Other Software > Developer's Corner

Simple Public License (SimPL)

(1/2) > >>

phitsc:
I found the Simple Public License (SimPL) today. Anyone ever heard of it or used it?

http://www.opensource.org/licenses/simpl-2.0.html

Any other news on the license front?

Tuxman:
A CC-licensed license?  :huh:
(Hmm, I still prefer the WTFPL.)

daddydave:
Seems like it's GPL 2.0 without the B.S., in fact I noticed he said in the license it is intended to be equivalent to GPL 2.0.

Tuxman:
The GPL is too restrictive.  :D

daddydave:
The GPL is too restrictive.  :D
-Tuxman (July 21, 2010, 03:33 PM)
--- End quote ---
I'm not a big fan of the the GPL either, but Stallman's "flowery" crap writing style  and manifesto rant to realize what the license is actually saying, so I am all for rewriting it for clarity's sake. Stallman himself should have done so long ago.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page