topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 19, 2024, 7:11 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Innuendo [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89next
2126
Living Room / Re: D-Link routers vulnerable to remote attack
« on: August 17, 2006, 09:12 PM »
Not all D-Link routers are affected. Some were never affected and some were affected, but have had their firmware patched.  Here's a link to a thread on DSLReports about the problem with replies from a D-Link tech:

http://www.dslreport...orum/remark,16315139

2127
Not my Dell. I got two CDs with my system. One was the Dell Windows Restore CD. This just installed a bog standard Windows installation with the addition of one additional icon on the Start Menu linking to the Support area of Dell's web site. Nothing extra from a store-bought Windows CD installation besides that.

All the "junkware", trialware, etc. came on the second CD. HPs, Compaqs, etc. don't have that luxury, I hear. Heck, I hear some of those systems don't even come with a CD at all. You're at the mercy of a Restore Partition on the computer's hard drive. :: shudder ::

2128
Living Room / Re: Whats on your desktop?
« on: August 14, 2006, 04:18 PM »
Nobody wants to see my desktop. Honest. Truly. Believe me.

I use it as a holding area for all the files and projects I'm working on it is TOTALLY full of file icons & a 1600 x 1200 desktop completely full of icons is truly a scary, uhh...wondrous thing to behold.

2129
I think the kicker in regards to keys online that are not yet blacklisted the key he used was posted online in 2004. This bit of news coupled with the stories going around that non-pirated copies of Windows are being shut down by WGA make a person wonder what's going on in Redmond.

It certainly makes a case for buying a big-name brand PC from some place like Dell. They ship with specially programed Windows CDs that are tied to the BIOS. In the Dell example, if the Dell-branded Windows CD sees a Dell BIOS when you install it then a pre-activated copy of Windows is installed. You never have to deal with activation or WGA.

2130
Lots and lots of good information and posts in this thread. I'll just throw out a few thoughts on some of the things said.

1. Anyone who reviews a beta operating system has no credibility with me. At best it should be called a preview. Reviews are only for final products.

2. As a beta tester of many Microsoft operating systems I can tell you that until RC1 hits any feature can change, be removed or have its implementation changed at a moment's notice. Writing this kind of article about what consumers won't like about the upcoming OS is pointless at this point in the game. When the next build rolls out to testers, things could be radically different in any aspect.

3. As shocking as it may sound to some there are actually some people who are not fans of the Apple Way of doing things. Some people think stainless steel skins with pinstriped backgrounds are not the pinnacle of UI design but look rather tacky & gaudy.

4. There's no way on God's green Earth Apple is ever going to sell OS X as a version that can run on any PC. What profit they'd make in extra copies sold would be more than eaten up by the losses they'd take by the amount of money they'd lose in hardware sales. If you see two computers side by side both capable of running OS X equally well, but one costs $2,000 and the other costs $1,000. Which one are you going to buy? Hint: You're going to buy the one that does not have the Apple logo on the case. If you also factor in the time, money, and research Apple would have to put into writing drivers for every conceivable piece of hardware available for the PC world & the testing of OS X to be able to work on those countless myriad configurations, you can see why Apple's in favored of their closed black box, errr...white box system.

5. Don't believe the OS X propaganda. Find an honest Mac user and you'll discover that OS X is slow...even a lumbering ox under some situations & under some circumstances crash just as often as Windows XP. I have never had a bit of trouble with my XP installation with blue screens & what-not, but there are some XP users that have nothing but trouble. Guess what? The Mac world is full of both kinds of people as well, those that never have crashes & those that have nothing but crashes.

6. Not mentioned anywhere in the thread, but on a related note, Apple is running a huge advertising campaign in the U.S. right now on television about how Macs never crash, they're superior, etc. Walk into nearly any store that sells computer software & you can see right away why Macs don't crash. A computer can't crash when it has no software available to run on it.  ;D  Seriously, though, in every store I venture into I see row upon row & aisle upon aisle of software for PC compatibles & never a single software package for the Mac. Unless one is a masochist, why lock one's self out of what 98% of the world uses & prevent yourself from using 98% of the software that's avaiable?

Bottom line is I don't see what is special about this Scott Finnie character. He's just a muppet with a web site...something anybody can accomplish with a few dollars a month.

2131
First of all I have never heard of this Scott Finnie character before & having read his articles I think he's a bit of a flake. I'm going to take the opposite side of the table when it comes to silent operation of my AV. I want dialogs. I want notifications. If a virus is detected, a file is deleted, or a file is moved to quarantined or renamed, I *WANT* to know. I don't want my AV doing things behind my back. I want to be kept in the loop.

RE: The NOD32 interface. If you think v2.x is bad you should have seen v1. All the modules were separate and you had an icon in your system tray for each one.

