Messages

1751

Living Room / Re: Me & my crazy optical mouse

« on: February 04, 2008, 06:29 PM »

but however i miss my drag-click function. how do i enable it?

-lanux128 (February 04, 2008, 12:46 AM)

Lanux

the following duplicates the click and drag functionality, albeit awkwardly

[Select]

#persistent
lbutton::
sleep, 100
click
return

+lbutton::click,left,down
^lbutton::click, left,up

added 2 hotkeys - SHIFT+LBUTTON sends the left mouse button down command.  Dragging the mouse will highlight...whatever.  CONTROL+LBUTTON sends the left mouse button up command

Like I said, there are probably more elegant ways to do this (I'm no expert, for sure), but this might get you through...

Target

1752

General Software Discussion / Re: windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: February 04, 2008, 06:21 PM »

hmmm, so the upshot here is... nothing!!

it appears you can use what you like, or not, based pretty much on your comfort level personal (software) preferences...

Target

1753

General Software Discussion / Re: windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: February 03, 2008, 06:18 PM »

another thought (insert collective groan here...)

what about proxies (ie Proxomitrom, proximodo, privoxy, etc)??

I haven't seen any reference to them anywhere here so far.  Are they a useful security app, or just a handy filtering tool??

Target

1754

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: February 03, 2008, 06:07 PM »

thanks for the, err...'passionate' responses regarding the NForce firewalls, they echo what I'd been seeing in a lot of places...

FWIW I gave PC Tools a whirl and have to say I was mightily disappointed. 

first problem (for me) - it blocked the internal network for some reason (and I'm not even on a network!!!), wouldn't let me play CounterStrike (single player).  Tried tweaking the rules to no avail (probably my lack of expertise didn't help here...)

second problem - inability to connect to the net.  It may be a good firewall, but I never found out 'cos it either blocked my connection, or dropped it after a very short time.  I spent well over an hour trying to establish a reliable connection, and in the end simply disabled the firewall (problem solved!!).  Maybe I'm a slow learner, but I can't for the life of understand why an app that is apparently as well considered as this one appears to be shouldn't work straight out of the box...

On top of that it was so intrusive (I'm still installing stuff after a rebuild) - every install required a response (some several).

Now I know this is a 'good thing', but it's irritating in the extreme.  Clicking on the 'remember this' option shortcuts some of this, but creates a useless rule.  Uninstalling was an equally frustrating exercise (why would I want to create a rule to uninstall something???).

all in all a very unproductive session (well, apart from the fact that now I know not to use PC Tools firewall)

Target

1755

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: February 01, 2008, 12:18 AM »

I've just been browsing over at wilders and been reminded about the the NVidia NForce firewall that came with my motherboard

I used this for a while but switched (for no good reason that I can remember), now i'm wondering if it might be worth going back to...

anyone else got any feedback or experience of this app?

Target 

update - hmmm, after a little googling it doesn't seem like this is a particularly good option (though personally I don't recall it ever being a problem)

1756

Living Room / Re: Me & my crazy optical mouse

« on: January 31, 2008, 05:18 PM »

Lanux

shouldn't be any problem installing the MS drivers - if they don't work you could also try alternatives from the other (major) manufacturers (Logitec, etc??)

re the AHK scripting, it's difficult to say cos i can't replicate your problem (happily  ) but you could try the following -

Code: AutoIt [Select]

1. #persistent
2. ;this is a basic hotkey - all it does is take a single left button click and transmit a single left mouse button click
3. ;I can't say whether or not it might fire twice in your case so you'll need to test it
4. lbutton::click

if it does fire twice you're not achieving anything cos AHK is only duplicating the behaviour you're already experiencing.  The only thing I can think of here would be to put in a small delay before sending the click action

Code: AutoIt [Select]

1. #persistent
2.  
3. lbutton::
4. sleep, 100
5. click
6. return

you'll need to play with this a bit to see if it's going to do what you need.  You'll also need something that performs the doubleclick function when you do need it (it would be the same code, but with a modifier on the hotkey, eg ^LButton (CONTROL+LBUTTON))

if this doesn't work, I'm not altogether sure where to go (try the forums??)

let us know what happens

Target

1757

Living Room / Re: Me & my crazy optical mouse

« on: January 31, 2008, 12:11 AM »

hmmm, now you're putting me on the spot...

i was thinking about a hotkey, but now I'll have to go and do some research...

