Autopatcher XP is the way I do my updates..
I've never had any issues with it, and in the newer versions the updater retrieves the files directly from MS anyway, making it faster to download and is as good as if not better than autoupdates.
Oh, and it's seems to always be a total of a single reboot afterwards, no matter how many updates you apply.
In addition to that I prefer to do it this way because I only need to download them once, not for every system and VM I use.
I've never had any issues with it, and in the newer versions the updater retrieves the files directly from MS anyway, making it faster to download and is as good as if not better than autoupdates.
Oh, and it's seems to always be a total of a single reboot afterwards, no matter how many updates you apply.
In addition to that I prefer to do it this way because I only need to download them once, not for every system and VM I use.


). That might tend to be more vulnerable to some updates. Also, and I know that this matters - I have an AMD chip instead of Intel. Changes made by MS are tested much more thoroughly on Intel-based machines than with AMD chips. (Probably because there are more Intel machines??)