RE: Checking outgoing mail. Unnecessary, IMHO. Anything that is going to be outgoing has to make it past the resident file system monitor. If it checked outgoing attachments, too, with the email module that'd be double the work for no benefit at all.

2132
I use Miranda. I use it for ICQ, Yahoo!, and two instances of MSN.

It's brilliant, freeware, and has a cubic butt-load of plugins.  :Thmbsup:

2133
General Software Discussion / Re: Most under-rated media player?
« on: January 28, 2006, 01:16 PM »
I haven't looked at it yet, but it'd have to go a long way to beat Media Player Classic.

2134
General Software Discussion / Re: Badware
« on: January 28, 2006, 01:15 PM »
Then they'd have to list every program Symantec sells. :P

2135
General Software Discussion / Re: SQX format for compression
« on: January 21, 2006, 06:42 PM »
Zip is old and outdated & not to mention the author is dead. PKWare is just coasting on past glory and eventually something will overtake it. RAR is gaining ground every day. Even the newbie 7zip is making inroads.

I prefer one tool for all my unarchiving needs as well & I chose PowerArchiver. It's got a nice looking GUI, supports almost all known formats, and even has a unique icon for each archive format.

I trust RAR for my data more than I trust Zip....and I trust them both more than some off-the-wall compression algorithm concocted by a code thief.

2136
patteo is 100% correct with his post and his links. Don't ever use CD/DVD labels unless it's something you don't care about losing or it is a disc that is only going to see short-term use. The dangers of using those labels vastly outweigh the advantages.

All audio CD players on the planet and the first CD-ROM/CD-R drives transfer data at a rate of 150 KB/second. That's the reference point for 1x speed. You can extrapolate from that the speeds of 52x or any others.

DVD players and DVD-ROM/DVD-R/DVD-RW drives use a different scale for their x numbers. I want to say 450 KB/second, but I may be misremembering. Using that number a 16x DVD-R drive is going to be as fast as a 48x CD-R drive.

In your example, Carol, that drive can record CDs at up to 52x speed & will read data speeds up to that fast as well. However, if you play an audio CD in it, though, it'll play back at 1x speed. Otherwise, you'd end up with something that sounded like Alvin & the Chipmunks on speed. :)

There are also lots of times that you will not want to record a DVD/CD at the fastest speeds your media and hardware will support, but that's beyond the scope of this post.

2137
General Software Discussion / Re: SQX format for compression
« on: January 21, 2006, 10:58 AM »
SQX is a non-standard file compression format. If the files you are compressing are never going to leave your hard drive I guess it's fine to use, but if you are ever going to send one of those archives to a friend you're either going to need to convert it to something standard or burden your friend with having to go download an odd-ball compression program they'll probably never use again. I guess you could make all of your archives on your hard drive self-extracting, but that adds overhead to the file size because of the extraction code that must be added to every file & then you are defeating the purpose of going with the more efficient compression program in the first place.

On the WWW Zip is the most widely used format. On P2P you'll only see Zip & RAR with RAR outnumbering Zips. On Usenet all you'll see is RAR.

Regarding the RAR support. RAR Labs does not & never has licensed the code to create RAR archives. This joker reverse-engineered WinRAR v1.x in order to add RAR creation support to his program. This is a direct violation of the WinRAR EULA. Only reason he doesn't have support for the latest RAR format is because he's not smart enough to reverse-engineer the latest versions (Eugene beefed up the program's protection).

If you want to support a pinhead who violates software EULAs and goes against the wishes of other software developers when it comes to  their intellectual property that's your business, but I won't be using any of this dill weed's programs.

2138
General Software Discussion / Re: Spy Sweeper Half price
« on: January 17, 2006, 10:48 AM »
Carol,
Some people have the problem & some don't. I even have some PCs that are configured identically & the error only shows up on some of them. I think it's been traced back to that funkadelic interface that Webroot uses.

Custom-skinned software that cannot turn that "function" off leave a bad taste in my mouth anway.

2139
Yes...the Bat! can do it like mouser says, but I can recommend Aid4Mail & Mailbag Assistant for those formats The Bat! does not cover.

2140
General Software Discussion / Re: Spy Sweeper Half price
« on: January 16, 2006, 08:05 PM »
Actually, Carol, renewals are at full price...that half price offer of yours is just for the price of entry, but I just tried the latest version on a PC at work & when I closed it the program would abort with an error every time. I think I'm remembering why I quit using it...

2141
General Software Discussion / Re: Spy Sweeper Half price
« on: January 16, 2006, 10:10 AM »
Spy Sweeper is the best anti-spyware app on the market today & I have tried them all. I have worked on PCs that clients have brought me that are riddled with spyware. Run as many of the other spyware scanning programs you want first...3...5...10. Just run Spy Sweeper last and it'll find spyware the others have missed. I highly recommend it and the only thing that turns me off about the program is the custom non-Windows standard program interface.

