Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room
3D Printing Under Attack
Stoic Joker:
Sad truth is, weapons acquisition is driven by a need - real or perceived - to have a fallback in an emergency.
The only way they're ever going to get a handle the number of guns on the street is if the powers that be finally start addressing the root causes behind it. Most people I know prefer not to own or carry a gun. But I'm seeing and hearing of more and more people who used to be adamantly opposed to "having a weapon in the house" now seriously considering getting one and learning how to use it.
Maybe the time has come to drop the glittering generalities and propaganda and start some genuine dialog about why this is happening?-40hz (October 15, 2012, 12:41 PM)
--- End quote ---
(Desperate times/Desperate measures...) Amen to that.
Renegade:
And the FSF steps into the foray:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121017/06533320729/free-software-foundation-certifies-3d-printer-why-that-matters.shtml
Free Software Foundation Certifies 3D Printer -- And Why That Matters
from the I'm-sorry,-Dave,-I'm-afraid-I-can't-do-that dept
Last week Mike wrote about a new patent from Intellectual Ventures that seeks to assert ownership of the idea of DRM for 3D printing. The article in Technology Review that Techdirt linked to explains how things would work:
"You load a file into your printer, then your printer checks to make sure it has the rights to make the object, to make it out of what material, how many times, and so on," says Michael Weinberg, a staff lawyer at the nonprofit Public Knowledge, who reviewed the patent at the request of Technology Review. "It’s a very broad patent."
That's a pretty obvious approach, which any halfway competent engineer would come up with, so it's hard to see how it was ever granted a patent. But leaving aside this familiar problem with the patent system, there's an important issue skated over in the above explanation. It assumes that the printer has the power to disobey you -- that is, to refuse to print out an object that you want, because of the DRM in the file describing it, or because it doesn't have DRM at all. This parallels the situation for computers, where DRM is based on the assumption that your computer is not fully under your control, and has the ability to ignore your commands. That's one of the reasons why free software is so important: it is predicated on the idea that the user is always in control.
Against the background of the new 3D-printing patent, this announcement from the Free Software Foundation (FSF) that it has recently certified a 3D printer made by Aleph Objects as "respecting the user's freedom", takes on a particular significance:
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today awarded its first Respects Your Freedom (RYF) certification to the LulzBot AO-100 3D Printer sold by Aleph Objects, Inc. The RYF certification mark means that the product meets the FSF's standards in regard to users' freedom, control over the product, and privacy.
Here are the FSF's criteria for making the award:
The desire to own a computer or device and have full control over it, to know that you are not being spied on or tracked, to run any software you wish without asking permission, and to share with friends without worrying about Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) -- these are the desires of millions of people who care about the future of technology and our society. Unfortunately, hardware manufacturers have until now relied on close cooperation with proprietary software companies that demanded control over their users. As citizens and their customers, we need to promote our desires for a new class of hardware -- hardware that anyone can support because it respects your freedom.
That is, in making the award, the FSF has established that the LulzBot remains fully under the user's control.
Until now, that hasn't been an issue -- there's no practical way to stop someone from simply downloading a file and then printing it out on a compatible 3D printer. But the patent from Intellectual Ventures is the first step towards a time when users of 3D printers will be confronted with issues of control in exactly the same way that computer users are today.
--- End quote ---
Tinman57:
And the FSF steps into the foray:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121017/06533320729/free-software-foundation-certifies-3d-printer-why-that-matters.shtml-Renegade (October 21, 2012, 07:00 AM)
--- End quote ---
I knew the 3D printer was going to be targeted before it even made it to the mainstream. A lot of people don't know, but your regular printer prints a code into every graphic printed so your printer (and you) can be identified for DRM infractions and counterfeiting money. And how do they track it back to you? If you sent in a registration for the printer, or had it factory serviced. Some places like Best Buy actually scans in the printers serial number when you buy it, so it makes it into the records there as well..... And of course if you buy an extended warranty, they got you....
TaoPhoenix:
Slashdot has a story about a (partially) 3d printed plane and it mostly went through, but the slashdot thread went all "over priced, meh". When you can't file the lawsuit, slam it in social media!
http://news.virginia.edu/content/student-engineers-design-build-fly-printed-airplane
Renegade:
Slashdot has a story about a (partially) 3d printed plane and it mostly went through, but the slashdot thread went all "over priced, meh". When you can't file the lawsuit, slam it in social media!
http://news.virginia.edu/content/student-engineers-design-build-fly-printed-airplane
-TaoPhoenix (October 21, 2012, 08:32 PM)
--- End quote ---
That was pretty cool! :)
It won't be overpriced for long, unless some idiotic legislation gets passed to tax 3D printing materials for "copyright" and "patent" infringement the way blank CDs are taxed.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version