topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday December 12, 2024, 2:03 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Old CHS for Win98?  (Read 6210 times)

rjbull

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 3,205
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Old CHS for Win98?
« on: November 01, 2006, 05:06 AM »
Mouser,

I know the current version of CHS is for Windows 2000 onwards.  Was there ever an older stable version that would work on Win9x?


mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,914
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Re: Old CHS for Win98?
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2006, 08:48 AM »
if the current version wont work on win98 (im not sure if it will), then older versions won't either.

rjbull

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 3,205
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Old CHS for Win98?
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2006, 09:01 AM »
OK.  I haven't tried it, but saw the Win2K requirement on the CHS page, and wondered if that was recent or not.




mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,914
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Re: Old CHS for Win98?
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2006, 06:56 PM »
who has win98 and feels daring ? :)

rjbull

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 3,205
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Old CHS for Win98?
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2006, 02:35 PM »
who has win98 and feels daring ? :)

Errrrm...  well, on a quick (like 30-second) test, at least the basic features seem to work   :)