DonationCoder.com forum
 
Read-only archive. This is a static copy of the DonationCoder.com forum. Reading and searching work as before; logging in, posting and private messages do not.
Archive of 2026-10-21 · About this archive · Main site

Last post Author Topic: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists  (Read 27,375 times)

Shades

  • Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 2,954
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #25 on: June 01, 2013, 07:36 PM »
As far as I know, the NTFS version on Vista and its more modern kin use a transactional model to do the writing and reading to disk. Although that is an extra layer, in most cases it makes the filesystem faster and more reliable.

Until things go wrong, but I explained (or at least tried to) in a previous post on a different thread that I managed to make the Operating system lose contact with the file system (W2008 R2), which destroyed two huge Oracle test databases I maintain.

Anecdotal, but here goes:
Even after aligning the partitions on my XP computer I still feel that the new NTFS version on my W2008 R2 computer is faster (both use SATA2 disks).

 
The easy path is usually downhill...

mraeryceos

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2010
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2013, 09:36 AM »
deleted
« Last Edit: June 07, 2013, 11:53 AM by mraeryceos »

Ath

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 3,649
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Eleven Times
    • Coding Snacks
    • Linux User
    • Hardware Hacker
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2013, 09:40 AM »
However, file handling was faster.
Can you elaborate on your benchmark method? And the speed-improvement (percentage) you found?
/Ton
Ath's software collection, Quote: "A problem well stated is a problem half-solved." (Charles Kettering)

mraeryceos

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2010
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2013, 09:49 AM »
deleted
« Last Edit: June 07, 2013, 11:53 AM by mraeryceos »

Ath

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 3,649
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Eleven Times
    • Coding Snacks
    • Linux User
    • Hardware Hacker
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #29 on: June 02, 2013, 03:20 PM »
But that doesn't anwer my questions :o
/Ton
Ath's software collection, Quote: "A problem well stated is a problem half-solved." (Charles Kettering)

f0dder

  • [Well, THAT escalated quickly!]
  • Charter Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,153
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Once
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #30 on: June 02, 2013, 09:01 PM »
FAT32 performs better on smaller partitions.
Quantify "performs better", please?

While ACLs and metadata journaling does "cost a bit", NTFS is a lot more efficient for file lookup than FAT is, and small files can have their content stored directly in the file's MFT record.
- carpe noctem

mraeryceos

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2010
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2013, 10:50 AM »
deleted
« Last Edit: June 07, 2013, 11:52 AM by mraeryceos »

Ath

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 3,649
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Eleven Times
    • Coding Snacks
    • Linux User
    • Hardware Hacker
Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists
« Reply #32 on: June 07, 2013, 11:48 AM »
Ath and F0dder.  "I found benchmarks online some time ago".  Google is your friend
Notice I edited the last comment
This still means nothing. No numbers, no comparison. Just give a link to the actual testing-tool you used and the configuration that was tested.

OT:
This is beginning to sound like a troll thread >:(
/Ton
Ath's software collection, Quote: "A problem well stated is a problem half-solved." (Charles Kettering)

Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=34729.0