topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday April 16, 2024, 12:24 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dormouse [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 ... 78next
1126
There's no temptation for me to upgrade since I haven't used it in quite a while.
They are probably having to get a lot more out of each active user/customer now since I suspect the number of users has dropped a lot since the coming of Lastpass.

1127
General Software Discussion / Re: Liquid Story Binder: Excellent
« on: December 10, 2010, 08:30 AM »
I used to own a copy of LSB some time ago. I got it as a free one-day promo from the GOTD website. Unfortunately, I didn't realize the license was only for that version. So when I innocently upgraded it to the new edition that came out a few weeks later, I lost the free license.

Actually, iirc, the GOTD promo also gave a lifetime license. He changed the license code system soon after and you had to send an email to get a new code. Really good guy and deserves the support from people buying the prog.

1128
Personally, I use Scenalyzer Live for transferring DV to the computer - nothing comes close to the ease with which this program works.  If you use MiniDV at a consumer level then quite frankly, I don't know how you can not use this program.  It makes the first step of choosing what to keep/remove so much easier.

Do you use the free or shareware version. I note that even the paid version is five years old & pre Vista & 7.

1129
Living Room / Re: Connections problem has me stumped ...
« on: December 07, 2010, 12:04 PM »
What do you use to download? Have you tried a download manager?

1130
General Software Discussion / Re: Fastest Audio Converter
« on: December 07, 2010, 11:36 AM »
If you control the whole chain, could you not record directly into mp3s?

1131
General Software Discussion / Re: Fastest Audio Converter
« on: December 07, 2010, 04:21 AM »
Today we only offer our sermon recordings as "1 sermon = 1 CD".

That could be a very long sermon indeed if its done as a low quality mp3  ;D

1132
If you are concerned that v4 might never see the light of day, you could always wait for the pre=release to come out. The implication seems to be that the new pricing will only come with the actual release. OTOH, the lifetime offer could go any time.

1133
Living Room / Re: iPod - tell me why I should buy one
« on: November 17, 2010, 02:08 AM »
Phones are a bad way to go. Their batteries just don't stand up enough for media playback. Especially video.

 :huh:

I carry a spare battery and & have a charger in my car. Rarely need to use either (Android phone - HTC Desire). Listen to music on it much of the day, though don't often do videos. The GPS probably drains the battery faster than anything & I use that quite a lot some days if I'm not in my own car. The saving of weight & number of gadgets to carry is well worthwhile. Calls automatically interrupting/resuming the music is a good bonus which saves extra faffing around. I wish I'd done this earlier.

1134
General Software Discussion / Re: What's the best The BAT! version?
« on: November 09, 2010, 01:20 PM »
For me, there is nothing better nor worse with the version that I use to 4.0.34


1135
General Software Discussion / Re: What's the best The BAT! version?
« on: November 08, 2010, 02:34 PM »
I knew that posting about Outlook would be controversial ...  So be it! I like Outlook  :-[

I don't know about controversial, just something I've never quite been able to understand. And you are in good company, because Carol also likes it, IIRC. For me, it has always caused headaches or frustrations on a reasonably regular basis which other progs haven't. But, if that's not your experience, then it certainly makes sense to use something you have already installed. And if you LOVE it, you won't want to be without it anyway - for better or worse   ;D

1136
General Software Discussion / Re: What's the best The BAT! version?
« on: November 08, 2010, 02:07 PM »
@ Everyone who use(ed) "The BAT!" - Could you please extend the courtesy of editing your posts to include the version number you are using?  Just saying "the latest version" is not very helpful, especially given Ritlab's versioning?

I assumed that the "latest version" statement basically meant including the last paid update, rather than not. Not necessarily a simple matter since that didn't come as a vanilla v4.
Anyway, I'm currently on 4.2.36.4; which is the latest version.

1137
General Software Discussion / Re: What's the best The BAT! version?
« on: November 08, 2010, 03:50 AM »
I'm always surprised to see people recommending Outlook. I've used all versions and it is still feature-lite (needing other programs be bought to make it properly useful) and gets bogged down when there is too much data. I've never understood the attraction to non-corporates, although I can see that its ubiquity can make a good pipe between two useful programs.

With email, I have for a long time run at least 3 main progs concurrently (gives me cover in case something goes wrong with one). One webmail (currently Gmail); one main productivity (currently The Bat!) and one alternative (currently Opera, used to be TB). I tend to used Mailstore and Archivarius as extra stores and search engines.

