topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 26, 2024, 7:45 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - apankrat [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7next
26
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Diskovery
« on: March 30, 2016, 02:14 PM »
Nice, but it identifies my Samsung MZVPV256 SDD as a HDD. I don't know if that can be helped...but it's quite informative otherwise.

Oh... interesting. SSD is detected by looking at the RPM value from the ATA IDENTIFY blob. There's a reserved value (something like "1") which is reserved for SSDs, so I guess in your case it was set to something else.

Can I get a copy of a scan log, please? There's a menu item in the app for that.

27
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Diskovery
« on: March 30, 2016, 12:53 PM »
Would it be possible to display any useful information even without admin privileges?

Drive devices can actually be opened without admin rights if using NULL or FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES access, but this will cause vast majority of IOCTLs to fail, so you won't get much back. And any attempts to talk to the VDS service or open RAID controller device will fail outright. I started with the code that can work with and without admin rights, but the latter proved to be plain useless, so I scraped that.

28
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Diskovery
« on: March 30, 2016, 11:25 AM »
A screenshot. How could I forget that.

diskovery.png

29
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Diskovery
« on: March 30, 2016, 10:56 AM »
Gentlemen,

I'd like to solicit your esteemed opinions on a piece of software of mine called Diskovery.

      https://pipemetrics.com/diskovery/beta

There's a longer description on the home page, but in short it's basically an app that enumerates all local drives and volumes, extracts all information it can about them and then renders it nicely in the UI. In particular, it shows drives' SMART counters, temperature and it also allows to look into RAID arrays and see their individual drives († though some conditions certainly apply, YMMV, etc.)

It started as a unit test runner for a SMART diagnostics module for a backup app, but then as I played with it I kept adding this and that and it sort of started to evolve into something useful in its own right. Fast forward laughably short 3 months of abandoned kids, neglected wife and alienated friends and here it is - a brand new pile of bits entering its beta.

I haven't shown it publicly anywhere else, so I'm interested in all and any opinions - from the general idea to the functionality to the UI design to what have you and then some.

Thanks,
Alex

30
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup 2
« on: September 27, 2015, 03:43 PM »
Also, if I find a way to automate the cold-cache testing (suggestions would be very welcome!), I'll throw in stats from my old dualcore-with-SSD laptop.

I found a way (a while ago, I just keep forgetting to update this thread).

This is done by flushing "Standby list" of Windows Memory Manager. For example, with Sysinternals' RAMMap -

rammap.png

It can also be done with NtSetSystemInformation from within the app if needed.

31
Can I bump this thread? Just killed few weeks on adding SMTP client into a backup app and I just need to share :)
https://www.bvckup2....port/forum/topic/474 - release notes
https://www.bvckup2.com/wip - screenshots and notes on the process (these strangely help with motivation, so I just keep doing them)

32
Great to hear :)

By the way (or rather, completely unrelated) - I did a Show HN post on Hacker News and it generated over 20K uniques in 24 hours. Highly recommended if you've got a good project to show.

33
Is there any difference between the last beta and the current release version with respect to current features or bugs?

It would've been really strange if there weren't any, wouldn't it? :)

As of Release 69 the differences are as follows:

New features

⦁   Added support for backup run simulation (dry runs)
⦁   Extended shadow copying to recognize optional modules
⦁   Added an option for overriding default backup settings

Issues resolved

⦁   Fixed an issue with log viewer stealing input focus
⦁   Fixed a rare on-exit issue
⦁   Fixed two UI issues with editing periodic backup settings
⦁   Added an isolation layer for the Select Folder widget
⦁   Fixed several smaller UI issues
⦁   Fixed an issue of not logging context of certain failures

Other changes

⦁   File filters can now match by a file size range
⦁   File browser in filter configuration is now symlink-aware
⦁   Periodic 6-hour backup is a new default (was: real-time)

You can get the list by checking for updates from the last beta. It always shows the diff against latest production release.

34
Fair point, OK.

PS. There's always a magic CC# 4242 4242 4242 4242 which a test Visa card number :)

35
Indeed, it doesn't. For BETA-xx codes it's 50% off. Or you can try the PayPal form, there's no CC info there.

36
Click "Review Order" and you will see the adjusted total.

37
Thanks, Joe. This was the most productive beta I've ever run, period. I'm extremely happy how it went and the amount of help and support I got from it.

Re: doing a separate announcement thread - I think everyone who wanted has already learned about the release :)

38
Thanks. I am now torn between attending to a keg of beer and a much neglected exercise equipment :)

39
Bump.

Just released the final beta. Next release is a production version.

http://bvckup2.com/beta/#!/topic/356

PS. Do things take 10x longer than planned with you guys too or am I the odd one out? Damn. I thought I could get it completed in 2-3 months, but it's closing in on 2 years now.

