Messages - Rover [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 124next
101
Living Room / Re: A rant on religiousness about OSes
« on: December 09, 2008, 01:27 PM »
I think you will find this little song appropriate...  :P

Every OS Sucks  -- Three Dead Trolls

102
Developer's Corner / Re: Create your own DynDNS type service
« on: December 04, 2008, 02:47 PM »
hmm.... I'd need more details to understand exactly what you're trying to accomplish, but if it's just for web redirects you could do something like this:

Assuming you have access to a conf.d directory for apache and a hosted server with a static IP and Name.

You can have your remote servers call the static server when their IP address changes.  If they call a php script with the URL they serve, you could update a passthru proxy configuration on apache.  When the static apache server sees a request coming it, redirects to the remote Server.

Sample proxy.conf:

<VirtualHost *>
DocumentRoot /www/docs/host.foo.com
ServerName host.foo.com
ServerAlias host
   ProxyPass         /   http://10.10.123.10/
   ProxyPassReverse  /   http://10.10.123.10/

</VirtualHost>


This should allow you to point all of your domains (www.ex1.com, www.ex2.com) to the same IP as your static server and have it re-route traffic to the dynamic ip servers based on name.

If you want to use just 1 domain name and re-route based on directory, you could do the same, you would just have multiple proxypass lines for the 1 server and list each directory. 

When an IP address changed, your php script would modify the proxy.conf file and send a reload command to apache.  kill -HUP `cat /var/run/apache.pid` or whatever.

It could work.  DynDNS is much easier.   :P

103
Find And Run Robot / FARR featured on DOWNLOAD.COM
« on: December 02, 2008, 03:11 PM »
farr.jpg
Find and Run Robot keeps your hands right where you want them, if you're a keyboard addict. This launcher seems to have been designed for people who want to keep their digits pounding the plastic, so every step of the program has been keyed for those with quick fingers.




farr.jpg

Edit:  Click that link.. .there's more.   :Thmbsup:


from Download.com/Windows

104
I have used this before and found it more than adequate.  :Thmbsup:

GSAR:  GSAR Project Page

gsar (General Search And Replace) is a utility for searching for and --- optionally --- replacing strings in both text and binary files. The search and replace strings can contain all kinds of characters (0--255), i.e. Ctrl characters and extended ASCII as well.

The algorithm used is a variation of the Boyer-Moore search algorithm, modified to search binary files. As a result of this, gsar is blindingly fast.

Opposed to line oriented search programs (like grep(1)), gsar will find all matches on a line. Actually, gsar doesn't know anything about lines at all, all files and strings are treated as binary.

Gsar can search one or several files for a string and report the occurrences. Gsar can read one file, search for a string, replace it with some other string, and create a new file containing the changes. Gsar can perform a search and replace in multiple files, overwriting the originals. Finally, gsar can work as a filter, reading from standard input and writing to standard output.

105
General Software Discussion / Is XP really that good?
« on: November 28, 2008, 12:51 AM »
Some good folks around DC may recall that I have opinions...  :tellme:

I am a huge fan on Linux, Unix and most things other than M$ OSes.  That being said, I have been running Win XP for several years.  I have a fairly tweaked system that I don't screw with much and I have been stable for a long time.  I recently upgrade to 4 GB RAM because 1) I could and 2) I thought it might improve my performance.  I have been running 2 GB for most of my XP career.

I'm currently running all of my normal stuff plus Google Chrome and have used only 1 GB RAM.  I'm using Process Explorer and I have been sitting at 1GB.  I've got  8 freaking tabs open plus I'm watching a movie* with VLC on top of all the other RAM sucking things I run normally.  WTF?  Is XP really that good at RAM management?

I'm spoiled enough to have a whole P4 system dedicated to PCLinuxOS.  It's cools and snappy; i'm not sure it's worth switching from XP.  Have we finally reached the point where local resources are a 2nd priority?  My Dell D600 laptop sucks (explainative) with 1024 RAM, why is my desktop so much more usable with the same free RAM?

I always want to believe Linux is better with RAM than XP; but I'm having a hard time making a case for desktop use.   What am I missing?

*Hancock MKV

Pages: prev1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 124next
Go to full version