topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 19, 2024, 5:54 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - manimatters [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2] 3next
26
General Software Discussion / Re: 1 Tera Byte CD..
« on: April 09, 2008, 10:20 PM »
Never used IsoEdit so not sure what you want to do. I do use IsoBuster and never had any probs with that.
-Carol Haynes (April 07, 2008, 12:23 PM)
What I want to do is insert a folder/file in an iso image, I dont think Isobuster does that(though it does a great job of extracting files from scratched cds).

Do you live near a nuclear power plant?
No, but i think my computer is emitting ultraradio-ultraactive rays..

Please may I have a couple of the CDs from that spindle?  :Thmbsup:
Sure, ill just pack them in a radiation proof box and tell me where to teleport them!


27
Yeah, even I could only find v1.1a beta.

28
General Software Discussion / 1 Tera Byte CD..
« on: April 07, 2008, 12:18 PM »
When I saw this, I had to post this, take a look at the attached image,

I burned an iso file (about 250 MB) to a 700 MB disk, and now, when I insert the disk, the disk size is reported to be 1 TB!!! Thats 50 times greater than my hard disk! whew, its one of those things that make you go "Oh my God!" with a smile on your face.

The thing is that i edited the iso file with Isoedit (inserted a folder in it), that is what I think caused such a behaviour. This has caused me to lose trust on that program, can you suggest any alternatives??

29
General Software Discussion / Re: CD Cataloger
« on: April 06, 2008, 10:41 PM »
you can check this thread for Crush's list of over 200 catalogers.

on the other hand, you seem to have already found the solution.
yup, ive found it alright, thats why i loove this place :-*! You guys are wonderful. :Thmbsup:!!

30
Lazycat can perfectly do what you want. It´s one of the best of my disc-cataloger tests. Try to get V1.2beta. It´s shareware but has no limit. The development has been stopped 8 years ago  :(

Thanks, i've downloadede Lazycat, its perfect for me. Ive got V1.1beta, its shareware, but i dont know if it has a limit or not.

31
Something that would make a disk cataloging software more usable for me would be the ability to detect whenever any disk is inserted and then popup to ask if that is to be cataloged, if not already done so. It could sit in the system tray to do that as long as it doesnt slow up the system. Any one support that?

32
General Software Discussion / Re: CD Cataloger
« on: April 06, 2008, 06:11 AM »
Ill give it a spin, maybe I can come up with something..

33
General Software Discussion / CD Cataloger
« on: April 05, 2008, 09:44 AM »
Hey guys, is there any piece of software that can AUTOMATICALLY catalog any cds I insert in my CD Drive. By automatically, I mean whenever I insert a cd, it should prompt me weather i want to catalog the cd i've inserted. That kind of tool would make cataloging much much more easier!

I think theres also a manual way to add a command to any program (in my case the cataloging program) to the auto insert notification that pops up if i enable autorun on my cd drive, but I dont exactly know how, any suggestions to where i can read on this?

34
System Explorer (http://systemexplorer.mistergroup.org/) is free and can log all sorts of stuff on your system including system traffic.

I'm not sure how big the log files will get but I'd guess you could write a script to process the output into the sort of thing you need.

For example here is a short log created on my network connections whilst running uTorrent to download a couple of files:

