Google+ Extensions thread

ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion

<< < (10/13) > >>

JavaJones:
Tuxman, I'm not sure your assertions match tested reality:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013-16.html

- Oshyan

Armando:
Thanks for the link. So at least I wasn't dreaming.

Individual configurations can really mess with performance though. And here Firefox is now okay with Google +... Still, Chrome is a tad faster. :D

Tuxman:
Tuxman, I'm not sure your assertions match tested reality:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013-16.html-JavaJones (September 19, 2011, 10:52 PM)
--- End quote ---
Worthless without version numbers. Firefox 3 was slow as hell, Firefox 6 is blazing fast. You see?

Armando:
The version numbers are on page 2 and 4:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013-2.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013-4.html

Tuxman:
I see. Weird results.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version