Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
raffle/random choice software
mouser:
Aryq's suggestion of random.org is a good one if you are simply trying to choose m winners from a group of n entrants.
There are a few specialized cases where you may need to look deeper:
1. If you want to select winners not purely randomly, but with some weighted probabilities -- for example if you wanted the chance that an entrant to win to be based on how many years they have been in operation, etc. [doesn't sound like you need this].
2. If you needed to be able to *prove* to some third party rigorously that you only ran the random selection once and these are the independently verified results. [doesn't sound like you need this].
3. If you were going to be running multiple giveaways over time and wanted to make it less likely that people would win twice in a row, etc. [doesn't sound like you need this].
ayryq:
1. If you want to select winners not purely randomly, but with some weighted probabilities -- for example if you wanted the chance that an entrant to win to be based on how many years they have been in operation, etc. [doesn't sound like you need this].
-mouser (June 09, 2015, 08:32 AM)
--- End quote ---
You could simulate this by just assigning (some) entrants multiple entry numbers.
Joe Hone:
Thanks for the suggestions, if random.org doesn't seem right I'll ask for a Coding Snack.
The awards are going to be given for a few years, and winning disqualifies the recipient from winning again for 36 months. I guess the foundation will track entrants to prevent multiple wins by an applicant during the disqualification period.
ayryq:
One more thing about random.org:
They have a paid winner-picking service: "The Draw Service offers a high level of transparency to your entrants and also protects you against accusations of tampering by storing a record of the results on RANDOM.ORG."
For fewer than 500 entries (and as many winners as you like) the cost is $4.95. Looks like you can upload a list of entrants (rather than just numbers) as well.
https://www.random.org/faq/#S5
mouser:
nice -- so that takes care of my point #2 above.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version