Messages - WhiteTigX [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33next
31
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2.4.3 build 471 Display Properties throws error
« on: January 28, 2018, 03:06 PM »
Half a year later, fixed in v2.4.4


33
T-Clock / Re: Calendar Week 52 instead of 1
« on: January 04, 2018, 07:38 AM »
Related issue: #128

34
By the way...
What is the static build?
the one with _static in its name... I plan on making this the default^^
Basically it's statically compiled/linked, which means that all dependencies are "integrated" and thus no need for any Redistributable Package. The downside is usually higher load times and memory usage.. but in my measurements, it actually used less memory^^ Maybe because it's also using GCC instead of MSVC

35
T-Clock / Re: T-clock reviews
« on: December 16, 2017, 05:19 AM »
[...]
There is a wish to the author, it would be good to make the time update as in the program Atomic Time Synchronizer 10 http://lmhsoft.com/timesync/ it would be simply wonderful.
Well... it's currently not the highest priority and actually some work... T-Clocks (S)NTP client should be rewritten and syncing time requires admin rights. So we'll need a service (basically breaks portability) which can be started by T-Clock to elevate itself, which is a security issue... So the service has to reside in "C:\Program Files\" and must check T-Clocks checksum / certificate among other things...

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33next
Go to full version