avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday September 28, 2022, 5:18 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MenzAgitat [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1]
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup
« on: October 20, 2010, 04:58 AM »
I have been using DSynchronize for over 2 years and just discovered Bvckup.

What I like :
- reliability (DSynchonize does only monitor changes but assumes all is already synchronized, which is not always true, and sometimes stopped to work without apparent reason)
- small cpu usage when syncing
- separated interval setting for each backuped place
- readability of the GUI

What I dislike :
- DSynchronize was able to start as a service (without GUI) and didn't use more than 2 or 3 MB of memory (about 100Go of data to monitor in numerous places) while Bvckup uses about 90-100MB to monitor the same places.

Very good work; if you could reduce memory usage, it would be near perfect.

Simple but very useful.
Could you add right click support on listed files please ?

Pages: [1]