topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 19, 2024, 8:42 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tuxman [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 98next
326
Keepass2Android (Smartphone), Kee (Firefox), KeePass (Windows).

327
DC Website Help and Extras / Re: Is DC attacked again?
« on: February 07, 2019, 02:20 PM »
You suck.

328
Don't you have a WordPress?  :-[

329
Here's the source code.  :)

330
Did you know that (some) mobile browsers support a new(ish) API to integrate your mobile operating system's sharing functions via JavaScript?

Well, here you go.

Screenshot_20190128-225056__01.jpg

Admin page:

fxWgN3K.png

Tested on Chrome on Android, Firefox won't work just yet. Enjoy or whatever.
Probably won't be hosted on WordPress.org (they require the shitty GPL license). Probably will be a NANY 2020 project.

The plug-in website may or may not stop being 404 some time.  :-[

Instructions:
1. Unzip the zip file into wp-content/plugins/.
2. Activate the plugin.
3. Donate 1 Million USD to me because I need it.

Good luck, have fun, whatever.

331
Version 2.0.0 is in the review queue, tracking this week's FOAAS updates.
Meanwhile, the add-on was moved to Mozilla's new Thunderbird add-on domain...

https://addons.thund.../qfo-quick-fuck-off/

332
I added a clarification above.  :D

was completely at odds with every other rename program I've used  ;D

I had not tested most of them, I guess. Sorry for breaking your habits?

333
OK, so if I've got this right, maybe, the full path is split into two parts only to be acted upon:

  • \test\test2\One\two\three\ozorroee\
  • ofile.text

?

Starting with the current version, more or less.

With -dr, the whole path is seen as one string (with or without the file's extension  ;)), regex_replace() is applied to it.
Without -dr, only the second part (= the file name, with or without the file's extension  ;)) will be processed. In fact, the regex_search() function will not even see the parent path anymore.

Code: C++ [Select]
  1. if (bRenameDirectories) {
  2.     // If the user has decided to not rename directories, why would we
  3.     // want to rename paths on the way?
  4.     out_path_stream << parent_path_stream.str();
  5. }

(Stop modifying your postings while I reply to them.  :mad: :-[)

334
Yup, "processed" is a new output in 1.3.0, it means that the rename_file() function had created the target directory already.  :)
(Because if I would just count that as "exists", it'd fail.)

Ha!

335
You and your cheeky test cases.
The expected outcome should be a simulation (-n).  :P

Your flags suggest that

\test\test2\One\two\three\ozorroee\ofile.text

should be renamed to

\test\test2\One\twd\three\ozorroee\ofile.txtxt

Or something.  :huh:

Surprise me: Which one have I forgot to log this time?

336
I fixed the somewhat anti-logical behavior of the -d flag with version 1.3.0. It should match the README now less badly.

337
I fixed the -E flag with version 1.2.2. That was a really dumb error.

338
The full path is handled as a string (and split between path and filename and, optionally, extension during processing). I admit that some features can be confusing even to me.  ;D

So here's how it is intended to work:

  • remv "a" "b":
    The current directory is processed, all sub-directories are ignored. Folders won't be touched at all.
  • remv -r "a" "b":
    The current directory and all of its sub-directories are processed. If a path matches, it will be renamed.
    - a.txt will be renamed to b.txt
    - a\some.txt will be renamed to b\some.txt fixed with 1.3.0
    - However, a\ alone won't be renamed to b\ if no files match.
  • remv -dr "a" "b":
    The current directory and all of its sub-directories are processed. If a path matches, it will be renamed.
    - a.txt will be renamed to b.txt
    - a\some.txt will be renamed to b\some.txt
    - a\ alone will also be renamed to b\ if no files match.

 :-[

339
Yes, it does - so you can match subfolders.  :)

I don't know if you noticed but it was suggesting directory name changes even though I hadn't specified the -d parameter.