List: History
Created : 04/04/2008 11:14:53

Time | Type | Value |
11:14:52 | Net | Del lairdswood:2868 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:52 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 SYN_RCVD PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:51 | Net | Del lairdswood:2862 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:51 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2868 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:51 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2867 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:50 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:50 | Net | Del lairdswood:2860 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:50 | Net | Del lairdswood:2859 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:2772 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:2769 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2862 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2859 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2866 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2861 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2865 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2863 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2864 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:49 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2860 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:48 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:48 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:48 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:43 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:42 | Net | Del lairdswood:2809 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:42 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 LAST_ACK PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:42 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:33 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:31 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:30 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:25 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:24 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:21 | Net | Del lairdswood:2755 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:21 | Net | Del lairdswood:2760 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:21 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:20 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 FIN_WAIT1 PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:19 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 SYN_RCVD PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:14 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:1101 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:2840 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:2846 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:1101 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:1102 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:2849 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:1103 FIN_WAIT2 PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:13 | Net | Del localhost:2850 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:14:09 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 SYN_RCVD PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:08 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:07 | Net | Del lairdswood:2852 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:07 | Net | Del lairdswood:2853 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:06 | Net | Del lairdswood:2858 LAST_ACK PID=TCP/IP "3180" |
11:14:05 | Net | Del lairdswood:2855 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:14:05 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2858 LAST_ACK PID=TCP/IP "3180" |
11:14:04 | Net | Del lairdswood:2842 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:04 | Net | Del lairdswood:2847 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:14:00 | Net | Del lairdswood:2857 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | Del lairdswood:2838 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | Del lairdswood:2839 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | Del lairdswood:2835 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | Del lairdswood:2837 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2854 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2856 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2855 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:57 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2857 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:54 | Net | Del localhost:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | Del localhost:2844 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:54 | Net | Del lairdswood:2845 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2851 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2853 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2850 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1103 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2852 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2849 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1102 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:54 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2848 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:53 | Net | Del localhost:2841 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:53 | Net | Del localhost:1102 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:53 | Net | Del lairdswood:2843 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:53 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2847 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:53 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:53 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2846 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:52 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2845 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:52 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2844 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:52 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2843 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1102 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2841 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2842 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:2840 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:51 | Net | New 127.0.0.1:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:50 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2836 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:50 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2837 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:50 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2835 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:50 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2839 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:50 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2838 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:49 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:46 | Net | Del lairdswood:2700 LAST_ACK PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:46 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2833 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:43 | Net | Del lairdswood:2571 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:43 | Net | Del localhost:2570 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "4768" |
11:13:43 | Net | Del localhost:1101 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "1912" |
11:13:40 | Net | Del lairdswood:2831 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:40 | Net | Del lairdswood:2830 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:40 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:39 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:39 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2830 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:39 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:2831 SYN_SENT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:37 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:37 | Net | Del lairdswood:2764 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:33 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 CLOSE_WAIT PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:26 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:20 | Net | Del lairdswood:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |
11:13:19 | Net | New 192.168.0.151:12345 ESTABLISHED PID=TCP/IP "2676" |

The only problem is that it doesn't seem to show the IPs or URLs connected to though you might be able to persuade the developer to add the feature - he seems very open to ideas.
-Carol Haynes (April 04, 2008, 05:20 AM)

It doesn't show the amount of data downloaded. But its a very fine piece of software for monitoring purposes.

35
I can't point you to anything, but it sounds like a GREAT Firefox plugin.  Perhaps someone there has already made something like this?  For Opera, on the other hand, I can't imagine where to start looking since they don't have a plugin architecture.
I wonder if there is a software that records your surfing habits globally(independent of browser). Ive seen network monitors tell me the address of the location from where data is being downloaded, but now I cant remember which ones had that capability. All that is needed then is to record that data and compile it.

36
Hey guys, im looking for a software which can keep track of my downloaded data volume grouped by the site address. I know its kind of specific, but i think there might be utilities out there that can have the capability.
I love the Opera status bar, which shows the amount of data downloaded on a particular site while opening the page, it would be perfect if it could save that data, and compile it so that the user can see the trends in his surfing habits. Any pointers in this direction?..

37
General Software Discussion / Re: Download Demons...
« on: April 02, 2008, 08:42 PM »
Even I used flashget for sometime, but never updated it. Then, one fine day, after a windows reinstall, i downloaded their newest version, but somehow I didnt like it. One of the few things I remember I hated was that I couldnt set the number of segments for a download after it had started, to change that I had to stop and resume the transfer, and there was something in its appearance that didnt fit in for me. I thought of it as another software (there are so many out there) that had gotten bad, instead of improving in the newer versions.

