21
Living Room / Re: What is appropriate content for DonationCoder?
« on: January 04, 2008, 08:09 AM »
Re: Tagging
For it to work in this kind of community, it must be transparent. The minute somebody suspects they're being labelled "NSFW" or "Potentially Offensive" behind their back trust is broken and cannot be regained. Thus, if tags exist they should be visible. Or, at least, user-configurable to BE visible if desired. Those that think they're noisy can turn displayed tags off.
The tagging system itself should be flexible, with more than just "NSFW". I would like to see a simple text-entry box below the subject line for a new post. The author may type any number of space-delimited keywords into this tag-box, and upon posting, the forum software parses the list and stores the tags in a table (along with pointers to the message, author, and date). ALSO, the processed tags are stored in the message header itself, so that the regular search function can find tags.
The tag table would be very useful. Fun things like tag clouds could be generated, or statistics about who posts the most hardware-related stuff, or lolcats, or whatever.
Now, this may be more controversial, but hear me out...
I think each reply should also have the tag-box too. That way a user can make a rude remark or post a naughty link or whatever and tag the reply so it doesn't corrupt an otherwise clean thread. Better yet, if the topic veers madly off course (that never happens around here) one could tag a reply with new keywords so relevance is maintained.
It would be voluntary, unobtrusive, and take no additional steps or keystrokes than today if somebody thinks tags are dumb. If you DO want to tag something, it's only a few additional keystrokes.
I'm sure lots more could be done with tags, but that's the basics of what I imagined.
For it to work in this kind of community, it must be transparent. The minute somebody suspects they're being labelled "NSFW" or "Potentially Offensive" behind their back trust is broken and cannot be regained. Thus, if tags exist they should be visible. Or, at least, user-configurable to BE visible if desired. Those that think they're noisy can turn displayed tags off.
The tagging system itself should be flexible, with more than just "NSFW". I would like to see a simple text-entry box below the subject line for a new post. The author may type any number of space-delimited keywords into this tag-box, and upon posting, the forum software parses the list and stores the tags in a table (along with pointers to the message, author, and date). ALSO, the processed tags are stored in the message header itself, so that the regular search function can find tags.
The tag table would be very useful. Fun things like tag clouds could be generated, or statistics about who posts the most hardware-related stuff, or lolcats, or whatever.
Now, this may be more controversial, but hear me out...
I think each reply should also have the tag-box too. That way a user can make a rude remark or post a naughty link or whatever and tag the reply so it doesn't corrupt an otherwise clean thread. Better yet, if the topic veers madly off course (that never happens around here) one could tag a reply with new keywords so relevance is maintained.
It would be voluntary, unobtrusive, and take no additional steps or keystrokes than today if somebody thinks tags are dumb. If you DO want to tag something, it's only a few additional keystrokes.
I'm sure lots more could be done with tags, but that's the basics of what I imagined.