Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion

which file format is more accurate to save webpages?

(1/5) > >>

kalos:
hello!

which file format is more accurate to save webpages?

that it will lossly save all the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc, so that I will archive the webpage in fully functional form, offline

thanks!

rgdot:
Why format? I think you should be thinking of a tool that downloads the pages you need well. I use HTTrack, I think it does a good job http://www.httrack.com/

SKA:
  mht is a single file format supported by most browsers(also Opera)

Ska

kalos:
as you can see here there are numerous:

which should I choose?

tomos:
Kalos, you are asking different questions ...
Rgdot answered your first question
-
which file format is more accurate to save webpages?

that it will lossly save all the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc, so that I will archive the webpage in fully functional form, offline-kalos (April 08, 2013, 04:53 PM)
--- End quote ---

no one filetype can save "the webpage and its related files, eg videos, scripts, etc".

Re your second question - what exactly do you want to save?
And a question for you:
how come you have all those option in your Fifefox 'save as' dialogue and I only have three :tellme:

which file format is more accurate to save webpages?

:)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page