Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
which file format is more accurate to save webpages?
kalos:
hello!
which file format is more accurate to save webpages?
that it will lossly save all the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc, so that I will archive the webpage in fully functional form, offline
thanks!
rgdot:
Why format? I think you should be thinking of a tool that downloads the pages you need well. I use HTTrack, I think it does a good job http://www.httrack.com/
SKA:
mht is a single file format supported by most browsers(also Opera)
Ska
kalos:
as you can see here there are numerous:
which should I choose?
tomos:
Kalos, you are asking different questions ...
Rgdot answered your first question
-
which file format is more accurate to save webpages?
that it will lossly save all the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc, so that I will archive the webpage in fully functional form, offline-kalos (April 08, 2013, 04:53 PM)
--- End quote ---
no one filetype can save "the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc".
Re your second question - what exactly do you want to save?
And a question for you:
how come you have all those option in your Fifefox 'save as' dialogue and I only have three :tellme:
which file format is more accurate to save webpages?
:)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version