Target

1758

Living Room / Re: Me & my crazy optical mouse

« on: January 30, 2008, 11:25 PM »

Lanux

another possibility occurs to me -have you investigated the possibility of using AHK to 'reassign' your mouse keys?

I'm no expert, but I think you could use it to intercept the mouse clicks and perform an action, eg setup a hotkey to intercept those pesky double clicks and transmit them as a single click (you would also need to setup an alternative for intentional double clicks)

Target

1759

General Software Discussion / Re: windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: January 30, 2008, 09:51 PM »

BTW, something that I'll install soon: DropMyRights. Now this thing is useful, and it does consume zero resources.

-Lashiec (January 30, 2008, 07:09 PM)

Why stop there?  

I usually set my privileges to user (OK, <i>power</i>-user...) - this should stop (some?) nasties from installing/running, and
I can log in as the administrator if I need to...

Target

1760

General Software Discussion / Re: windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: January 30, 2008, 07:13 PM »

not suggesting we ignore the threat, just wondering how much we really need to do to guard against it

the original query related to what do we <i>really</i> need in the way of security, ie is it sufficient (for those with hardware firewall) to use an AV tool, or do we need a firewall, and an AV, and an ad blocker, and a spyware removal tool, and a trojan hunter, and and and

and at what point does the law of diminishing returns kick in?

there's no doubt that we need to use something, but what? (like you, I've read most of the other threads but couldn't draw any firm conclusions from them...)

it seems that we can all get cought up in the hype about which product we like better (for whatever reason), but I have to wonder whether the danger is as significant as we might have been led to believe

there's no silver bullet here, I was just wondering what others thought was <i>really</i> necessary .

Target

1761

Living Room / Re: Me & my crazy optical mouse

« on: January 30, 2008, 12:48 AM »

did it come with any software??

if so, try uninstalling/reinstalling

if that doesn't work, many of the drivers are interoperable, so try some alternatives (the intellimouse software used to be freely available - but there are no doubt others...)

Target

1762

General Software Discussion / Re: windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: January 30, 2008, 12:11 AM »

there's no getting around the user, but it's probably safe () to assume that most here are reasonably savvy about the dangers

I have heard several opinions expressed regarding the relative value of outbound firewalling, but can't help but consider it essential

I'm on dialup so a router isn't an option, and like Nosh, I hoard my bandwidth and really <i>really</i> don't like the idea of anything calling out (regardless of it's intent) without my knowledge. 

Basically I see it as just another tool, a means of identifying a potential infection/compromise, and given that most infections these days are likely to come from inside your firewall (see StoicJokers input above regarding PEBKAC* problems) it would seem prudent to implement this feature.

it's also hard to take a recommendation from <i>any</i> of the discussions I've seen so far.  For every person who has a good experience of firewall X, there is at least one with bad...

Not much said about the other options (AV, antispy/malware) so far - as Lashiec said, there are heaps of choices out there, but what to choose??

Do we <i>really</i> need spyware detection?  Do we <i>really</i> need ad blocking? Do we <i>really</i> need a trojan hunter? Do we <i>really</i> need <insert you're choice here>?

and if we do, how do we measure it's effectiveness/value?

Personally I've used both Spybot and AdAware (and probably others) at various times and found little benefit from either - maybe I've been lucky, who knows, but the upkeep certainly wasn't worth the returns.

Another thought occurs to me - just what is the real danger here? 

others have referred to this obliquely, but are we so caught up in the general hype surrounding the latest crop of super wonder mega fireproof antimalware pro apps that we've lost sight of what it is we're actually trying to guard against?  Is the threat <i>really</i> as serious as industry and the media would have us believe?

