Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
ERAM (Open Source RAM Disk) Development
wraith808:
https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=21947.msg372109#msg372109
https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=23480.msg214378#msg214378
https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=23705.msg215157#msg215157
It was ugly, and it turned DCers into something I hadn't seen on DC. So that's the reason we're being a bit pedantic about it. I personally don't want to see that happen here again.
Zero3K:
Yeah, that was bad. So, I take it that no one wants to try improving it?
wraith808:
Yeah, that was bad. So, I take it that no one wants to try improving it?
-Zero3K (June 26, 2016, 08:35 PM)
--- End quote ---
Improving... what?
Zero3K:
Yeah, that was bad. So, I take it that no one wants to try improving it?
-Zero3K (June 26, 2016, 08:35 PM)
--- End quote ---
Improving... what?
-wraith808 (June 26, 2016, 09:55 PM)
--- End quote ---
The driver. It would be nice if the BSOD I saw on a 64-bit OS was fixed so that way I can see if the speed is improved over what I got when I benchmarked it in a 32-bit OS.
f0dder:
3. I still think that there's more speed to get out of this driver when it works properly on a 64-bit OS.-Zero3K (June 26, 2016, 05:18 PM)
--- End quote ---
You seem somewhat obsessed about this particular RamDisk - why? Even according to benchmark you attached, it doesn't seem to be anything special... and it has a nasty CPU spike (might be a glitch - the benchmark doesn't strike me as being particularly thorough).
For people to want to spend their time improving something, there has to be some motivation. The uncertain license status is a turn-off, and in general it just seems more worthwhile to contribute to something not dead, like ImDisk.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version