If they are a part of the path to a regular file, yes. You cannot rename a whole directory without a file in it though.
I could make the non-d call skip subfolders, but then -d would be the same thing as not using -r, or am I mistaken?

340
Years after everyone who needed that had already joined the superior Bitbucket.  :)

341
Nice. I haven't really done much with the PowerShell yet.  :Thmbsup:

342
Hmm, that might be fixed with a simple call to create_directories before renaming, so the target directories will be created even if the original directories didn't match your regex. But that would lead to empty folders when the files from them have been moved.

I'm currently experimenting a bit:

> .\a.exe -Erv "remv" "romv"
 Renaming       '.\remv.hpp' to '.\romv.hpp' ...
   error [rn]: operation not permitted
 Renaming       '.\remv.cpp' to '.\romv.cpp' ...
   error [rn]: operation not permitted
 [STATS] Renamed 0 files (2 failed, 4 skipped).

> .\a.exe -rv "remv" "romv"
 Renaming       '.\remv.hpp' to '.\romv.hpp' ...
 Renaming       '.\remv.cpp' to '.\romv.cpp' ...
 [STATS] Renamed 2 files (0 failed, 4 skipped).

Something about the -E flag is fishy.  :huh:
I'll look into it tomorrow or on Monday (I'm visiting friends over the weekend). Attaching version 1.2.1 with a broken -E flag above for the time being.

343
"-vv" shows more stats indeed. This is intended. :)
OK, the newline is ugly, granted...

344
Version 1.2.0 should recurse backwards.  :-[

345
N.A.N.Y. 2019 / Re: N.A.N.Y. 2019: The Decision Sieve
« on: January 09, 2019, 02:42 PM »
It works fine here. :(

346
Why do I even publish software one year in advance if people don't test it before it's too late?  ;D

Not renaming the .exe would require to write one function per platform, as C++ does not have a cross-platform way to find the "current .exe path" as far as I know.  :huh:
Coming closer with version 1.2.0... (attaching above.)

347
Never heard of that! Too late now - damn.

348
N.A.N.Y. 2019 / Re: N.A.N.Y. 2019: The Decision Sieve
« on: January 09, 2019, 10:48 AM »
 :huh:

I hate everything.
Will look at it... after having updated remv which will happen, uhm, maybe today.

349
N.A.N.Y. 2019 / Re: N.A.N.Y. 2019 Begins
« on: January 08, 2019, 09:55 AM »
It can be one as well.

350
Now, now.

> .\a -Evv "hpp" "npp"
 Processing '.\a.exe'.
 Processing '.\constants.hpp'.
 Processing '.\filestats.hpp'.
 Processing '.\help.hpp'.
 Processing '.\remv.cpp'.
 Processing '.\remv.hpp'.
 [STATS] Renamed 0 files (0 failed, 6 skipped).

> .\a -vv "hpp" "npp"
 Processing '.\a.exe'.
 Processing '.\constants.hpp'.
 Renaming     '.\constants.hpp' to '.\.\constants.npp' ... Successfully renamed .\constants.hpp to .\.\constants.npp.
 Processing '.\filestats.hpp'.
 Renaming     '.\filestats.hpp' to '.\.\filestats.npp' ... Successfully renamed .\filestats.hpp to .\.\filestats.npp.
 Processing '.\help.hpp'.
 Renaming     '.\help.hpp' to '.\.\help.npp' ... Successfully renamed .\help.hpp to .\.\help.npp.
 Processing '.\remv.cpp'.
 Processing '.\remv.hpp'.
 Renaming     '.\remv.hpp' to '.\.\remv.npp' ... Successfully renamed .\remv.hpp to .\.\remv.npp.
 [STATS] Renamed 4 files (0 failed, 2 skipped).

Granted, the ".\.\" part looks inconvenient, but good enough.  ;D
I'll look into it on Wednesday again. Checking in, updating the RAR and leaving you alone for today/tomorrow. :)

Pages: prev1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 98next