As good as your offer is, Carol, I think I have found one better...

http://www.webroot.c.../komando.php?rc=1612

Following this link will give you 2 years of protection for the price of one.

2142
General Software Discussion / Re: SPAMPAL replacement
« on: January 13, 2006, 06:32 PM »
Two things...

SpamPal is very, very light on resources. If your system is slowing to a crawl then you have a rogue plugin running rampant on your system or something else. It's definitely not SpamPal.

Second, IncrediMail is the Devil's work. Honest. Things may have changed, but previous versions of this piece of crapware had spyware built in that reported your program usage and even your emails back to the author & the author even had a provision in his EULA that anything put into an email that is sent by IncrediMail becomes their property to use as they see fit.

2143
The Canadians would never stand a chance. They're too tired from standing in line waiting their turn in the government-subsidized grinder mill that is their healthcare system & what energy they have left they spend wisely on debating amongst themselves about how many languages should be on every public sign & restaurant menu. :)

No...forget Canada. Forget Mexico. Forget the Japanese. And you can even forget the Chinese. More American assets are held by England than any other foreign country. We'd have to fight those red-coats again. :)

2144
vegas,
I'll post my list of software later (if I remember!), but I wanted to make a couple suggestions to you based on your comments in your list.

First off, forget Trillian (Pro). Make the move to Miranda. It does everything the Pro version of Trillian does plus much, much more and is totally free. Frequent updates & it's even open source. It's a wonderful program that is nice & compact unlike the bloat that Trillian has become.

Newsleecher is poo. Flying monkey poo. Program updates are more for updating the intrusive Armadillo copy protection than adding features or fixing bugs. He seems to jump major version numbers for no reason than to try to catch up and surpass his biggest competitor. This handily brings me to what you should replace Newsleecher with....Newsbin Pro! One time price with updates for life....frequent updates as well. The authors are ever-present on the forum & don't disappear for weeks like Newsleecher's author does. Newsbin doesn't phone home every time you launch it, either.

Newsleecher has a prettier interface, but spend a week with both programs and you will get the feeling that Newsbin is a downloading engine first with a user interface tacked on as an after-thought while Newsleecher will give you the feeling that it is a user interface first with a downloading engine tacked on as an after-thought.

I won't even go into the whole fiasco a while back where thousands of Newsleecher users couldn't use the program because everybody's subscription prematurely expired due to the Newsleecher web site going down. Majorly uncool.

2145
Darwin,
Re: WB5...Ohh...I understand now. Post v5 updates. Gotya...

Re: Show Desktop in TLB...I was just getting ready to post that it works fine here when I saw that it is now working fine for you now as well & that it may be a gradual thing that creeps up. I'll keep an eye out for it.

Mouser,
Darwin summed up a lot of strengths of TLB quite well, but I suggest you install it yourself. There's a free trial with no restrictions on usability & that'd be the best way for you to get a grasp on what TLB is capable of doing. We could post all day & not cover everything this little gem can do.

2146
General Software Discussion / Re: Bat question
« on: January 08, 2006, 11:54 AM »
The Bat! does not keep mail account files in its program files folder by default. I think the default location is somewhere under the My Documents heirarchy.

Check your options/preferences to see where mail is stored on your PC (there's like four choices it gives you) and then delete the account from Explorer after you uninstall The Bat!.

2147
General Software Discussion / Re: beeping, cheeping, chirping :-(
« on: January 08, 2006, 11:49 AM »
May be just the excuse you need to blow out the cobwebs by doing a fresh install of Windows. :)

2148
Living Room / Re: sticking two routers together?
« on: January 08, 2006, 11:37 AM »
Hellie,
There's an extremely active Linksys forum over on www.dslreports.com with lots of helpful & knowledgeable people. Every once in a while you'll even see beta versions of firmware that fix problems that are not available to the general public, too.

2149
Darwin,
Time for an upgrade! WindowBlinds came out of beta some time ago. You need to install the final v5.0.

mouser,
I'll mull that request over and get back to you.

2150
superboyac,
Keep the faith in the authors when making suggestions for improvements. I'm the guy responsibile for DO supporting descript.ion files. When version 6.x.x.x came out and DO supported their one proprietary implementation of filenotes I emailed the author suggesting that it'd be infinitely more useful if they supported the industry standard descript.ion files. They had never heard of such & after a few emails exchanged with Dr. Greg Whatshisname (Sorry, can't remember his surname) listing out some of the many programs that supported the file format & a pointer to the inventer of the file format JPSoft's web pages documenting the file structure Dr. Greg wrote me back and said they'd look into including it into DO.

Fast forward many months later when DO v8 was released & voila...descript.ion functionality was included. I thought this was pretty impressive since the first sentence in my first email to the authors stated specifically that I was just a trial user & not a customer.

Oh, and good job on the cloning of Total Commander's interface! If DO could handle archive formats as transparently as TC does I'd seriously consider switching.

Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89next