News and Reviews > Mini-Reviews by Members

Blackbox for windows - shell replacement

(1/2) > >>

f0dder:
Tired of the way the default windows shell looks?

Then try heading over to http://www.bb4win.org/ - a port of blackbox for windows. It's a sort of minimalistic window manager, with pretty modest resource consumption (~10meg working set size, ~6meg private bytes on my machine). It's got skinning support, and is pretty snappy.

It's highly configurable if you don't mind getting your hands a bit dirty, supports multiple virtual desktops, has various plugins for various tasks, support overriding default windows keybindings (like Win+R -> FARR), and should generally just be tried.

You can simply download the zip (I got the bbLean release which is pretty barebone, Xoblite is supposedly more pre-configured), unpack, and run the blackbox exe - no need to replace your default shell right away. You can exit blackbox at any time, and get back to the regular explorer interface.

http://www.xoblite.net has a whole bunch of addtional plugins...

Here's a screenshot of my left monitor (I've got two TFTs) running blackbox with a few apps open. The black bar to the bottom left is "uberbox", a fancier version of the windows "Run" box with aliases and history completion - I'll replace this with FARR soon.

XMinus1:
I believe that I tried BlackBox a couple of years ago, but I've stuck with Litestep.  I first dabbled with shells using GeoShell, a nice, very minimalist alternative to Explorer.  Then I tried LiteStep and never looked back (although, out of curiosity, I have tested out other shells on occasion).  Both Geoshell and Litestep have regularly active IRC channels on Freenode.  Of the two communities, Geoshell is (or at least was a year or so ago) more established as a recognizeable group.

nudone:
please excuse my ignorance but are there any advantages to using something like Litestep or other shells rather than the native operating system shell?

i'm, sort of, keen to try something that will make my system look 'cool' and 'dark'. currently i'm using the 'noire' skin within 'windowblinds' - looks nice but i appreciate that it must be taking up system resources (maybe insignificant) so i'm wondering would a shell that looked similar be a better path to take.

f0dder:
blackbox has a very low footprint; one of the reasons is that it uses gradients and stuff to draw it's skins, rather than bitmaps. It's also nice for me to be entirely rid of explorer.exe (since I use xplorer^2 as my file manager). And replacing win+r with my own custom run bar, and win+e with xplorer^2. These might be doable when using explorer.exe as shell, but it was a no-brainer to do it with blackbox; for explorer I'd have to do some research :)

Changing styles is very fast in blackbox, btw...

nudone:
sounds like a novel way of doing things then f0dder. next rainy day i might give blackbox and litestep a try.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page