If the drive is write protected, would I have to worry about any of these infections?
No... but I'm not sure that Firefox portable will run on a write-protected drive. It saves your profile information and cache there if I'm correct...
If the drive is write protected, would I have to worry about any of these infections?
How does KeePass insert the encrypted passwords into the other apps? It would be trivial to add a clipboard watcher to a keylogger...
Thanks for that link - it's a decent system he's implemented, I had been thinking of something similar. While it will fool a bog-standard keylogger, there's still some ways to target it. You could (probably) log the clipboard entries when Ctrl+V is sent to the target app (that way you don't have to be part of the clipboard listener chain, nor poll the clipboard constantly). Or API-level hooks could be thrown into the mix...How does KeePass insert the encrypted passwords into the other apps? It would be trivial to add a clipboard watcher to a keylogger...
And Dominik would like to see his methods challenged. Note that this is for KeePass 2.x, KeePass 1.x lacks any kind of protection against keyloggers if you rely on AutoType.
Here in Australia most public 'puters are set up with limited rights i.e. not admin so you can't actually launch apps from a usb. Similar in the USA /Europe?
there are even physical monitoring devices that can capture your username and password... and who's to say that if the computer is fine that the network itself isn't vulnerable?mmm...all good points. Is it just my dirty mind, or does scancode's avatar look like a punctured condom?
point blank, it's risky to use nearly any public connection or computer, no matter how safe you are. it's like having sex with a hooker, they could be clean, or they could be dirty and you might be ok with a condom, or you might use a condom and manage to get an STD anyway. no matter how you slice it, it's risky business.
now, this immediately suggests that an extremely useful feature for a vpn/remoteconnect tool would be the use of one-time pads, single-use passwords, hardware key ids. anyone know of any vpn/remote desktop that supports this?That would be really useful! But I don't know of one. I also think it is outright weird that big services like gmail doesn't offer something like that already. You could log in with your regular password and generate and print out 10 temporary passwords that each expire after one use (and to make new ones you'd need the regular pw again).

you could just use a program that can calculate hashes of the files.
actually that would make a very nice portable app -- a program which when run scans the drive and creates hashes of all files found, and compares to previous set of saved hashes, reporting any differences and new files. bonus if it also did this on boot records. goal would be to make it super easy to use with no real options, just run it and wait for it to tell you nothing has changed most of the time.. or report on new files. on rare malware infection it will report the changing of some files. (be smart if it flagged changed exe's more dramatically than changed .txt files).
could be extremely useful for portable file use.
in fact, it might very well make sense to run it immediately after inserting a drive to see if any malware wants to try to infect any executables on your usb, kind of like a honeypot.
this would make a great NANY 2011 project for someone..
Oh, I wasn't worried about the hash-checking program intentionally having it's checking functionality disabled - but along the lines of the program getting infected on one machine, and when running on the next spreading the infection. If the infection was with a nasty piece of self-hiding code, the hash-checking would be ineffective without having been explicitly targeted.
I know this is a week-old thread, but aren't you guys missing something? Just put the hash checker on the read-only part of the drive! Tell me if my idea is flawed..But I'm pretty sure it's doable. You just have to preload the hashes into the read-only part of the USB before you go anywhere.If you have an USB drive with separate read/only and read/write parts, sure - never came upon one like that myself, though.
That is easy using something like Truecrypt to make your file work as a read-only disc. Don't know if that would really make it work though - requires more thought...I know this is a week-old thread, but aren't you guys missing something? Just put the hash checker on the read-only part of the drive! Tell me if my idea is flawed..But I'm pretty sure it's doable. You just have to preload the hashes into the read-only part of the USB before you go anywhere.If you have an USB drive with separate read/only and read/write parts, sure - never came upon one like that myself, though.




Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=23092.0