I am on the latest version of TheBat! because I got it extra-ordinarily cheap. It works perfectly well, but I would probably not have upgraded at a noticeable cost; I would never upgrade early in the product life cycle because new versions can have teething problems. I don't really worry about upgrades because the current version is very robust for me and does everything I need. Very configurable. Rather old-fashioned look and interface, but I can live with that. It must be doing something right to be, it seems, the last of the paid for pure email programs. OTOH, that does cause a slight concern about the long-term viability of its business model.

TB just seemed increasingly pointless. Too slow and heavy and added no extra functionality.

1138
General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos
« on: November 06, 2010, 12:09 PM »
Is the content-aware feature in the Adobe Photoshop CS5 video on Youtube (here) bogus?  If not, this would seem to be the ideal tool for that. Is it available yet?

Content-aware also in PSE9.


1139
"This domain is expired". Oops!  :tellme:  

November 1, 2010
GOTD is expired?..

Hello everybody,

we are aware of the situation with Giveaway of the Day site and are sorry for the inconvenience. Our domain record domain was supposed to auto-renew but failed for some reasons that have yet to be investigated.

Let us assure you that domain has successfully been renewed, still the system needs time to get the site back to proper work.

For those users who still experience problems with access to GOTD, please stay on-line or try to reach us in several hours. We will finally be back! :)

Have a nice day!
GOTD project team
-GOTD blog

 :huh: indeed

1140
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« on: October 31, 2010, 09:03 AM »
in the eyes of the consumer if nothing changes visually or functionally, then it does not.

But surely that is OK? Consumer does not think it is worth upgrading (quite understandably atm) and so does not upgrade.

But GemX are saying that they anticipate frequent updates to v4. This means it will be very hard to find a point at which the extra features justify the upgrade unless they artificially delay releasing new versions. This is the first real upgrade for quite a few years. I decided to upgrade this time, partly to show some support and trust and partly to support the reasonable upgrade pricing. We'll see if it was worth it some time, but there's nothing that makes it compelling now - but I still understand why it's an appropriate point to say it is a major version change.

1141
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« on: October 31, 2010, 06:17 AM »
My impression, without having used it, is did this require a version bump to 4?

Well, if a complete rewrite of the majority of the code does not justify a major version upgrade, then what does?

Certainly v4 is functionally virtually identical to v3 (& v3 works find on W7 x64 for me). Equally certainly, no-one has to upgrade. At some stage of v4, there may be some new features that you do want to upgrade for - and you can do it then. But I'm not sure how they would choose exactly which new features would justify a version upgrade; it seems easier to me to do what they have done and make it a major version change now, and leave users to decide if and when to upgrade. I don't think they could defer a new version any longer without losing even more users, so it is good that it is out there. And the upgrade price is very reasonable.

1142
Living Room / Re: build/upgrade or buy/build a new one?
« on: October 18, 2010, 02:29 AM »
First, I'm not sure what you mean by your PC is showing its age & needs to improve. 18 months isn't that old, especially for non-gaming activity.

Second, all your components seem, from a superficial look, to be similar in standard - and therefore probably hard to improve by tackling one or two areas. Would be more cost-effective, when the time comes, to do a full upgrade.

That said, I agree completely with Renegade. A SSD works very much faster and is worth the money (certainly to me, & unlike him I did go for one when I built my last computer & have my OS & programs on it (& nothing else).

You could consider moving to W7 at the same time. And more RAM might help a bit, depending on what you do.

1143
The problem is you need a separate app for each of them and not all services provide one.  On the iPhone, the generic email app allows me to consolidate my Yahoo, Hotmail, GMail, Exchange, and any other IMAP or POP3 email account (up to 4 accounts) into the one app.  I can likewise download separate apps if that works better.  With the Android platform I *MUST* create a GMail account and I *MUST* register and use it for many different uses, even if I already have several email accounts and don't want to use GMail (which I don't).  With the Apple platform (Gah, I am already starting to sound like a fanboy, yuk! - <washes mouth out with soap....comes back to finish typing>) I do need to create an Apple account for the iPhone/iPod Touch, but then I don't need to ever use it again (except for any iTunes/app store "purchases").  All email communication comes in on any email service I prefer, and in fact I have no Apple email service at all.
The app on mine will manage all my email accounts if I want.
Android does require a gmail account (& Google Checkout) for the Market. No different to Apple in that. No need to use it. All email can be through any service you want. And I suspect you can get manage it differently, and outside Google, if you want.
Maybe the Android phone you had wasn't the same as mine.

