^wow. That kind of deserves a thread of it's own.Is it likely that it is game over? Very good question.
Is that true, all that? I mean, I dont suspect him of lying - but is it a realistic analysis?
I suspect that it very likely is true/realistic, given that he is apparently expressing his qualified opinion and interpretation of facts regarding the construction of the consortium W3C. I recall that, a few years ago, Microsoft ably demonstrated how to force through the adoption/enforcement of their proprietary standards in W3C, in their method of promulgation of the XML standard (e.g., which was in train as far back as 1999 in "the XML wars"). IBM were similarly pushing their preferred/proprietary standards counter to that.
I recall reading a technical paper in about 2003/4 by the author of Speak Freely (John Walker). He described that he was handing over SF to the public domain and abandoning it as-is/was, as he reckoned that the introduction of NAT (Network Address Translation) in routers had effectively defeated the longer-term possibility of a free, anonymous Internet (OWTTE).
Notwithstanding, SF seems to be able to offer - in its crypto form, at any rate - something that probably did not exist before in the public domain, namely secure P2P encrypted voice communication - and it works.
Post SnowdenGate, we could presume that The NSA would probably hate the thing.
Useful, but probably a bit off-topic:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
I just now looked at the Sourceforge links for this. The file versions of the different options don't seem to be any different/changed to the ones I have (same date/version), but there seems to be some confusing duplication of the project in Sourceforge (or circular linking) and it is difficult to establish whether the available downloads are the same thing or whether they are crypto and non-crypto versions, or just the latter.
I wondered whether there might have been some tampering of downloadable installation files to deliberately confuse/defeat/remove the crypto capability. Fortunately the source is available.
These are the files I had: (downloadable here - SpeakFreely v7.6a.zip):
[attach]
I wondered whether there might have been some tampering of downloadable installation files to deliberately confuse/defeat/remove the crypto capability. Fortunately the source is available.
These are the files I had: (downloadable here - SpeakFreely v7.6a.zip):
[attach]










