DonationCoder.com forum
 
Read-only archive. This is a static copy of the DonationCoder.com forum. Reading and searching work as before; logging in, posting and private messages do not.
Archive of 2026-10-21 · About this archive · Main site

Author Topic: FARR review  (Read 24,878 times)

nitrix-ud

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
FARR review
« on: January 31, 2008, 08:01 PM »
an article named : The Quicksilver-for-windows Showdown

http://lifehacker.com/351117/the-quicksilver+for+windows-showdown

jgpaiva

  • Artificial Idiocy
  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2006
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,727
    • Cody Award
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Once
    • Coding Snacks
    • Portugal Inhabitant
    • Linux User
Re: FARR review
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2008, 08:20 PM »
Cool!!!
Congrats, mouser!  :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

It's great that FARR is the one with more plugins, just shows how well mouser designed the plugin system and how cool the DC community is ;)

Also important to notice is that most of the others are criticized for the search not working correctly, which means the heuristics farr uses are the best :P

Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,985
    • Gathering Badge
Re: FARR review
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2008, 08:36 PM »
Nice, nitrix-ud! I just dropped in here to post about this very article. Note that FARR finishes in the top 3. MightyBox looks interesting.

Congratulations, mouser  :Thmbsup: Hopefully, this kind of exposure will increas FARR's profile!
"Some people have a way with words, other people,... oh... have not way" - Steve Martin

taichimaster

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • Plugin Coding Medal
Re: FARR review
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2008, 09:47 PM »
Congrats mouser!

The review pointed out a link (http://www.donationcoder.com/Software/Mouser/findrun/addons/) that I didn't even know it exists!  Now I get to try out some new aliases :)

nontroppo

  • spinning top
  • Charter Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Re: FARR review
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2008, 10:30 PM »
Finally Lifehacker acknowledges more than just Launchy exists on Windows!  ;)

It would be great to get FARR 2 out of reluctant beta status and into the wild, surely it is no more buggy than any of the others?

Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,985
    • Gathering Badge
Re: FARR review
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2008, 10:43 PM »
It would be great to get FARR 2 out of reluctant beta status and into the wild, surely it is no more buggy than any of the others?

Farr less so, in my experience!

EDIT: saw an opportunity to make a terrible pun and seized it  :-[
"Some people have a way with words, other people,... oh... have not way" - Steve Martin
« Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 12:52 AM by Darwin »

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,931
    • Gathering Badge
    • Plugin Coding Medal
    • Participated in NANY Challenge Seventeen Times
    • Cody Award
    • Coding Snacks
    • Volunteers/Staff
Re: FARR review
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2008, 12:04 AM »
Cool!!

Quote
Finally Lifehacker acknowledges more than just Launchy exists on Windows!
yes! couldn't agree more, it's really nice to see.  i really do appreciate the lifehacker folks for taking the time to check it out.

Lashiec

  • Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 2,374
Re: FARR review
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2008, 08:59 PM »
Hey, you get mentioned as one of the three Quicksilver alumni most likely to succeed in life ;D. Congrats!

With the advent of KDE to Windows, I wonder if Katapult could be also a challenger. I mean, interface wise is very similar to Quicksilver, but haven't investigated its advanced capabilities too much. Gnome Do seems like a worthy contender as well, but GTK under Windows...

Armando

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,727
    • Coding Snacks
Re: FARR review
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2008, 05:08 AM »
IMO though, farr is superior to Quicksilver :P (I know some will think this is blasphemy, but...)! And although others are cute, they're definitely not as powerful and flexible. (BTW, this page could be updated : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_application_launchers)

Lashiec : I don't know if Katapult has dramatically changed since last time I tried it, but it was pretty elementary back then. Nothing, really, in comparison to farr or quicksilver. I actually found alternatives, like Launchbox or Gnome Do, superior.
"I suppose it can be said that I'm an absent-minded driver. It's true that I've driven through a number of red lights on occasion, but on the other hand, I've stopped at a lot of green ones but never gotten credit for it."
Glenn Gould

nontroppo

  • spinning top
  • Charter Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Re: FARR review
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2008, 10:03 AM »
I think Dash *is* powerful and well thought out, though another developer whose hyperbole matches the code size!

"Dash can change your life..."

http://www.trydash.com/home/dash-video-tour/

;D

Lashiec

  • Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 2,374
Re: FARR review
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2008, 06:08 PM »
IMO though, farr is superior to Quicksilver :P (I know some will think this is blasphemy, but...)! And although others are cute, they're definitely not as powerful and flexible. (BTW, this page could be updated : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_application_launchers)

Lack of "cutesy" is my main concern about FARR :D

Ah, yes, that page. I held off its updating due to mouser desire to not spread the word about the new FARR yet (besides, that page only holds information about the stable versions of the apps). If he does not mind, I'll update it right away.

Quote
Lashiec : I don't know if Katapult has dramatically changed since last time I tried it, but it was pretty elementary back then. Nothing, really, in comparison to farr or quicksilver. I actually found alternatives, like Launchbox or Gnome Do, superior.

I see. I though it was more powerful, and though its screenshots page show some potential, it may not be comparable with Gnome Do, which seems to have some tricks of its own. Never heard about Launchbox, that looks interesting as well, but it's also powered by GTK. Ow.

Original address: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=12085.0