226
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« on: January 05, 2012, 02:19 PM »"The Book Of SecretsThanks.-f0dder (January 05, 2012, 09:57 AM)
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
"The Book Of SecretsThanks.-f0dder (January 05, 2012, 09:57 AM)
Jouni Vuorio (author&owner of Macecraft JV16) is Finnish, and likes to support good ideas:
...
Regarding the Finnish edistyspuolue; well, yes, it is registered as a political party, but...
The party's name is old but was abandoned by the original party who took a new name. There were 31 people at the "new" edistyspuolue's last meeting which also was their first meeting, 23 Oct 2011, when they started the new party. Their acclaimed goal is to secure freedom for each person. However, their written agenda still is this simple; they don't yet have a political program.-Curt (December 15, 2011, 09:07 AM)
confirmed-tomos (November 25, 2011, 07:04 AM)
It would be interesting to see if using PhotoRec and a identifier for the DVB transport stream could recover it.
Plus it's something that can be tried without laying money on the line.
I might give it a go with the same 6.5GB ISO and see what happens.
Well, it's only been running for 18 minutes, (with currently over an hour to go), but PhotoRec has managed to recover ~26GB of files including two DVB-T MPG format files of 6.32GB and 10.2GB. Both files seem to be complete and are playable - pretty impressive so far considering those two files must have been deleted at least a week ago.
ADDENDUM: After 2.5 hours it's recovered 6481 files, (txt, jpg, mpg, avi, javascript, png, gif, mp3, ogg and more), over 40GB of data.
It didn't pick out the test file I put on there, (DVD video ISO), possibly because the file identifiers it uses couldn't precisely match a specific signature - unlike the two big MPGs, which were actually DVB-T transport streams, (.ts). I probably could have specified a custom signature but frankly, if it can recover the two large files, (which was the primary query: large file recovery), I mentioned above at over a week or so since deletion and having had data written to the drive in the meantime......
I give it: 2 tums up
-4wd (November 23, 2011, 04:17 AM)
Using more than one defragger is usually counter productive (certainly in terms of speed) as they have their own strategies for file placement and so running competing progams just undo each other.-Carol Haynes (October 22, 2011, 10:28 AM)
If it is not a question why would anyone rely on a defragment tool that appears to have bugs in the released version?
I used to use the free version but it didn't seem to be nearly as good as PerfectDisk (at least not the way I had it setup) and the interface I found really confusing. Probably very flexible but at the end of the day most people want a defrag tool that is set it and forget it.
Over the years I have tried most defrag tools but I keep coming back to PerfectDisk (although I have stuck with version 11 which I prefer over version 12).-Carol Haynes (October 22, 2011, 05:06 AM)
-eh... are you telling that I don't have to remove the newer build before installing the older?-Curt (October 20, 2011, 05:11 PM)
I've never understood why people go crazy with disk partitions. Some people seem to use them like one would use folders. There's no good reason I can think of to have a "movies" partition, a "music" partition, etc. 2 partitions, as 40hz said, boot and data, or at most 3, with boot, data, recovery/images. Of course keeping recovery/images on the same physical drive limits its applicability in the case of disaster. *Some* system problems can be recoverable that way (i.e. something that doesn't involve physical issues with the whole drive), but it's really better to keep sys images and recovery partitions on a separate drive IMO.
- Oshyan-JavaJones (October 20, 2011, 01:34 PM)
I have not seen any errors from build 39.-Curt (October 20, 2011, 09:31 AM)