Messages - movrshakr [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15next
6
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« on: June 09, 2015, 01:30 PM »
You need to install the MS Visual C++ 2010 redistributable package for the bitness (x86/x64) you're running.

Ahso.  Off to look.

7
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« on: June 08, 2015, 04:59 PM »
Having a bit of  PROBLEM...
i DID  full recovery on wife's HP LAPTOP - A 2011 W7  machine.
ReinstaLLING EVERYTHING..
(dang you cannot help but hiht caps lock on this kbd)
Now when I run clock.exe or clock64.exe, I get an error message that MSVCR100.dll is missing.
Need the clock!  :)

Whassup?

8
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« on: May 01, 2015, 11:29 AM »
Understand.

It confused me since it was you talking about the new version and the first post says
"Download is still only available here."

9
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« on: May 01, 2015, 08:06 AM »
Latest build v2.3.2 seems to be running just fine on Windows 10 x86 b10074
-Stoic Joker (May 01, 2015, 07:18 AM)

Stoic, I have lost track.  Is WhiteTigX or you or both doing the current work on this?
In post 1, I get a 404 for the link in the original post (actually Reply "0"; Reply 1 is the second post))
"www.StoicJoker.com/TClock for general info. Download is still only available here."

I must be dense.  In that post, there are so many "this is here and that is there" that I can never figure out where to get it.  The above indicates I failed again. :)

10
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« on: January 30, 2015, 10:43 AM »
I understand what you are saying; I have never had any problem with REVO damaging anything when set to 'moderate' level of detection.  It may leave stuff unremoved of course, and certainly did this time since Norton subverted the process by injecting the re-start, which ended Revo's operations.

I did just now download and run the Norton remover. It ran, but gives no report of details on what it did (it does say 'doing xyz' while running, but not results) --maybe removed nothing since I had already done the standard removal, and that could have confused it--but it did not report being confused.

We have no way of knowing what programs have their own removers except by doing a web search every time we get ready to uninstall something. Lots of added work.  One has to wonder why Norton did not make that remover tool be its uninstaller that runs when commanded through Programs and Features.  It could pop up a selection list to pick which thing to uninstall, or they could break it into pieces for each separate product.  The truth is, they WANT to leave stuff behind to do things like beg you to reinstall, or collect data (maybe) or whatever.  They don't want a clean, total uninstall to be done.

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15next
Go to full version