As for the apps that claim to sync, I don't recall Fliq, but I know CompanionLink is VERY expensive ($40+ USD)  and really doesn't fully sync.  I think it syncs emails, but my main concern was with contact lists and calendars and it didn't do calendar syncing at all IIRC. Must have been thinking of a different app I tried.  However, to make it even more expensive, not only is this app $40, but then you needed to get DejaOffice on top of that.  Don't know how much more that would cost.

Just looking at Fliq real quick already shot it down.  Need a Fliq account and must sync with the account, not just between Outlook and the Device.  I can already do that if I am willing to go through GMail and use that as the common hub instead. Guess I really do need to read closer.  But this app too is quite expensive.  If I had seen it when I had my android device, though, I might have given it a whirl and seen if that would have satisfied my needs.

DejaOffice is free (approx $10 to for no adds). But it isn't actually required if you are happy to sync with the Android apps & Google. $40 is quite a lot - but they charge the same for the iOS version.

These apps are quite expensive in app terms - but no different to the standard pricing for WM programs really. And only a small part of the price differential between Apple and Android.

I'm quite happy having a lot of things going through my gmail account and that works out free. I have some email accounts I keep completely separate, so I do that too. If I used Outlook, I could set up a system to sync with that too if I wanted. The only point I'm making is that there is no reason to be locked into Google just because you have an Android phone. And, because it is OpenSource, I'm sure that all needs will be met by someone as the Android App market develops.

1144
The problem with Android is that the Android platform locks you in every bit as the Apple platform, and worse, doesn't have anything to allow you to sync with Outlook at all (again, there is an exception IF you use an Exchange Server)!  If you wanted to program your own, sure, but then you could do that with any system and wouldn't really be looking here (at least I would think you wouldn't).  With the Android platform, the only difference is instead of being held to the Apple Hardware (but able to use just about any software you want), you are able to use any hardware that will support the Android platform, but you are locked into Google.  All mail pretty much MUST go through GMail (there are some email apps out there for other platforms such as Yahoo and Hotmail, but they are little more than shortcuts to the web version).

I don't really understand any of this. I have an Android phone and I'm not locked in. Email apps are available and easy to sync with any email provider that you are using.

I haven't looked at syncing with Outlook, since that is the last thing I want to do. But I've seen references to CompanionLink and Fliq which claim to sync.

1145
Living Room / Re: I have a very hard announcement to make
« on: October 14, 2010, 02:42 AM »
Saddened to read this. If coding makes you feel like that, then stopping must be the right decision (for now at least); especially if it isn't getting you where you want to go. Truly hope everything goes well for you and that you do stay around here where you contribute so much.

1146
LeaderTask (free on GOTD today) seems to have what you are looking for. Tasks, notes, calendar & contacts. Syncs with Outlook and Gmail.

And free; today at least.

1147
EDITED: On second thought, if it has calendar by way of the Lightning add-on, it should have tasks, too.

Indeed.


1148
Spicebird attempts to do this. Development has been rather spasmodic but appears to be continuing.

I suspect the easiest sync approach is through gmail, but that does mean having everything in the cloud and again probably won't cover everything (I've not tried).

1149
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Vectorian Giotto-50% Discount
« on: October 05, 2010, 09:55 AM »
I can't see it now either. But I'm sure I also saw it there earlier today with a few comments.

1150
And everything you do is, of course, collected on their central database.

Source?

Any app can be downloaded to as many devices as you want (well - not sure about that.  Currently my apps are on my iPhone, my wife's iPhone, my old iPod touch which my son has, and my iPad... so at least 4), and if there is a + beside the price, you get the HD and the regular version for the same cost.

Songs on the other hand... you can only get those to another device if you d/l then u/l them, i.e. I d/l a song on my iPhone, then did the same on my wife's, and it charged me twice.  I can, however, d/l it, then sync, then copy it to my wife's computer, then she syncs and it be on both devices... if that isn't strange, I don't know what is...

You can't do this without a database linking your data (songs etc), hardware and customer info.

I'm not implying that they collect other data (I've no idea whether they do or not). Clearly their systems aren't good enough to detect the copying from one computer to another.

Pages: prev1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 ... 78next