I hadn't visited this thread in a bit, and decided to check in.
Thanks for posting those speed comparisons, but for me, the speed issue isn't why I use SuperCopier. The speed difference is pretty trivial all in all, but what I use it for is the ability to throttle copy speed (I do use this feature) and to allow XP to not just bomb on copy or move errors. I also like the ability to insert or remove items from a running copy. So, for me its a no brainer: SuperCopier hands down. I just wish they would make it work properly under Vista. Even with Vista's enhancements to the copy/move dialog (no longer just dies on errors for one) I still much prefer the way SuperCopier works. I tried TeraCopy and just didn't like it at all.
Thanks for posting those speed comparisons, but for me, the speed issue isn't why I use SuperCopier. The speed difference is pretty trivial all in all, but what I use it for is the ability to throttle copy speed (I do use this feature) and to allow XP to not just bomb on copy or move errors. I also like the ability to insert or remove items from a running copy. So, for me its a no brainer: SuperCopier hands down. I just wish they would make it work properly under Vista. Even with Vista's enhancements to the copy/move dialog (no longer just dies on errors for one) I still much prefer the way SuperCopier works. I tried TeraCopy and just didn't like it at all.













good one lanux, still its inelegantness (
) is something to admire 



Not bad at all, very light. Excellent for copying a disc to your hard drive (great if you use nLite lots). Tons of command switches, and source code available. Shows really detailed info in the dialog. Automatically saves used paths. Has no move function in context menu, but instead a delete feature. No system hooks.
VanDragt.com
Just me being careless with my choice of words. I don't know what was causing this. Essentially, after a reboot (first since installing teracopy yesterday) this morning my computer was sluggish right off the bat and DOpus was frozen - I had to kill dopus.exe via TM (and noted at that time the CPU problem reported above). I'd been noticing explorer.exe and its RAM over the last 24 hours or so - 43MB VM is normal but RAM is usually well below 20MB and often below 15. Anyway, after killing DOPus' lister this morning the only thing I could think of that I've changed over the last 24 hours was teracopy, so I uninstalled it and immediately noted that explorer.exe fell to 13MB and when I restarted DOPus.exe it started at 0% CPU and 30MB VM and has stayed there (even after opening a lister) - entirely normal on my machine.