Messages - bit [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 114next
436
General Software Discussion / Re: How link to pix in Tumblr?
« on: March 16, 2014, 07:09 PM »
You're doing it wrong  :)

Firefox (Pale Moon/Waterfox):

Menu->Web Developer->Inspector:
 (see attachment in previous post)
Click picture:
 (see attachment in previous post)
Okay so far that doesn't seem to bring up a link for me in Firefox.
Do you think I should install Pale Moon or Waterfox and try again?
Maybe I should try that.

437
General Software Discussion / Re: How link to pix in Tumblr?
« on: March 15, 2014, 07:10 PM »
hm... I didn't even know there could be limitations on Tumblr!

Firefox (Pale Moon):

(see attachment in previous post)

Or do you meet the limitations in some other contexts?
Please enlighten me, I know nothing about Tumblr.
Yes, I think the context would be that I'm not a member of Tumblr.
Maybe copying is possible if one is a member, but not sure.

But the above program went at it like there was no tomorrow, downloading every pic on the page in minutes.
It did not however give me the ability to just right-click any pic and get a link to refer back to in posts elsewhere, and I tried IE, Chrome, Firefox, and Seamonkey; all failed to do that with or without the Tumblr ripper.

So I wonder do you have to be a member of Tumblr to be able to do it?

438
General Software Discussion / How link to pix in Tumblr?
« on: March 14, 2014, 11:46 PM »
All my browsers are unable to give me the ability to right-click on a picture in a Tumblr blog and grab a link to that one picture.
Other web sites can do this, or allow me to 'view image' in a new tab or same tab, but not on Tumblr.
Or can anyone tell me if there is a Donation Coder coding snack or other program that can do this, and what is a safe software host to download it from?

edit: found a 'tumblr ripper' (image downloader). tnx!

439
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: multi-stage password
« on: March 08, 2014, 02:42 PM »
I suppose my idea may have been a bit over simplistic.
Perhaps the encryption is so bound up in the TrueCrypt or ScramDisk type software that it cannot be co-opted by a shell or front end program.
The idea was, what if you could start the shell, and use it to enter multiple up to 64-character passwords before opening a file?

That's not quite like having a container within a container, which limits you to sequential or serial 64-digit passwords.
I've read how someone set up a case with multiple video cards to crack longer passwords.
So I thought to myself, what if you had to enter two or three 64-digit passwords before anything unlocks?
And to do that, what if your shell program could just run two or three copies of TrueCrypt, and sort of dialogue with them all at once?
So that, in what I'm thinking, you would need two or three 64-digit passwords set up in advance before anything is opened at all.
But perhaps I'm not perceiving the true nature of the encryption software in the first place, and maybe it just doesn't work that way.

440
Post New Requests Here / IDEA: multi-stage password
« on: March 07, 2014, 02:54 PM »
Normally, you engage an encryption program like TrueCrypt or ScramDisk, and you type in 'one' password or passphrase.
This proposes what might be termed a 'shell program' or 'front end', that sets up either one of two things;
1) that two or more copies of TrueCrypt, ScramDisk, or whatever, open side by side in 'parallel',
2) that two or more copies of TrueCrypt, ScramDisk, or whatever, open one after another in 'series'.

Thus, you start 'shell', and it automatically opens one copy of TrueCrypt, and you type in a passphrase.
TrueCrypt, operating in 'shell mode', receives the first password, unlocks, and reports back to 'shell'.
'Shell' thereupon opens number 2 copy of TrueCrypt, and you enter a second password.
TrueCrypt #2 unlocks, and reports back to 'shell'.
'Shell' confirms sequential entry of passwords, and unlocks.

The above is a clumsily worded description.
The idea is, you combine multiple instances of TrueCrypt, ScramDisk, or whatever, into a Multi-encryption shell-unit, unifying them into something that basically requires multiple passwords to unlock.

Thus, complexity is compounded, but unlocking is simplified by x-units of passwords entered either in parallel or series mode.


Pages: prev1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 114next
Go to full version