I've seen references that these days virii don't seem to be destructive (ie they don't trash you're data/hardware).  If this is the case, and I suspect it is, then what are they doing, sending spam emails?  if this is the worst of it then it doesn't seem like a serious issue (apart from the potential liability issues ).  What about fraud/identity theft?  is this a common problem that could be minimised using the available tools?  (this isn't a problem for me - I have a simple rule about this stuff, if I don't want anyone to know, or I can't afford to lose it, I don't keep it on my PC.  I know this isn't practical/possible for everyone, but the sentiment stands)     

Target

* PEBKAC - <b>P</b>roblem <b>E</b>xists <b>B</b>etween <b>K</b>eyboard <b>A</b>nd <b>C</b>hair

1763

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: January 29, 2008, 01:07 AM »

there are several threads already about firewall & security. here are a few..

• Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products
• How necessary is a software firewall?
• Free Windows firewalls found better than commercial ones
• Firewalls - please, i can't be bothered.
• The Great Firewall Hunt ... frustrating ...

i think you get the idea..

-lanux128 (January 28, 2008, 10:09 PM)

granted (I should have realised that this is one of those eternal chestnuts...), but after grinding through all of the quoted threads I'm none the wiser - seems someone had an issue with every one of the firewalls quoted and there didn't seem to be any consensus on whats acceptable

On top of that, there are other components to the security issue, and I guess the same caveats apply.  AVG and Avast! appear to be the defacto free offerings, athough I note many here use $ware offerings, and some use nothing but their own vigilance...

still others pile yet more applciations on top of their respective AV apps (add aware, spybot, etc, etc).  I see no problem with this, but wonder at the value of it all (I can see f0dder nodding here...), how much is enough, or not enough, as the case may be...

what i was proposing was tackling this from another angle - instead of looking at that shiny new super wonder firewall (master pro edition), lets look at whats really needed when choosing a security solution, be that a firewall (it should be stable, lite on resources, reasonably simple/intuitive, provide both inbound and outbound blocking, export/import of rulesets, etc, etc), or AV/antimalware tools

think of it as an exercise in building an 'ideal' solution if you like

Target

1764

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: January 28, 2008, 09:00 PM »

Is it me or are lots of people really paranoid? It strikes me that some of the multiple solutions hinted at above would leave systems running at such a snail pace that it might be simpler to simply unplug from the internet and still have a faster surfing experience! 

-Carol Haynes (January 28, 2008, 08:01 PM)

time for a spin-off thread??

https://www.donation...47.msg98999#msg98999

Target

1765

General Software Discussion / windows security - what's really necessary?

« on: January 28, 2008, 08:56 PM »

there is an ongoing thread at https://www.donation...dex.php?topic=6059.0 about the best free windows firewall

that thread got me thinking about what it is that is really necessary to make the virtual world a safe place to visit.

a lot of people have espoused various firewalls, while others have been given a big thumbs down - some even eschew any sort of software firewalling

on top of a firewall most use a range of AV and antimalware utilities. 

Some users install and maintain a sometimes bewildering array of these tools and swear by the results

I'm no expert, but I can't help but wonder whether this in an effective strategy - OK, let's assume it's 'effective', but at what cost?.  does the extra overhead justify the results

I guess the question I'm actually asking here is what is it we really need, ie

• firewalls - which features or functionality should we consider mandatory, which are nice to have, and which ones are useless fluff/bloat.
• AV - as above
• Anti-Malware - I've separated this as I consider things like ad-aware etc perform a different function to 'normal' AV applications

and just how can we, as end users, determine the effectiveness of any or all of these tools, individually or in concert, in meeting our particular needs?

Target

1766

Developer's Corner / Re: AHK Capability

« on: January 28, 2008, 06:39 PM »

HA! that's funny

I was just about to post a link to this thread in your thread about window spy tools...

Target

1767

General Software Discussion / Re: Spam filtering

« on: January 28, 2008, 06:17 PM »

I used to use K9, but switched to Magic Mail Monitor some time ago

it's small, it's free, and no install

works at the server level, ie it reads and deletes messages before you download (a musthave for those of us on dialup)

no self learning, but the user defined rules can use regex's

target 

1768

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: January 25, 2008, 12:36 AM »

These are my thoughts only, I have no insights into the mindset of the people that do these things, nor have I seen anything regarding this, but it seems like a logical step for a malware author to take.

Having said that, I guess it would depend on the level of difficulty involved in compromising a given piece of software, and the relative importance of doing so.

