So, this poor woman downloads some stuff onto her phone to read... then gets sent to jail for it. 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9727045/Bride-jailed-for-downloading-terror-magazine.html
Thought crimes. Pure and simple. She's guilty of nothing other than trying to understand something. i.e. A thought crime. Which must "always carry a prison sentence."
It just doesn't get any more Orwellian than this.
Ooops... That's not true. Just wait until tomorrow... There will be another person convicted of thought crimes.
Oh, and just for the sake of committing a though crime, I'd like to post some information that could "aid a terrorist":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder#Combustion_characteristics
Information is just that. Information. (I'm tempted to quote the intro to "The Prisoner".)
Information is not a crime.
I own a copy of the Anarchist Cookbook, and have for around 20 years or so. It's a fun read. Does that make me a criminal?
Nuff said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9727045/Bride-jailed-for-downloading-terror-magazine.html
Quote
Sentencing her, Mr Justice Fulford accepted she only downloaded the material to see what had driven her brothers to terrorism.
...
She pleaded guilty last month to having material which was likely to be useful to someone committing or preparing an act of terrorism.
This was two editions of al Qaeda’s Inspire magazine on a micro SD memory card in her mobile.
...
"She is of good behaviour and a good Muslim.
"Against this background, I accept on the evidence before me that this defendant gathered together the contents of the SD card in order to explore and understand the charges which her brothers faced.
"There is no evidence that she was motivated by their ideology or was preparing to follow them.
"She had damaged what could have been a potentially blossoming future by committing these offences."
But, said the judge, the material could have aided a terrorist and such serious offences would always carry a prison sentence.
Thought crimes. Pure and simple. She's guilty of nothing other than trying to understand something. i.e. A thought crime. Which must "always carry a prison sentence."
It just doesn't get any more Orwellian than this.
Ooops... That's not true. Just wait until tomorrow... There will be another person convicted of thought crimes.
Oh, and just for the sake of committing a though crime, I'd like to post some information that could "aid a terrorist":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder#Combustion_characteristics
Quote
A simple, commonly cited, chemical equation for the combustion of black powder is
2 KNO3 + S + 3 C → K2S + N2 + 3 CO2.
A balanced, but still simplified, equation is
10 KNO3 + 3 S + 8 C → 2 K2CO3 + 3 K2SO4 + 6 CO2 + 5 N2.
Although charcoal's chemical formula varies, it can be best summed up by its empirical formula: C7H4O
An even more accurate equation of the decomposition of regular black powder with the use of sulfur can be described as:
4 KNO3 + C7H4O + 2 S —> 2 K2S + 4 CO2 + 3 CO + 2 H2O + 2 N2
Black powder without the use of sulfur:
6 KNO3 + C7H4O —> 3 K2CO3 + CO2 + 6 CO + 2 H2O + 2 N2
Information is just that. Information. (I'm tempted to quote the intro to "The Prisoner".)
Information is not a crime.

I own a copy of the Anarchist Cookbook, and have for around 20 years or so. It's a fun read. Does that make me a criminal?
Nuff said.





















I did get another copy afterward, but the damn thing isn't the same! They changed parts of it. Someday I'll find an early printing again. Renegade is correct in that a lot of the material is bogus - dangerously so. For me it's just a piece of trivia - nostalgia actually - from my sometimes misspent youth. 