topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 25, 2024, 4:02 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tranglos [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 43next
701
Btw does Archivarius  support
-thunderbird and outlook express contacts?
-custom file formats like .py or other codes?

Check out the complete list of supported formats:
http://www.likasoft....earch/features.shtml

Contacts aren't mentioned specifically, but I'd be surprised if it didn't support those. It does support all popular maibox formats, and does list Outlook .pst files - without excepting any part of them. Each new release adds new formats, though at this point it covers all the popular ones, so the new additions sound pretty esoteric to me; usually formats I've never even heard of.

Custom formats, definitely - anything that's text, regardless of file extension.


702
The exception to the mantra.

That's a seriously cool way to describe DC!

703
...and to continue some more, it looks like Visual Build Pro can indeed do (some of) what I want. The supported tools page mentions the ability to replace text in files, and among the samples there is a mention of substitution dictionaries:

Dictionary: Demonstrates initializing a collection of values using the Dictionary object, storing in a temporary macro, and using in a later step.

10 hours and 50 minutes to decide... :)

704
Why not just decide on your the layouts you want and then copy the HTML to a text editor and simply paste it in to each new document.
-Carol Haynes (May 11, 2009, 07:54 PM)

Only because if that's what I end up doing, what good is the CMS, other than giving me the Search button out of the box? That process has no advantage over a static site typed up by hand in an html editor.

To be honest I have looked at a lot of CMS systems and haven't seen any that provide a way of applying standard layouts to each article other than by coding the layout yourself as I have suggested here.
-Carol Haynes (May 11, 2009, 07:54 PM)

TextPattern does that, and it's a fantastic feature. You design "forms", which are reusable blocks of code that you can then display anywhere (really anywhere) on the site. A form can be something relatively big, as a common page header, or something very small, such as a div with a download link. And wherever you include that form, it's going to look and work exactly the same. This is a great way of subdividing the functional elements of a site and maintaining consistency.

But as I said in my OP, it's practically the only real "feature" TextPattern has. Out of the box it's not even a functional blog (no archive links, for example, until you install a plugin.) The free themes are few and badly designed (IMO; no usability, no fluid css layouts), and I haven't found any good commercial vendor of TextPattern themes. Also, installing themes is a pain in TextPattern, because themes are css + forms, so you have to manually copy and paste a dozen or so of these forms to install a single theme. And since there is no way to switch between themes, even trying out a theme can take hours just to see what it looks like on your site.


705
General Software Discussion / Re: Drupal is f*cked
« on: May 12, 2009, 09:45 AM »
I have also noticed that on the drupal forums a huge number of posts asking for help or clarification go ignored.. I'm not sure what that tells you but it's not a great sign.

For what it's worth, Joomla forums are much like that, too. Plenty of good questions go unanswered, and then there are lots of beginner questions by people with 1-post count, answered by people with a 4-post count, who clearly don't really know the answer, either.


706
...to continue the above substitution idea - it can of course be much smarter than my simple description.

The version number could actually be picked from the compiled executable; substitution variables could carry formatting specifiers, something like %date{format="yyyy-mm-dd"}% (the syntax doesn't matter), they could support recurrency, etc. Template syntax could support simple formatting markup as well, which the builder would turn into html, bbcode, wiki markups or other types depending on project specs. That way you could use the same template both for a plain text readme file, and for a website page that describes the software.

Does anyone use anything like that? Does it even exist?

In general, what does everyone do when releasing a build? When you increment the version number, do you manually update it everywhere in the docs, readmes, help, PAD files and on the website? It's not just the version number of course, there are tons of little details that change, and in the end I always forget do update a couple of places. What do you do?

Just last night I was designing an xml format for a "documentation compiler" that could do what I listed above, but I'm sure this wheel must have been invented a dozen times already.





707
I just purchased Visual Build Pro v. 7 (1-computer license), sight unseen. I have wanted FinalBuilder for years, but can't afford it.

I've been eyeing this one too, but I figure it's overkill for a one-man hobby shop. FinalBuilder likewise, both are really shiny!

