DonationCoder.com forum
 
Read-only archive. This is a static copy of the DonationCoder.com forum. Reading and searching work as before; logging in, posting and private messages do not.
Archive of 2026-10-21 · About this archive · Main site

Author Topic: Not Unicode?  (Read 6,167 times)

Renegade

  • Tell me something you don't know...
  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,291
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Three Times
    • Furry Fandom Badge - Furry Fandom
    • Linux User
Not Unicode?
« on: April 28, 2012, 05:03 AM »
Is there ever any compelling reason to not use Unicode?

Like, why would anyone ever use a local language encoding?

Perhaps on extremely small controller chips, like 8-bit or 4-bit procs, you may be pressed for space, but in the normal world of computing... any reasons?
Slow Down Music - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker

Ath

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 3,649
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Eleven Times
    • Coding Snacks
    • Linux User
    • Hardware Hacker
Re: Not Unicode?
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2012, 07:45 AM »
Is there ever any compelling reason to not use Unicode?
1) When using a compiler/runtime lib that doesn't (natively) support unicode... (ex. Delphi / BCB < 2009)
/Ton
Ath's software collection, Quote: "A problem well stated is a problem half-solved." (Charles Kettering)

daddydave

  • test
  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 867
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Once
Re: Not Unicode?
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2012, 07:37 PM »
See also this thread. I had asked the same thing not long ago, as you probably know.

Renegade

  • Tell me something you don't know...
  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,291
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Three Times
    • Furry Fandom Badge - Furry Fandom
    • Linux User
Re: Not Unicode?
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2012, 12:20 AM »
I remember that thread. Slightly different question here, but close.

I suppose that if the tools you have don't support it... then... ummm... yeah, why not retool? :D (That's not really practical for a lot of people.)

It just seems like it's been so long that by now things should work properly. :(
Slow Down Music - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker

Ath

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 3,649
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Eleven Times
    • Coding Snacks
    • Linux User
    • Hardware Hacker
Re: Not Unicode?
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2012, 11:00 AM »
A related question that popped up recently (but has been lingering around for a while), is if a Unicode-capable program, should also support rtl-languages like Chinese, Japanese, Arabic etc., now that these character-sets are supported?

Writing software that is available, and could be used, globally, I might have to educate myself in these features and languages, just to 'support' the roughly 1/3 part of the world that uses their language that way...
/Ton
Ath's software collection, Quote: "A problem well stated is a problem half-solved." (Charles Kettering)

Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=30830.0