40
Public service announcement

If you have to use Word or open RTF emails in Outlook, install EMET and enable it for both apps. In fact, it's generally not a bad idea to keep EMET enabled for your email client, your browser and the flash player *at all times*. Doing so plugs quite a few attack vectors and helps mitigating zero-days.

41
Bump.

I just released Beta 65, which is a the release candidate for the production version.

All in all, I'd say this was a damn good beta -

  • 11 months in total, 5 - in public beta
  • 65 releases
  • 140,000 lines of code
  • 700 git commits
  • 300+ forum threads
  • 1000+ support emails
  • Over 10K downloads

If you are using betas and planning to moving to the production release, make sure to grab a beta license in the next few days. This will be your 50% off coupon for the license.

And if you haven't checked Bvckup 2 out yet, now might be a very good time to do so - http://bvckup2.com ;)

PS. As I must've mentioned before, for those not wanting to update to the production version, the latest beta will remain perpetually available and I am planning to back-port critical fixes to it.

42
I just wanted to say I just picked up your program and this probably the best gem I've found on the internet. Incredible UI and exactly what I was looking for! Thanks for developing and keep it up. :)
Just one question: When released, do I need to buy a license for every computer I want to backup? Currently Beta testing with a family of 5. :P

Thanks, really happy to hear all of that :)

It is licensed per seat, correct, however there are progressive volume discounts - it keeps track how many licenses one has bought so far and discounts the next one appropriately (so the total amount paid wouldn't depend on whether you get 2 now and 3 later or all 5 at once).

>I tested it against a 1.5 million file backup and it kept within about 300 Megs. 

Amazing improvement. Congrats!
Here, the app keeps my desktop and server "in sync", fast, reliably and unobtrusively. Update went without a hitch.
 :Thmbsup:

Aye. I am running out of things to fix, damn it :)

43
Should be fixed now, in Beta 61.

44
Aye, thanks. I thought I fixed this ... :-/

45
the flickering of the progress text

Hmm, do elaborate. What is flickering exactly?

46
Beta 60 is out.

Took me a couple of months to rework the logging module, but the net effect is that now the memory usage during backups is flat. I tested it against a 1.5 million file backup and it kept within about 300 Megs. 

[attachimg=#1][/attachimg]

--

This reduction was achieved by keeping logs almost entirely off the memory. This sounds damn trivial until you remember that Bvckup logs are hierarchical and as such their arbitrary parts can be collapsed and expanded at will. Then think of what happens when there's a million-item log and a well-caffeinated user starts dragging scroll bar thumb up and down, up and down. The log viewer needs to compile the list of relevant visible items almost instantly, which is easy enough if you pre-compute the visibility list. However, the visibility list changes with every node expansion and collapse, so any pre-computation has to be done nearly instantly as well. Now, stir in a million-item log into the mix and you are looking at a data structure that simply does NOT exist :)

If I were in SV, I could've probably built a small, but loud and cocky startup around this log viewer. Got myself an .io domain, bootstrap'ed website, a viral sign-up form and market it as a service, got acquired by Twotter or another and then teach people how Knuth is not quite up to speed with modern computer science anymore. But I'm not in SV, so I won't do that.

--

In any case, other things in this release include monitoring of network locations (appearing/disappearing), few bug fixes, few UI improvements (see screenshots over here).

If you use the app, update. If you don't, you should give it a try, it's really quite awesome :)

47
Living Room / Re: Hard Drive Brand Reliability Data
« on: January 22, 2014, 07:06 AM »
Even if their use is a special case to some extent, I think a failure rate of over 10% is bad.

True that. However it might be that other drives are also at 10%, but they just lucked out in BB's case :)

48
Living Room / Re: Hard Drive Brand Reliability Data
« on: January 22, 2014, 03:45 AM »
One thing to keep in mind though is that these are failure rates under backblaze's usage. They are a backup provider. They may be routinely copying several very large files in parallel meaning higher than average and more random seeking, far more writing, cache thrashing, etc., which just may happen to correlate with Seagate's weak points and not those of WD. So you'd change the access pattern, you'd get a different failure profile by brand.

49
General Software Discussion / Re: Cobian Backup
« on: January 10, 2014, 03:04 AM »
But why are you switching?
Does the current version of Cobian have any issues that prevent you from keep using it?
Yes. I have problems. I comment at the beginning of the post.

Right, sorry. It's just that you said "splendid" and then you asked for alternatives :)

50
General Software Discussion / Re: Cobian Backup
« on: January 08, 2014, 03:10 PM »
Do you know alternatives ?

But why are you switching?
Does the current version of Cobian have any issues that prevent you from keep using it?

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7next