ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room

Internet freedoms restrained - SOPA/PIPA/OPEN/ACTA/CETA/PrECISE-related updates

<< < (47/79) > >>

Tinman57:
"Our allies in the House and Senate?" This sounds like they are at war - they have allies in the US Government.
If it is a war, then who is the enemy? The US Government?
But that can't be right, can it?    :tellme:
-IainB (February 03, 2013, 06:36 PM)
--- End quote ---

  Others in the house/senate that have the opposite opinion...

IainB:
... Others in the house/senate that have the opposite opinion...
-Tinman57 (February 03, 2013, 08:09 PM)
--- End quote ---

I sort of referred to this here:
...It might be such simple practicalities, or citizens' unfounded opinions, or their religio-political ideologies that make them potentially Enemies of the Constitution: (refer the post in the spoiler below, and read the interesting comments too)

...One of the things that confuzzles me is that I had thought (perhaps mistakenly?) that US lawmakers and federal and local government officials - including the President, Senators, the judicary, sherifs, etc. - held office on condition/promise that they would serve and protect the people, and uphold and defend the Constitution, or something. So, if they are not doing that - for whatever reason - then does it mean that they secured their position in the first place under false pretences? If that is the case, then does that mean that they are removed from office and that the  bad laws they pushed through will be repealed? I don't get any sense that either of these things happen in practice...
-IainB (February 05, 2013, 06:00 PM)
--- End quote ---

IainB:
It looks like The ACTA Blog is monitoring a developing EU-US situation:
ACTA rises?

Renegade:
It looks like The ACTA Blog is monitoring a developing EU-US situation:
ACTA rises?
-IainB (February 06, 2013, 02:45 AM)
--- End quote ---

Aaaaaannnnnddddd........ Right back to the point about having extreme, long lasting obsessions being a characteristic of a psychopath.

They will never stop. They are purely psychopathic. Such is the nature of "The Corporation".

IainB:
@Renegade: Yes, you may well be right, but the criteria are different:
In the film The Corporation, they reviewed the personality disorder "psychopathy". (A psychopath is a person with chronic psychopathy, esp. leading to abnormally irresponsible and antisocial behaviour.)
They gave this checklist of criteria to identify the disorder:
    1. Callous unconcern for the feelings of others.
    2. Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships.
    3. Reckless disregard for the safety of others.
    4. Deceitfulness: repeated lying and conning others for profit/financial gain.
    5. Incapacity to experience guilt.
    6. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviours.

In the film, these criteria were shown to be met by many/most of the legal entities (legal persons) known as "corporations", thus demonstrating that society has legalised these special kinds of psychopaths to operate in society, where they can and do cause tremendous harm - e.g., including such things as economic dependency and control of communities, or a deadly (toxic) environmental footprint - sometimes both, as in the case of the US corporation Exide in their factory in Mexico.
--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version