Ultimately there are likely to be many (many!) more systems that can be compromised without the extra effort than there are those that need it.  It's also unlikely that the net gain would be worth the effort (these guys <i>are</i> taking the path of least resistance after all)

Target

1769

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: January 24, 2008, 07:33 PM »

true enough, but doing something might help, whereas doing nothing....

target

1770

General Software Discussion / Re: Best free firewall for Windows?

« on: January 23, 2008, 09:55 PM »

having just had to rebuild my machine I'm following this thread with interest, but am starting to feel a little frustrated

I've been using Comodo (v2x) for sometime so I'm interested to see whether or not I need to continue to use something like this, or whether something not so 'cutting edge' will do the job (eg Kerio 2.15, sygate, agnitum, etc??)

We've had references to several app's, some of which are quite old (and/or no longer available??) and which the users seem quite happy with, and some of which are 'new' and which people aren't happy with.  

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be much in the way of objective info regarding the relative merits of any given app (4WD went some way towards this...).

also, while there seems to be a consensus that a properly configured router is the way to go, for the purpose of the OP they are pretty much off topic.  Granted they are the defacto standard, but they're not free, and they're not for everyone (eg they aren't an option for dial up users...)

it's also worth remembering that PCs are inherently insecure (firewalling aside), so there will never be a substitute for common sense and a bit of knowledge.

nice piece by Lashiec, BTW

Target

1771

Developer's Corner / Re: AHK Capability

« on: January 23, 2008, 07:13 PM »

• direct me to the command(s) to intercept the Windows save dialogs.
• direct me to the command(s) for sending a string to the filename text box in the Windows save box.
  

-CodeTRUCKER (January 23, 2008, 01:58 AM)

there are a couple of window spy tools that might be helpful with the above - you get one with AHK, but a more comprehensive tool is available here (courtesy of Toralf) http://www.autohotke...forum/topic8976.html

Target[/list]

1772

Developer's Corner / Re: AHK Capability

« on: January 22, 2008, 07:13 PM »

Some background on what you're trying to do might be helpful here (not quite sure why you want to intercept a dialog box, or what you want to do with it once you have...)

That sounds reasonable, but this application is designed to intercept the standard "Save"/"Save As" Windows dialog, but a dynamic menu option might do the trick once a window is available to put the menu on.  

-CodeTRUCKER (January 22, 2008, 06:50 PM)

Not knowing what your requirements were I was actually suggesting 'a menu', like a tray or context menu.  The structure can be built to as many levels as you need.  'Dynamic' menu's are possible, though it will obviously depend on your requirements...

Can AHK build/demolish paths dynamically based on user input?    I know a lot of this depends on the coder.  (FYI - I did add this question to my orig post.)

-CodeTRUCKER (January 22, 2008, 06:50 PM)

short answer would be yes.  The long answer will depend on your requirements

I'm not an authority by any means, so it might be a good idea to check the AHK forums (lots and lots of useful/helpful stuff/people there)

Target
 

1773

Developer's Corner / Re: AHK Capability

« on: January 22, 2008, 06:32 PM »

certainly do-able in AHK, though it seems to me it would be easier to setup and use as a menu rather than a series of gui's

Target

1774

General Software Discussion / Re: Going insane tring to find SW to fill these needs, I need help

« on: January 21, 2008, 11:12 PM »

possibly also see LastChance http://www.fileware....ducts.htm#LastChance

LastChance is a desktop utility that provides the facility to run programs when the machine is shutting down. Once the user chooses Shutdown from the Start menu, LastChance will intercept the shutdown request and optionally run the configured programs, waiting for them to finish before continuing the shutdown procedure.

Target

1775

Post New Requests Here / DONE: 'Used fonts' tool

« on: January 21, 2008, 05:08 PM »

Having just migrated several family members to 'new' PCs I thought Skrommels Used Fonts script was a great idea (my wife just can't understand why loading every font in the known universe isn't necessarily a good thing...)

Unfortunately it is rather limited in that it only does word files, and then only one at a time...

What would make this a truly useful tool would be if it could scan your system for a range of 'common' file types and return a list of used fonts

Anyone here got any ideas?? (I've been through the script and the system scan part shouldn't present to much of a problem, but I don't understand the API calls that are the meat of the thing.)

see also my (unanswered) post under Skrommels Software...
https://www.donation...ex.php?topic=11730.0

TIA

Target