Recent Posts

51

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by hamradio on March 31, 2024, 09:17 PM »

In my early tests it works with my simple arguments I tested it with. Will work on polishing it up some. I know you didn’t request it but I have spent time on the themes to where they should look better and cover more of the application. It still won’t be 100% coverage area still but it is closer. Then I removed some themes (like black for one) but added a few like for example a light and a nicer dark theme. Next up is seeing about the shortcut files dropping to add the info in some capacity. That said if you want the changes so far to test in the next couple days or so I will upload a beta.

52

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by ConstanceJill on March 31, 2024, 09:59 AM »

I guess it should be fine, and if even if for whatever reason I couldn't make it work, well as long as it's an option I suppose I could just not enable it

53

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by hamradio on March 31, 2024, 08:47 AM »

Here’s my reasoning for the application launch mode. With the command line window the command is all arguments side. If I am going to skip it then I need a reliable way to tell what the executable is without dealing with the arguments side of things. It basically will have a checkbox which says skip the command window. Then all the arguments you type including the <var> placeholder into what is the command suffix for command window items.

Think I also left the suffix in for the earlier versions before <var> was added just so it didn’t break things.

54

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by ConstanceJill on March 31, 2024, 07:40 AM »

I'm not completely sure what that entails when it comes to running such commands as:

explorer.exe \\target_name_here\C$

since the target's name is usually between the prefix and suffix.

Does that mean the prefix would stop, in this example, at "explorer.exe" and we'd have to insert the target name within the suffix, between "\\" and "\C$", while also making sure that the target's name doesn't get added between "explorer.exe" and " \\" somehow?
If so, then I'm not even sure that the whole prefix and suffix thing makes that much sense any more.

55

General Software Discussion / Re: How to apply complex rules on Ymail emails?

« Last post by 4wd on March 31, 2024, 05:47 AM »

Gmailify

If you have a Yahoo, AOL, Outlook, Hotmail, or select non-Gmail accounts, use Gmailify to get many of Gmail's features with that address.

To do this, link your account to Gmail. After you link your account, you can find your messages in your Gmail inbox, plus these features:

• Spam protection
• Better mail notifications on mobile
• Automatic email sorting based on type (Social, Updates, Promotions)
• Faster search, with advanced search operators

56

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by hamradio on March 30, 2024, 03:45 PM »

Going forward an option to skip the command window will be in. With it enabled only the app should be listed in the prefix then any other arguments for said application in the command suffix.

Does that sound like it would be okay?

57

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by hamradio on March 30, 2024, 11:27 AM »

Yes I've mentioned this thing about the command line window staying open when launching a GUI driven program in message #34, it pretty much always happened for me (or at least since then), no matter which OS I used the program on.
As a workaround I've been using the "start" command to launch any GUI mode program from CRAP.

I think there must be some other way (maybe an API or something?) that you can use which doesn't rely on CMD at all. It still should be able to run batch scripts and other command line programs just like we do when using the "run" dialog.

-ConstanceJill (March 30, 2024, 02:23 AM)

Well now that I’m reproducing it on my end too I might be able to fix it.

Maybe time for an option to not use CMD.EXE at all in each entry since MS appears to have stopped the one method.

58

Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!

« Last post by 40hz on March 30, 2024, 06:29 AM »

I’ve become  very impressed by a band called The Warning. Three sisters from Mexico who are continuing to bring hard rock to a pop weary world. 

This is them today;

And here’s what they started out from:

In the words of the I Ching: “Persistence furthers.”

59

N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Release: Customizable Remote Administration Panel (CRAP)

« Last post by ConstanceJill on March 30, 2024, 02:23 AM »

Yes I've mentioned this thing about the command line window staying open when launching a GUI driven program in message #34, it pretty much always happened for me (or at least since then), no matter which OS I used the program on.
As a workaround I've been using the "start" command to launch any GUI mode program from CRAP.

I think there must be some other way (maybe an API or something?) that you can use which doesn't rely on CMD at all. It still should be able to run batch scripts and other command line programs just like we do when using the "run" dialog.

60

PublicDomainVic / Re: Paradisus Software

« Last post by publicdomain on March 29, 2024, 08:52 PM »

The new GitHub account is created and the first repository is open:

https://github.com/paradisusis/file-session-tracker

Also, the matching "paradisusvic" user @ Reddit is active:

https://github.com/paradisusis/file-session-tracker

Our twitter (now X) has been rebranded:

https://twitter.com/paradisusis/

The project keeps shaping and moving forward...