DonationCoder.com forum
 
Read-only archive. This is a static copy of the DonationCoder.com forum. Reading and searching work as before; logging in, posting and private messages do not.
Archive of 2026-10-21 · About this archive · Main site

Author Topic: It Pays To Read License Agreements (7 Years Later)  (Read 4,712 times)

KynloStephen66515

  • Animated Giffer in Chief
  • Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2010
  • **
  • Posts: 3,772
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Three Times
    • Cody Award
    • Coding Snacks
    • Official Forum Clown
    • Volunteers/Staff
    • Writer
    • Hardware Hacker
    • DJ Badge - DJ
    • Linux User
It Pays To Read License Agreements (7 Years Later)
« on: June 17, 2012, 05:58 PM »
Quote
Back in 2005, one lucky PC Pitstop customer won $1,000 by simply reading our End-User License Agreement (EULA) We temporarily added a clause to our EULA offering money to anyone who contacted us, but it took five months and more than 3,000 sales before the first person – dropped us a line asking about the clause.

7 years later — our experiment continues to garner attention in articles detailing the dangers of unread EULAs.

Read More: http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2012/06/12/it-pays-to-read-license-agreements-7-years-later/?eula-7yearslater=

barney

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,294
Re: It Pays To Read License Agreements (7 Years Later)
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2012, 08:28 PM »
Hm-m-m ... I've seen that discussion a few different places.  The automatic assumption is that if no one applied for the largess, no one read the EULA.  That is a false assumption.  I've run across a few of those in the past.  Not all monetary, but promising some supposedly tempting reward if ya responded.  It was never worth my time to respond.

Hey, you'll give me a thousand bucks if I tell you I read your EULA?  Yeah.  Right!  I believe that, I really do  :o.  And I'm gonna jump right on it.  As soon as I have time.  Maybe next decade.

Gambling on human greed is supposed to be a safe bet, but experience dictates that we're not all as greedy as the gamblers would, or would have us, believe.  Between a [personally observed] diminution of that greed level, an ignored degree of disbelief, and a convenience/inconvenience/time element, I cannot buy this particular methodology as a valid test.  Too many unknown - unknowable, in fact - variables.  The assumptions made are statistically unwarranted based upon the test performed.  All it's good for is an argument in a bar somewhere  :beerchug:.
Make a good day ... barn

TaoPhoenix

  • 0 - 60 ... then back to 0 again!
  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2011
  • **
  • Posts: 4,642
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Three Times
Re: It Pays To Read License Agreements (7 Years Later)
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2012, 10:23 PM »

I dunno, if it flatly said "read this and earn $1000" I'd do it. I'm the kind of guy who reads the introductions to books and sometimes doesn't even read the book.

One problem is that there are a lot of materials out there that read "for a chance to win $1000", and THAT is not worth the time.
Use attachthumb=# to show an attached image as an expandable thumbnail, or attach=# to show full size. (With Brackets)

Cloq

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
Re: It Pays To Read License Agreements (7 Years Later)
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2012, 12:15 AM »
One problem is that there are a lot of materials out there that read "for a chance to win $1000", and THAT is not worth the time.

*ahem* May I interest you with an email that may contain the winning number for the UK lottery for 10,000,000 Euro!? Surely the email would be worth the time... you may already be a winner!

:D

Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=31345.0