There is one particular functionality I'm looking for this type of app: being able to generate documentation by substituting values in templates. For example, there would be a dictionary which defines something like
Version=1.0.0.23

and then a readme file template that says
"Welcome to MyApp v. %Version%"

Do you think Visual Build Pro can do this sort of thing? From the description I cannot be sure if it's supported - the bolded fragments approach the possibility but aren't specific enough: 

It can compile help projects, deploy applications, and perform builds on an automated, scheduled, remote, or continuous basis. And when it comes to distributing your applications, Visual Build is perfectly capable of creating installers for your software, burning physical media, creating ZIP archive files, and writing files directly to a website, network path, or FTP server.


708

1) Install JCE Editor for your editor - it is much better than TinyMCE and you can use HTML (and advanced HTML). You can even embed objects and include PHP etc if you want to. You can download it from the extensions website.
2) Rename htaccess.txt to .htacess and then go to Global Configuration and all the SEO settings to YES and hey presto you get meaningful URLs complete with .html extensions!
3) You don't need to enter any internal links. In JCE Editor select your text and then click the link with the green star - you can then navigate via a section/category tree to the content you want to create the link (which is then automatically updated if you edit pages and change their IDs).
4) There are a number of ways to use Category and Section views on the website - when you create a menu entry choose artcile and experiment with options other than Article Layout.
-Carol Haynes (May 11, 2009, 07:54 PM)

1. I had tried JCE before I posted. Granted, the html view is better. There's something wrong with the build or the way it installs though, both on my XP test machine, and on my hosting provider's server. The administration interface is completely messed up, and the wysiwyg part of the editor is missing critical buttons - I can't even add a link. In other words, it looks nothing like the author's screenshots. Perhaps it's because there seems to be a version mismatch between its two components: plg_jce_152.zip and com_jce_155.zip. These are the only downloads listed for Joomla 1.5. I wrote to the author and hope to hear from him.

2 and 3. I have clean URLs enabled, but that's not what I mean. Having to manualy enter even clean urls like http://www.example.c...category/somearticle is still wrong, since (a) the links will go bad if you later change the article categorization; and (b) it's almost impossible to type such links from memory; (c) this is exactly the job for the computer. In Joomla each article has an alias, so I hoped the CMS would force those aliases to be unique and use them for linking, something like {link:my-alias}, but that doesn't seem possible. Joomla basically wants you to create menu items for every article, but they seem to have neglected the need to have easy inline links to content within the same site.

Picking a link from a dialog box is fun the first three times, but not when you're migrating content from a static site and will be creating / updating hundreds of links between articles.

4. I still hope to get somewhere with layouts, but the docs don't sound optimistic on this, and neither is the Joomla forum. See this, for example - you can only assign a template after you've created a page *and* a menu link for it.

709
Then I read this and remember Mouser's recent wail and I think maybe I'd better leave it alone
make sure you read the later pages of posts where i start to waiver and decide to use drupal again as a programming platform.

I admit I dropped out of that thread :) Will revisit.

I think the keyword is "programming" though. The time you spend coaxing Drupal to do what you need isn't wasted, as long as you get where you want. To me, any time spent tweaking the platform is nothing but waste, since I'd rather be working on more apps to publish.

Since Drupal is notoriously reviewed as hard to create themes for, and since all I ultimately want is to adapt a template I like to a platform I choose, going with Drupal seems counterproductive.


710
What is the lightest (respecting cpucycles and resources) and best desktop document search out there? I am also looking for one with command line switches.

Of the indexing engines, Archivarius seems fairly light in terms of cpu and memory usage. (Only 1.6 MB working set when idle and minimized according to Process Explorer; about 16 MB when running restored). It's also very fast to load and responsive. The help says anothing about command-line switches though.

A for "the best", I think Archivarius supports the greatest variety of file formats. I chose it because it indexes TheBat! and Forte Agent data. It's not the prettiest, but is perfectly functional to me, and the author seems open to suggestions.

711
except for the easy theming, I would recommend Drupal. Mind you, however, such a rich feature set comes at a price: complexity.

