Latest build v2.3.2 seems to be running just fine on Windows 10 x86 b10074

Might want to consider running Streams.exe -s -d *.* on the release to eliminate [application blocked] security warning hassles. Granted I never did it either...but I should have..

Quote from: Stoic Joker on May 01, 2015, 12:18 PM

Latest build v2.3.2 seems to be running just fine on Windows 10 x86 b10074

Stoic, I have lost track.  Is WhiteTigX or you or both doing the current work on this?
In post 1, I get a 404 for the link in the original post (actually Reply "0"; Reply 1 is the second post))
"www.StoicJoker.com/TClock for general info. Download is still only available here."

I must be dense.  In that post, there are so many "this is here and that is there" that I can never figure out where to get it.  The above indicates I failed again.

WhiteTigX has the project now...so his GitHub link (IFP) is where to get the latest build of T-Clock. My site has been down for a while now, as I've restructured/updated my lab and aren't really sure what if anything to do with the site.

well.. 2.3.2 is still the current / old version
Though I'll actually release a new version near the end of this month

With these fixed: https://github.com/White-Tiger/T-Clock/issues (I still need help with the "time update" one.. as it works on my Win 7 VM as it always did..)
Colorizable calendar, new "Wu" week format (should be in sync with U.S. Windows' week numbering) and some Coverity scan fixes

[...]
Might want to consider running Streams.exe -s -d *.* on the release to eliminate [application blocked] security warning hassles. [...]

uhm.. that must be done on each user installation^^ If you're talking about "untrusted app, do you want to run?" thingy.. that's added because it was downloaded from the internet and you've extracted it with Windows' build in extractor...
Those hidden streams are only added after a download and/or extraction... (using 7zip for extraction for example is pretty safe)

I would suggest to just add the "th" yourself.. but guess you can't live with "1th, 2th, 3th" xD
Well.. guess it would be doable as a custom format.. though I worry just a little bit about translatability.. just in case it'll ever happen one day.

Does anyone else want days to be expressed like: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so 4th ?

You need to install the MS Visual C++ 2010 redistributable package for the bitness (x86/x64) you're running.

they are linked under "Requirements" btw https://github.com/White-Tiger/T-Clock#requirements
Or, you could use the static builds... but since you need those redistributables sooner or later, non-static should be preferred.

Hello everyone, sorry for my bad English.

I installed T-Clock REDUX on Win XP SP2 with white color font and, if you go with the mouse over the clock area (bottom right), appears a white rectangle that completely covers the date and time (white color font), but it appears correctly mouse-over tooltip text.

Instead using T-Clock 2010 this does not happen, no one white rectangle, and when you go with the mouse over the clock area you read correctly the date and time, but it did not appear the pop-up with the date.

Obviously if you use any different font color than white, it reads well even with the white rectangle, but I want to use the color white for the font.

It is a known problem and solved in some way?

You can eliminate the white rectangle that appears in the clock area?

You can possibly change the color of the rectangle with a specific item in the menu, so you can also make it transparent?

Thank you.

Thanks for the reply.

I wait for the new update with the resolution of the "bug".

Bye.

you didn't make a backup of your "corrupted" settings by any chance?
Compatibility with Stoic Joker's version was one of my top priorities... that's why it converts settings... (well, generally backwards compatibility... and "upwards" compatibility when possible..)
I'm also unsure why the clock might be empty... unless the "no-clock" setting was set... but it's possible that I've even replaced that setting (if custom format is used, and empty, no-clock mode will be activated)

So... it was really empty? Rather, missing clock? So you couldn't even click on it to open settings etc.?
You're sadly not the first one with this issue... but I didn't get that many reports.. you're the 2nd or 3rd... yet no one managed to make a backup of their settings before deletion

--
I had an empty clock once.. but that was on Windows 2000 because my current/old code wasn't that compatible.. the same issue might happen on XP 32bit.. but the deletion of settings wouldn't work in my case anyway... (it was a fresh installation in my case.. and it simply couldn't write any settings... so it's a different case)

P.S.
I'm aware that I'm more than a month behind my schedule for my next release... currently the summer hit the place I live in... and I hate the heat xD But that's not actually the main reason... just the reason why it progresses even slower from now on.

basically an registry export of HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Stoic Joker's\T-Clock 2010
Either manually or with such an batch file: (.export.cmd))

@echo off
pushd %~dp0
regedit /e _export.reg "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Stoic Joker's\T-Clock 2010"
regedit /e _export64.reg "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wow6432Node\Stoic Joker's\T-Clock 2010"
if exist _export.reg ( echo exported to "_export.reg" )
if exist _export64.reg ( echo exported 32bit stuff to "_export64.reg" )
popd
echo.&echo anykey to exit&pause>nul

But I doubt that your other PC will have the same problems.. If possible though, I'd like to have an export before and after my version... yet the later is more important I guess.

So if the error occurs, just PM me your exports..

I would suggest to just add the "th" yourself.. but guess you can't live with "1th, 2th, 3th" xD
Well.. guess it would be doable as a custom format.. though I worry just a little bit about translatability.. just in case it'll ever happen one day.

Does anyone else want days to be expressed like: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so 4th ?

Firstly, I'd also like to say thanks to Stoic Joker for his long-standing work in making T-Clock such a useful and viable piece of software. I'd imagined that he was long lost in the ether of the past - but he still posts! Muchas gracias.

Second, TigX - yes, I'd like to support the introduction of ordinal date suffixes. Natural forces are subjecting us to the hegemony of our friends in the USA, but many in the rest of the world remain adherents to the logical 'small, bigger, biggest' form of date expression - dd/mm/yyyy, implicit in that being that days in a month are - the first one, the second one, etc.
Days don't have names: July Fifteen, December Twenty-Five, January One.. I call it ugly. However, suffixes in the USA aren't entirely unknown - July Fifteenth has been heard.
I'd recommend that st nd rd th th th.. become established as a 'class', or whatever programmers call such things. Such versatility would be most welcome here.

IF such (ordinals) are added, please do it as an option that can be turned on or off.

of course

PhredE, just to make it clear for me, it's "31st", "22nd" ? (well, anyone who really knows that is welcome to answer xD)
And yes.. I would write "11th", and not "11st" ^^