But we're just getting warmed up 


The thread is yours and I am off.
timns, you started bad-mouthing our product. You should stop it now, OK? It is for no good.



QuoteThe software seems good but I and others on DC have disagreed with the company's attitude
Rjbull, I believe this describes your posting best. ;-)
InstantText is absolutely worth its money for its specific purpose and is tailored with awesome capabilities to the specific market of medical/legal transcription. However, I would hesitate to say that it has "more features" than PhraseExpress.
InstantText does not support text formatting, does not offer completion of full sentences and afaik, it has no macro automation programming language. Just to name a few.
PhraseExpress is not only a text auto-completion software, but also a text/code snippets organizer. Well, ...Merylic already provided the list of features.
The feature I was interested in was being able to use the same short form for more than one long text, e.g. "apon" for "application," "apparition," and "apportion."
I am happy to tell, that this feature always was and is available in the free version and I am sorry if you missed that.


I have said - more than once
Which leaves me ruefully remembering I paid extra for the Pro version 7 to get it
When sending out notifications, is there any way you can make it clear in the e-mail that it is a paid upgrade?
Your licensing is now slightly more complicated than it was, too, as I think you only used to have two versions, where you now appear to have three?
but its key feature that I haven't seen anywhere else is the ability to examine a corpus of pre-existing text (including Word docs) and work out a set of expansions based on it (..) IT gives you further tools for massaging the short forms so generated into whatever style you prefer.
As a final note: It is somehow difficult to handle PhraseExpress related issues/questions in another product's thread. On the one hand we don't want to appear that we would ignore any such question regarding our product as we consider any feedback very important. On the other hand, I also don't want to "hijack" other's threads for this purpose.




- Would it be possible to trigger with a popup?
p.e. now I use \\a" to write an "ä"
and \\a^ to write an "â"
and so on
It would be nice if Auspex can do this:
write an "a" --> trigger --> popup with â,ä,à etc
and "A" --> trigger --> popup with Ä,Â,Á etc

Windows does have the "US International" keyboarddriver available, that can be installed next to the much used US keyboard, and is easily activated/switched by a left-ctrl-shift press. Then it's even easier to type "a to get ä, 'c to get ç, ^o for ô. If you need the accent without the following letter, just press space.
I wouldn't use Auspex for that. It's correct that the standard keyboarddriver doesn't facilitate to show a popup.

Hi Robbero,
Thank you for all the comments and feedback. I'm planning a new release of the software this weekend and I will add as many features as I can from your excellent list.
Sorry about the crash - the AutoCompletions folder is where Auspx stores words that it has learned from you. I'd better prevent that from being deleted
I'll add your comments to redmine so we can track them.



... where control+space is autocompletion for variables and functions. I don't think that keyboard combo can be changed?


... where control+space is autocompletion for variables and functions. I don't think that keyboard combo can be changed?
It's not Ctrl-Space, but a dead key, like ', followed by a space that produces the '. If it where Ctrl-space I wouldn't be able to use it either
@roberro: The dead keys are so natural and transparent in daily use that it's hardly documented, because most users don't want to live without it after they discover it
Most of them I have to help/learn to add the standard VS keyboard, and switch layout using left-ctrl-shift, because they have the need to disable it at times (mostly developers, using quoted strings in their sources).
I noted a few more things:
I noted also that my Mnemonic field was expanded a few times with the text in replacement.
Maybe I have to add Auspex to the exception window
Sorry for all my questions.

Without using auspex today, I had a 50 or more access violations (see attachment).

Without using auspex today, I had a 50 or more access violations (see attachment).
@Cranioscopical, there's something in there just for you


Without using auspex today, I had a 50 or more access violations (see attachment).
Found and fixed. Will be in build 93 or greater, when I upload that. Along with some other nice features with thanks to all who made good suggestions.



Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=23643.0