Other Software > Developer's Corner

What is the .NET 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 market share?

<< < (2/4) > >>

Lashiec:
Basically, I've seen plenty of freeware/donationware programs requiring .NET 2.0, but I can think of none requiring even 3.0.
-alexey_r (August 05, 2008, 03:43 PM)
--- End quote ---

There are a few, the most prominent of them is Yahoo! Messenger, a specific version for Vista anyway, which is still in beta.

Dormouse:
I'm not sure what they are, but I got 3.0 for something & then upgraded to 3.5 to see if it solved a Circle Dock problem.

alexey_r:
Ok, so there are some... nice to know.

mouser:
once you decide to use .net i don't know why you wouldn't use the most recent version with the newest fancy features.

alexey_r:
See above: 200MB install for 3.5 (less after the Service Pack comes out EDIT: didn't know how small it was, see below) (22 for 2.0, 50 for 3.0).
2.0 is installed already on all XP SP2 computers (and maybe SP1 too, don't remember), 3.0 on all Vista computers.

Sure, if I was writing the program for myself only, or for .Net programmers only, I'd be using the latest version without any hesitation;
but I'm not.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page