6
Living Room / Re: Star Trek 2009 - Discussion [SPOILERS]
« on: June 01, 2009, 04:38 PM »
I would rate the movie a B+ overall, but a C- for cinematography and a C for "Trekiness".
I am getting very sick of the constant movement ("shaky cam") and rapid angle/scene changes Hollywood is now using to "spice up" the action. It doesn't make it more exciting at all, it just makes it almost impossible to follow the action unless you can watch the scene 3 to 4 times! >:( Also, I would have liked them to have zoomed out a bit more. Almost the entire movie takes place from a close up perspective.
and...
I would say it is flawed but good.
I am getting very sick of the constant movement ("shaky cam") and rapid angle/scene changes Hollywood is now using to "spice up" the action. It doesn't make it more exciting at all, it just makes it almost impossible to follow the action unless you can watch the scene 3 to 4 times! >:( Also, I would have liked them to have zoomed out a bit more. Almost the entire movie takes place from a close up perspective.
and...
Spoiler
- HOW THE HELL CAN THEY JUST TOSS 40 YEARS OF TREK TO THE WIND! GOD DAMMIT! :Ahem: I'm better now.
- Ugh, time travel, especially when it creates paradoxes is very hard to write. The "big reveal" of how Nero and Spock came to the time the movie takes place was just lame. Supernova, Red Matter, WTF!?!
I would say it is flawed but good.