38
General Software Discussion / Re: Download Demons...
« on: April 02, 2008, 09:00 AM »
I tried out a whole bunch of them download managers (again)! with a few ones i hadnt tried before. This time around, my search for "The Ultimate Download Demon" has finally ended. Its "Getright", it has all the options i could think of i wanted, plus has a very neat interface, isnt tough on resources, you can tell it to ask you weather you want it to download the file for you, or would you rather use the default download dialog(useful for small files), has transparency options which are pretty cool, you can ask it to search for mirrors and select the fastest mirrors, it even can accelerate files based on their size(the number of segments it splits a file into can automatically be varied according to file size), plus a whole lot more. Im pretty much of a choosy person, but this has truly impressed me. Its good guyz.

( a word of caution about Orbit downloader, i lost about 500 mbs of downloaded data because of it, I was downloading a large file about 700 mb's in size in parts(about 50 mbs per day), at about the 500 mb mark, i ran out of disk space on the disk where the file was being stored, and then, without warning, orbit reported that the download failed and whoosh, i couldnt do anything about it, i had to download the whole file from the beginning...!)

39
General Software Discussion / Speed Load
« on: January 07, 2008, 04:05 AM »
Hey guys, yesterday, while browsing through the softwares ive collected, my eyes suddenly went wide open when i read this:-

Speed Load Beta 3

it was a gem and i thought it would sure be popular someday! :)

Heres what the author says on the website:
What is SpeedLoad? 

My experience with install programs has led me to the following conclusion:
90% of them are rubbish!
SpeedLoad monitors a program's activities and then optimises the application so it loads more quickly. If install programs done their job properly SpeedLoad would have nothing to do, but the sad fact is that most of them only do the bare minimum that is required to get the program up and running and little else.

What should a good installer do?

A good installer should do the following (as well as other things required by the software that it is installing):

Ensure that all DLL's the program uses are in different and non-overlapping addresses.
Ensure that the EXE is bound to the DLL's it uses.
The ramifications of the installer not ensuring that (1) is true:

 If two DLL's that a program is using overlap one of them has to be moved. The implications of this are that it takes time to relocate a DLL and secondly every page in the DLL that had to be modified as a result of the relocation process is forced into the page file. This will effect over all system performance, as there is more "load" on the paging system.

The ramifications of the installer not ensuring that (2) is true:

 An EXE maintains a list of functions that it needs from a particular DLL. There are two ways to refer to a function in a DLL. A function can be imported by name or by ordinal. When the system loads a DLL on behalf of the EXE the end result is that the addresses of the functions required by the EXE are inserted into the EXE’s IAT (Import Address Table). Binding is the process of using a pre-built IAT. The system loader checks the time/date stamp (not the time stamp maintained by the file system, an internal time/date stamp that is stored in the DLL which is generated by the linker when the DLL was built) of the DLL and checks that it matches the one that EXE has a pre-built IAT for. If they match the system doesn’t have to build an IAT, it just uses the pre-built one. If functions are imported by name (as is typical) then binding can result in considerable performance increases.

SpeedLoad does its best the ensure that both (1) and (2) are true.


http://www.angelfire...edload/speedload.htm
I remember i noted down somewhere to get the new version when it came out, but sadly it didnt. :o
Although i used it on some exe s that took a long time to load, and it did work for some, had no effect on others and made some others unusable :o (thank God i made backups before experimenting!) ;D

I was wondering why there isnt any other application that does what this software here does? I mean, i did feel "noticable" changes in loading time of some apps (I remember for sure, it helped in reducing the time it took for "TeaTimer" (the system settings protector that comes with Spybot)) to load. It seems as a good idea.

Is there something out there that does that kind of thing?

40
thanks for your suggestions people, i thought i tried some of them already but the new DU meter is cool, a huge improvement over previous versions! ill try netlimiter next!

but can you guys sugget something that can keep track of both my broadband and dialup connection side-by-side, i mean record the amount of recieved data for broadband, and the time online for the dialup one. The DU meter can watch both connections but it mixes the data downloaded fro both the connections, so i dont get to know how much i downloaded via broadband.

or ill have to use something that only works for dialup.

41
Hey guys, im looking for a minimal software that monitors the amount of data downloaded and displays this, preferrably in the system tray. It doesnt have to have the bells and whisles, or even a graph for that matter (read - it shouldn't be a burden on the system) ! It should just record the data downloaded and show daily, weekly and monthly statistics.

