in some cases calculated values based on other fields. You enter data through fields, you can control how data is entered, data validation, etc. For our purposes it's also extremely important that there is powerful layout and visual formatting support. You can easily and fully control font, color, size, embossing, borders, text wrapping, draw boxes and lines, create buttons that lead to other layouts, etc, etc. For the low-end DB admin it's basically a dream come true. You can do many of the powerful things high-end DB's can do, but through a really simple interface.

So basically what we need is Filemaker but web-based and using SQL as the storage engine. This could be realized through any one of many different ways, but I know of none yet that is really an adequate solution. It may even be possible to make a local install of Filemaker interact with a remote SQL DB and use Filemaker as the front end - that would be great, but if that's possible to do well and seamlessly I'm not aware of it. Preferably we would find a tool that basically allowed everything Filemaker does, either totally online, or using a local management tool that interacted with the remote DB (like Drupal, or is it Plone?).

Is anyone aware of anything even remotely like this? If no such application exists it seems like there's probably a good market for it! I'll help fund development if someone wants to create it. ;) Basically combine an SQL management front end with a WYSIWYG web editor. :D

Any help is greatly appreciated and will be rewarded with credits!

- Oshyan

44
Living Room / Amazing collaborative drawing site.
« on: July 15, 2006, 04:01 AM »
Check this out, some of the work here is really amazing:

Screenshot - 7_15_2006 , 1_58_00 AM.jpg

http://best.drawball.com/

It records the total history of the workspace, which is really wonderful to watch. And if you go to the main site http://www.drawball.com/ then you can draw on the shared canvast yourself and your own process is recorded. Very cool concept and quite cleverly implemented.

- Oshyan

45
Living Room / WinFS - well and truly dead.
« on: July 06, 2006, 10:35 PM »
I was surprised not to see mention of this here previously. It looks like WinFS, which had been moved from a core Longhorn component to a post-release Vista upgrade some time ago, has now been essentially cancelled. Or at least the part that matters to an end user like me.

... some of the technology, especially the end user value points, are not ready...

http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/

I want my end user value points! :D

So does anyone else see this as a big opportunity for some other OS to step in and actually make this work? I would be completely unsurprised if Apple actually did this and A: it might make me finally move over to a Mac, B: it would be a brilliant lock-in technique to counter the new Bootcamp "buy a Mac and run Windows" trend that seems to be happening (although since Apple makes tidy profit on its hardware I doubt they're bothered). If the files were portable but the meta data and organizational structure wasn't, sure you *could* go back to a regular PC, but you'd be losing sooo much valuable info and categorization. Who would want to?

But then there's the question of whether this was ever really that great a thing anyway. It seems like more and more apps and online ventures are taking to keywords and tags. Perhaps at some point all apps that needed such organizational structures will implement them natively rather than at the OS level? Perhaps. But doesn't that seem like a waste of lots of programmer's time? And isn't the lack of consistency in implementation going to be annoying?

And what about where apps like Locate, X1, etc. fit into this? Do such rapid searching systems make this "folderless file system" unnecessary? Again, perhaps. But they don't solve hte meta data problem. A big part of what I wanted to be able to do was embed - either manually or, preferably, automatically - data into most every file I saved specifying, for example, the URL it was downloaded from and notes about why I downloaded it. Now an app like Locate could add this functionality but will it be as seamless and consistent as it could have been with WinFS? I guess we'll never know, or at least not for a while yet.

*sigh*

So Vista is now almost completely uninteresting to me. :P

- Oshyan

46
Living Room / "Maps" of Cyberspace
« on: July 03, 2006, 04:22 PM »
Topology Maps of Elements of Cyberspace

A screenshot of a 3D model of the vBNS network which connects universities and laboratories in the USA. The model was created by Jeff Brown, a researcher at MOAT, National Laboratory for Applied Network Research (NLANR), USA, using his Cichlid data visualisation software. The model is animated to show how traffic flows over the links.

More information on their work can be found in the paper "Network Performance Visualization: Insight Through Animation" by J.A. Brown, McGregor A.J and H-W Braun.

... and many more


Atlas of Cyberspace.png



from nowhere in particular (actually I have now forgotten)

47
I ran across this great little app today called HFS (HTTP file server) that allows you to very simply share any files on your system through HTTP. Yes, it's just a basic web server, sure it may not be super secure or anything, and yes it depends on your IP (can use dyndns or whatever you want though) and local outgoing bandwidth. But as far as ease of use and plug-and-play functionality, this is tops. I've definitely setup web servers on my system before and found some very good free apps to do this, but this one is really much more of a start-and-go solution for simple file sharing rather than a complete web serving solution, and as such it's the kind of thing you'd keep on a thumb drive or utilities disk. It's one of those "just works" apps and, considering its simplicity and ease of use, it's remarkably powerful.

http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/?f=intro

It's not too big at 600kb, it requires no installation and it is incredibly easy to use. It starts out in easy mode and set to "On", so file sharing is immediately available. To share something just drag it into the HFS window. It operates on a "virtual file system", which is fairly flexible and cool. This allows you to create virtual folders to sort your shared files into, irrespective of what real folders the content might be sorted into. It also means you don't have to copy the data anywhere in particular or setup specific location links to anything to share a file. You just drag and drop, or right-click and choose Add Files or Add Folder From Disk. The virtual file system (VFS) can also optionally be saved to a file. This allows you to easily have multiple sets of different shared files/folders and switch easily and quickly between them. You can have the VFS saved automatically on exit and reloaded on startup. Once you have shared your files just select the file or directory you want to share in the tree view then copy the address shown at the top and send to whomever you want.