I've been looking at Drupal again since it's supposed to be strong on taxonomy. Then I read this and remember Mouser's recent wail and I think maybe I'd better leave it alone :)

712
You said in another thread you were about to give up on Joomla - can I ask why? I have started to use it and as far as I can tell from your list it supports most of the things you wanted above - and anything that isn't there as standard is almost certainly available via an extension.
-Carol Haynes (May 11, 2009, 07:05 PM)

Hi Carol, thanks for being so patient with me :)

In that other thread I listed some of the deal-breakers. The wysiwyg editor is horrid if you ever hope to maintain consistent layout of pages, and when you switch to html mode, it's unusable (try it), so much so the only viable option is cutting and pasting between the browser and a desktop html editor. Strike one.

Then the issue of linking. I didn't realize before it was going to be such a big deal, but use internal linking a lot in whatever I write. having to use links like this http://eee.example.c...;id=26&Itemid=40 is another dealbreaker; even clean URls aren't too good because you still have to look them up every time and they can go stale easily. Strike two.

Strike three is that the sections and categories just seem to be empty vessels. They have no structural meaning and no functionality. And there seems to be no way to predefine page layouts for specific sections and categories. Basically, every time you go to create an article, it's a blank page. I need to be able to associate - automatically or even manually - layouts to sections (or individual articles, at least) to keep the page layout consistent. (It's completely impossible to achieve with a wysiwyg editor).

I haven't given up completely on Joomla, because I've invested much time in it already, and because I really love the templates I mentioned. I can't believe that last third point is a no-go. But the first two definitely are. Installing Joomla is a breeze, configuring it likewise, but adding articles, structuring them, formatting and linking between them is a surprisingly fragile process. Then I saw that all editor add-ons for Joomla are wysiwyg (except one that hasn't been updated for 1.5), and that was where my knees went weak :)

713
When I started on this road over two years ago, Mouser told me I would go insane, but would I listen? Nah...

And now my wife needs a nice, clean business site too, so as the purpose of my pursuit doubled, so did the pace of my head-first launch into cuckoo-land.  Now, a sadder and a wiser idiot, at least I've begun to know what it is that I'm looking for. Here;s my WANTED notice, plastered to a telephone pole along the electronic highway (excuse the platitudes). The musts are what I cannot live without; the shoulds are highly desirable:

- MUST be Php/MySQL, because this is what my host supports best, and this is where I have some experience. Though given a compelling reason, I'd trade php for python. It's OK if it uses local files instead of a database, though this is quite rare (DokuWiki).

- MUST be clean, valid xhtml/css, also when using custom themes.

- MUST have an easy way to maintain static pages (it's OK if they are called something else or aren't distinguished from dynamic content, as in Joomla).

- MUST support tags (keywords) for articles. Ideally, out of the box (like WordPress) - or through a plugin. MUST be able to show tag catalogs (as clouds or otherwise) and tags MUST be links.

- MUST have a flexible categorization system. SHOULD support assigning multiple taxonomies to individual articles (e.g. more than 1 category/section/etc)

- MUST provide some method to predefine templates (layout, not css stylings) for articles. SHOULD be able to associate templates with taxonomies (e.g. assign a different predefined article layout with each category. TextPattern can do this; too bad it's about the only thing it does).

- MUST support clean ("nice") URLs.

- MUST have an easy way of linking to articles internal to the site. This could be in the form of wikified links, or some other human-readable form. Allowing only for full URLs such as  http://www.example.c...;id=26&Itemid=40 is unacceptable. Fully-formed clean URLs (http://www.example.c...foo/bar/this-article) are also unacceptable, because it's still tedious, error-prone, and the link will become stale if the article is later reassigned to a different category.

- MUST have a code (non-WYSIWYG) editor: using Textile, BBCode or similar approach, or just plain html. (Though some of those are quite evil too. Using six apostrophes to get bold as in MediaWiki is a bit on the absurd side, but I could live with it.)

- MUST allow raw html in articles. SHOULD allow raw php in articles.

- MUST allow inlining images. (TextPattern allows only 1 image per article - now try to make a page of screenshots).

