1
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup
« on: October 20, 2010, 04:58 AM »
Hello
I have been using DSynchronize for over 2 years and just discovered Bvckup.
What I like :
- reliability (DSynchonize does only monitor changes but assumes all is already synchronized, which is not always true, and sometimes stopped to work without apparent reason)
- small cpu usage when syncing
- separated interval setting for each backuped place
- readability of the GUI
What I dislike :
- DSynchronize was able to start as a service (without GUI) and didn't use more than 2 or 3 MB of memory (about 100Go of data to monitor in numerous places) while Bvckup uses about 90-100MB to monitor the same places.
Very good work; if you could reduce memory usage, it would be near perfect.
I have been using DSynchronize for over 2 years and just discovered Bvckup.
What I like :
- reliability (DSynchonize does only monitor changes but assumes all is already synchronized, which is not always true, and sometimes stopped to work without apparent reason)
- small cpu usage when syncing
- separated interval setting for each backuped place
- readability of the GUI
What I dislike :
- DSynchronize was able to start as a service (without GUI) and didn't use more than 2 or 3 MB of memory (about 100Go of data to monitor in numerous places) while Bvckup uses about 90-100MB to monitor the same places.
Very good work; if you could reduce memory usage, it would be near perfect.