It's actually surprisingly powerful and configurable too, including options to change ports, throttle bandwidth and max users, ban people, etc. What's cool about it is that you don't *have* to mess with any of the powerful stuff to get it to work. You just start it and it's on. Share your files, send the address, and you're done. Couldn't be simpler really. They don't have to have an account with any website or have any special software, just a web browser. Of course it depends on your own outgoing bandwidth, but that's not too bad, especially to share smaller things.

Anyway, I'll stop gassing on. Again this is really nothing new, it's just well designed and setup. :)

Edit: The deeper I dig into this the more full-featured it seems. Which makes it all the more remarkable that it's so easy to use and setup. It has individual user/pass functionality for any file/folder, editable content presentation templates, display file in browser (MIME type support), logging, etc, etc. I dunno, maybe this will start a thread on good, free HTTP servers, but I've never found one easier or "lighter" (no install, etc.) that is also easy to use.

- Oshyan

48
Ok, not exactly, but it's damn impressive either way! And looks like a fun experiment. :D

http://eepybird.com/

- Oshyan

49
I'm new to the world of blogging so I have no idea if what I'm about to describe exists or is even possible but it seems like some of the features ought at least to already be implemented. Here's the brief summary first:

Basically what I want to do is setup an identical blog on 2 totally different sites/servers and have the content bi-directionally mirrored. So if a post is made on a blog it will be mirrored to the other and, more importantly, if a comment is made on a post on one blog, it automatically gets added to the other, so they're always in sync.

The second part of this, which I am guessing already exists, is some kind of web-based blog aggregator that will essentially be a "blog of blogs" - a date-sorted headline-and-story-intro display of the most recent entries in whatever blogs I choose.

On the off chance that my reasoning for this will help understand my need, here's the full story (note that I repeat most of what I said above in a different way :D):

I just put up http://terrain.cg-arts.org/forum/ It's a forum for people in the terrain industry to talk about their work, tools, workflows, etc. We're inviting a bunch of terrain program developers, which is what brought up the idea.

One of said developers recently put up a blog http://www.world-machine.com/blog/ which has been rather successful and I've really enjoyed the info he's posted there as well as the discussion that has resulted. However it's really only immediately visible to the people who were already in the World Machine community. I think it should have wider exposure. More than that though I think other devs should strongly consider having such a "development diary" blog.

So I figured hey, why not provide them a free, easy blogging service. Setup a wordpress (or whatever) site for them with their own subdomain or subdirectory (http://l3dt.cg-arts.org/blog for example) then give 'em access to it and set 'em loose. Here's where the rest comes in...

I figure some devs, like Stephen (of World Machine), wouldn't want to *only* have their blog on our site. The only way they'll even bother is if we make it super easy for them, like if the one on our site is a direct mirror of theirs or something. This would be optional, since some devs would *only* have their blog with us.

Furthermore I would want one central home page for all the blogs which would show in order of most recently updated all the various blogs. Sort of like a blog of blogs, but maybe color coded or with very obvious author/application titles so people don't get confused. Basically there would be headlines on this main page with snippets from the latest post, and it would say "Latest from Stephen Schmitt's World Machine Blog: "Alpha-2 went out to the testing group late last week. The GUI is getting closer to final quality, although theres still a few huge things left to get done. Click here to read more." And if that was the latest entry updated across all the blogs on the site/group, it would be at the top of the list. As soon as someone else updated, that one would be at the top. And so of course clicking on each entry would take you to the full blog of the person/program.

And of course all of it could be RSS'd - both the individual blogs as well as the aggregator/home page. Or "meta blog" as it might be called. ;)

The intention is basically to provide a central location where people can find out about the latest developments in terrain apps. Probably not of interest to most of you, but it's a small obsession of mine. :D

If this kind of functionality doesn't exist I do think it could have wider appeal. Although there are already existing "meta blog" sites out there, it might be cool for basically anyone to be able to create their own customized meta blog. I am thinking there must already be some way to do this, but it is probably tied in with personalized home pages or something along those lines and I need something that doesn't require a login.

- Oshyan

50
Google and Gapminder have gotten together to create a very cool graphing visualizer of a bunch of interesting world statistics. And the coolest part is you can graph it over time and actually watch as the stats change! Compare average lifespan to number of physicians per capita and see if doctors really make us live longer - then watch the graph change over up to 50 years of data. Cool stuff. :)

http://tools.google.com/gapminder/

gapminder_app.jpg

- Oshyan

Pages: prev1 [2]