Messages - fenixproductions [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 233next
191
Living Room / Re: Anyone playing Mass Effect 2 game yet?
« on: March 14, 2012, 06:09 PM »
@Deozaan
SPOILER (warning for mouser)
As far as I heard so far it should be possible to have the best ending with single player only. All you need is to do everything (all quests and artifacts): I did that for all 3 games!
And now I should play multi - being thrown away so much? Isn't even more ridiculous


192
Living Room / Re: Anyone playing Mass Effect 2 game yet?
« on: March 14, 2012, 04:29 PM »
@wraith808
SPOILERS!!!
I've read all of them after play. And I understand that autors have the right to plot the story however thay want to but…

Matrix has shitty ending but it is still fun to watch it over and over again.

With ME I've lost that. Houndreds of hours spent (I've replayed whole story not so long ago) for nothing. This is the feeling I have: all choices, getting to know game's universe (books/comics) and getting fully motional emotional just to be slapped in face. There is no sense in ending and it is iconsistent with the rest of content (i.e. exploding Relays would destroy more lifes that Reaper ever did).

I own a lot of games - many of them are poor - but this may be the first time I truly regret of playing.

BTW Two previous parts had pots full of gold and the third… the larch.


@mouser
I don't think you deserve such bad ending ;)

Either way: it is bound to EA account (despite the fact of having DVD edition).

193
Living Room / Re: Anyone playing Mass Effect 2 game yet?
« on: March 14, 2012, 03:18 PM »
I've just finished ME3 and…
Spoiler
I feel like someone split in my face  >:(


194
@K.Murat
I understand why these thumbnails are needed but what I truly doubt is:
2. You can select to backup your catalog with or without thumbnails. Because thumbnails are something that could be regenerated later, from actual files;

Is it really always necessary? Couldn't Daminion check if this is needed on assumption of file size?

My exact case was:
I have 2881 SVG files which are mainly icons. Since there is no image organizer for vector files, I had decided to make mirrored directory with PNG versions of them. Simple batch script for rsvg-convert.exe did the work and I have few thousands thumbnails - 512 pixels wide. From my point of view it is now not worth it to have Daminion to offer thumbnails of my thumbnails. I don't know the code behind this software but for me: time saved on regenerating thumb for little bigger picture is lost on searching its entry in SQlite database + reading it from hidden dir. Please correct me on this :)

For bigger images it is OK but not for such case. It would be better to have an Option for setting minimum image size needed for thumbnails.

BTW AFAIR some JPG files may contain embedded thumbnails already (in EXIF?). Does Daminion recreate thumb from bigger image to its own dir or use embedded one? How does it look like performance wise?

195
I had tried Daminion few days ago and didn't like three things:
  • No configuration at all.
  • For my 200MB cliparts folder it created 90MB hidden directory full of thumbnails.
  • No warning before any changes or edits buffering. I had wanted to test it on my photos folder and I am lucky I did not. It would mess up my existing tags completely.

Pages: prev1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 233next
Go to full version