The closest ive got to is NetNak, it really is a good piece of software :Thmbsup:, but i think it could be better if it had support for tray icon displaying data downloaded amount. Any suggestions?

42
General Software Discussion / Re: Download Demons...
« on: December 27, 2007, 02:21 PM »
One of the things for which I use a download manager is to gather links while i browse with my broadband which limits my data transferred, so that i can download later all at one go with my other connection which has a limit on the time of usage. 8)


I wonder why DAP has a trace cleaner feature...

why would someone want that?! :eusa_naughty:

I don't usually use a 3rd party downloader. When I do need one, though, I use Stardownloader Pro which sadly appears to have been abandoned. There is also a (likewise abandoned) ad-free freeware version available... http://www.stardownl...er.com/downloads.php

NB while it's effectively been abandoned, it still works well for me!



Ive used stardownloader and what i particularly like about its gui is that its display refreshes faster, so i can look in amazement at the numbers!!


I use Free Download Manager which comes in a lite version with plugins that are in the full version if you don't want all of them.

What is Free Download Manager? It is a powerful, easy-to-use and absolutely free download accelerator and manager. Moreover, FDM is 100% safe, open-source software distributed under GPL license.

FDM is good, but i think its a bit sluggish while loading, im irritated by the flurry of disk activity that occours when i click on a download link! Im a kind of a resource freak, i dont like programs resident in memory, thats why FDM had to start very frequently with me surfing.

Im currently using orbit downloader, mainly because it supports "Social" sites such as rapidshare etc. but i think i need a change, i can do without using a manager for such sites.

43
General Software Discussion / Download Demons...
« on: December 27, 2007, 11:49 AM »
Hey guys,
which program have you used, and are currently using to download stuff from the web?
What are the best and worse "features" according to you?

Ive used many, one of them being DAP(Download Accelerator Plus), was good in downloading, interface was good, but i consider it bloatware, i specially hate the ads it displays on the download progress window, coz i know its stealing my precious bandwidth!

44
General Software Discussion / Re: internet information manager...
« on: December 24, 2007, 02:12 AM »
thanks for the opinions guys. :Thmbsup:

But i think id stick with cogitum cociter for now, its faster (and smaller) than any of the programs mentioned above, and doesnt hog resources. Seeing these actually made me realise that all i want is a basic info manager :-[. i would recommend cociter to any of you guys who feel that the "big guys" are a little too much for them!

45
General Software Discussion / Re: internet information manager...
« on: December 23, 2007, 05:54 AM »
do onenote and evernote save the time of capturing text?

46
General Software Discussion / internet information manager...
« on: December 23, 2007, 05:21 AM »
Hey guys, what are the things you use to keep track of the info you get from the net? I mostly depend on my memory to recall what the name of the software was which i wanted to download, or what the site was which i thought i should add to my bookmarks list, etc. but it aint perfect. I many times have to redo the google searches, trying to put in the exact phrases which i had earlier googled to get to the results, n sumtimes i just forget about the thing completely until i see it again one day and say "I thought i tried that!". I used Cogitum co citer (http://www.cogitum.c...cker-text/more.shtml) for a while before formatting my system and thought it was good :), but i need something with more features. Before reinstalling it i thought it would be better to get second opinions. What do you say?

47
How about Pointabulator!! 8)

48
General Software Discussion / Re: Fantastic: XsX Alphablended Cursors
« on: December 17, 2007, 10:39 AM »
Its a great set. :Thmbsup: Its the only custom cursor set ive tried and its great. Thanks

I think im in love! :-* :-* :-*

49
awesome! thanks.

50
General Software Discussion / Re: Skin Your Shutdown...
« on: November 27, 2007, 09:51 AM »
If you want a noquestions asked type shutdown, just take a look at this:
http://www.xp-smoker.com/freeware.html
Works like lightning. I was in dire need of it because whenever my dad leaves after working on the computer, although he presses the shutdown button, and gives the command to shutdown, but never waits for the computer to actually turn off and turns off the ups power supply. This utility beats my dad to the power button!! :D

Pages: prev1 [2] 3next