- MUST generate RSS feeds for internal content.

- MUST have a reasonably good search engine built in.

- MUST have a systematized method of uploading files of all types and linking to them in articles. (WordPress does well here.) SHOULD be able to display download counts.

- MUST be translatable and able to switch languages on the fly; it it's not, I'll just rip it apart and make it.

- Creating themes (styles, templates) MUST be relatively painless. I don't expect to find a template better than this for my personal site, or one that my wife will prefer to this for her company. Joomla templates both, so I'll likely be buying those and adapting them for our sites. That will not be a pleasant process, but at least it SHOULD not be torture :)

- SHOULD have a basic versioning system that is at least able to retain old versions of articles. Diffing is not required.

- SHOULD be able to syntax highlight code (via a plugin or otherwise).

- SHOULD really have some smarts! When I add an inline image (and *especially* if there is a WYSIWYG editor with a UI dedicated to that purpose), then it SHOULD generate the width and height parameters for the img tag. Putting a big dialog box in my face with an Upload button *and* empty text fields to fill out the image dimensions is just lame. Every HTML editor since HomeSite 1.0 would do this automatically.

Hello cmsmatrix!

714
Does Joomla use FCK? I have seen people having to resort to css word-wrap in other CMSes (/me not a Joomla user) whenever I have used a CMS I have switched off and done plain text.

There is an FCK plugin, but out of the box Joomla uses TinyMCE. No matter, WYSIWYG is quite the dog. I've tried building a test site for just two small apps, with neat little pages like Features, Screenshots, Download, History, FAQ... After posting just two articles I knew I could never maintain a consistent layout of the pages using a WYSIWYG editor, arranging headers and paragraphs manually, nudging the lines... It was a prime instance of OMG LOL situation.

How did you know it was about the editor though? :) The editor is one of the problems. Another is that there is no usable plain text mode - the content is a single line of html code. If I'm going to cut and paste to an HTML editor, I can do a static site faster that way. Another thing is how there is no way to easily link to internal articles. You have to use http://www.example.c...;id=26&Itemid=40 in the editor. Even with clean URLs it's awful, because if you reassign an article to another category, the links will go stale; I was hoping for something more wikified, I don't know. Again, it's easier to do a static site and link to "my-article.html" than use URLs like that.

And there's more, but I'm in the midst of writing a more coherent post, so I'll put this one on hold.



715
great point -- we would all be better off if programs gave us some bullet points of what they don't do, or don't do well.

After I wrote that, it occurred to me that I've always done that with my apps, without quite verbalizing the principle. My KeyNote page still lists all its shortcomings rather prominently :)

Then again, it's the kind of defeatist personality that I have ;) In college I put out a few editions of a tiny one-person magazine of anarchist poetry and insane rantings. I was proud of the first issue and some people liked it. But for the second issue I couldn't muster enough insanity, I guess, it felt flat to me, soulless. Even the cover was uninspired. So I wrote about that on the cover. I wrote "Not as good as the previous edition", or something to that effect. That drove people round the bend! It was fun to watch. How are you going to promote something if the first thing you tell everyone is how bad that is? You can't exactly make headway like that, I know!

Well, it was only a rant.

716
They are usually images- they are given as blank images, and you are given the fonts to put what you want on them yourself.  I usually convert them to photoshop format, then create a new layer for the text and any effects.  Then I save the psd files for later use and flatten them for the actual web images.

Look at this template for an example: http://www.4template...emplates/20/VA0113BL
And my website: http://www.ankhana.net

I apologize for replying so late. That was very, very helpful, thanks so much, wraith! (Fantastic choice of template for your site, too - really beautiful and fitting.)

I'm about ready to give up on Joomla and it looks like I'll just go with a static site again, so I might revisit those templates.

717
Living Room / Tell me what your software DOESN'T do... (a rant)
« on: May 11, 2009, 05:50 PM »
So imagine you're checking out a new text editor. The screenshots are the epitome of elegance, the feature list is enthralling, and the configuration possibilities are nothing short of hypnotizing. You download it, install it, maybe play with it for hours - weeks! - and it looks just royally good - until one night at 3 a.m. or thereabout you realize it doesn't do word wrap.

I've just had an experience quite like this with Joomla - the best, the featurest, the supportedest, the extensiblest of CMS-es. Ouch.

In my own defense, since Joomla is a complex piece of software, I assumed what I thought was a missing feature was merely my own ignorance. I thought if I couldn't do something it was because I didn't know how to get there yet, not because it couldn't be done. Well.

Dear mister generic developer, please tell me what your software does not do. Upfront-like. Thank you.

end rant!


718
It's definitely worth a try though.
i don't know if it really is.. but it's at least worth thinking about.

I forgot to add (though it's almost obvious) that what we are describing is already possible, with some manual work. You can save a report to file, close an app (or start a new one), then create and save another report and compare the two reports with a file compare tool.

If anyone tries this, please remember to use the same exact key selections and sort order for both reports, otherwise the comparison will be too messed up to work with. (Just don't change any options between the two runs.)

i mean there may still actually be a way to investigate the memory used by windows system and find out directly which programs have registered which global hotkeys, though obviously not easily.

I wonder if anyone has access to a program called WinHex. It comes in several editions, quite expensive all. One of the top editions has a feature to make a dump of (all?) system memory. I don't know if that includes kernel memory and other regions of RAM reserved by the OS, or only application-side memory. With some luck though it might be possible to find out where the registered hotkeys are stored. OTOH, I'm not at all sure if I could then replicate such a memory dump in Delphi. It's quite a deep-hacking thing.

719
If one *wanted* to discover what applications the hotkeys belonged to.. you could have a special mode that starting closing/killing applications and watching which hotkey assignments were released, and keeping that on record.

I've been thinking about that, yes. I could include a "comparison" mode, where you would run the test twice and compare results. That will take a while though, since for such a feature to work well I need to drop the listview and use a more powerful control, a grid maybe, where I could filter lines and mark them with color (like file comparison apps do).

That would still not help with hotkeys defined by Windows (Win+E, Win+R, etc.) - though these are pretty much standard - or with hotkeys registered by apps that start with the system and aren't easy to shut down, such as various firewalls and a/v programs. It's definitely worth a try though.

720
- Added support for multimedia and browser keys that some keyboards have. Typically, these keys will be shown as inactive, even though they "work". That is because the operating system does not register these keys as hotkeys with itself. However, some applications (e.g. Winamp), can register these keys, and then you'll see them listed as active.

- The "Show only active keys" option has been replaced with a three-way toggle: Show all, Show only active keys, and Show only inactive keys. The F5 key now cycles through these three options.

...and more (see the History section in the Readme post)

Download links at the bottom here and in the top post.

721
Bug: If the "About" tab is open when you click "Test Active Hotkeys" you get an error. You need to force it to open the Active Hotkeys tab before attempting to test.
-Carol Haynes (May 07, 2009, 04:37 PM)

Fixed in the new release (1.1.0)

722
Can you put the .ini files in the ActiveHotkeys folder?

Done - please download the latest version (1.1.0). This is still a non-default setting, so you will need to use the /localconfig switch on the command line (you can add it to the Start menu shortcut used to launch AH).

723
You still need to download the main utility from the first post.

Good point. That will teach me to attach the latest version to the post in which it is announced :)

724
New version, hot off the compiler! What's-new highlights in 1.4 beta:

- count from a specified initial value DOWN to zero.

- start counting UP from a specified initial value.

- start counting (up or down, depending on current mode) from the last displayed value.

- presets for initial time values

- you can control eStopWatch and query its current state via Windows messages (see the example controleStopWatch.ahk script included with the program). The latest version of the AHK script is attached here. (AHK is not necessary; the script serves as a documentation for the message codes and return values).

...and a few other tricks. Enjoy, and please note it *is* a beta version.

725
Feature requests:
Countdown timer:  Could you also include a countdown timer mode on it?

Please download version 1.4 beta (released May 9). It counts down from an initial value. (There are also presets for initial values, which you can configure and reuse).

Pages: prev1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 43next