76
Living Room / poor? Pay up!
« on: May 21, 2009, 12:50 PM »
Great article at the washintong post: Poor? Pay up!.
In fact, one cannot afford to be poor!
In fact, one cannot afford to be poor!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
As some commentators have suggested, there may be a bunch of IT departments that adopt Windows 7, but if they do it will be out of annoyance and necessity (if Microsoft finally phases out Windows XP) and not out of the desire to benefit from any new advances in Windows 7. There are none.
It didn’t used to be this way. Installing a new operating system used to be like getting a whole new computer. Installing Windows 95 over Windows 3.1? That was a huge improvement. Installing Windows 2000 on top of Windows 95? That was a big leap forward. There were reasons to upgrade back then, for example:
* Windows 95 - Greatly simplified interface; much more friendly to the average user
* Windows 98 - Improved multimedia capabilities and built-in Internet functionality
* Windows 2000 - Industrial-strength Windows NT code base, but in a much more polished package
* Windows XP - Unified the Win9x and WinNT/2K code bases; allowed businesses to standardize on one OS
* Windows Vista - ?
* Windows 7 - ?
Part of what’s going here is that the computer operating system has achieved a level of maturity and efficiency. You could even say that work on the OS has reached a point of diminishing returns. How much more efficiency can we wring out of it? What other major innovations are waiting out there?
The /3GB switch allocates 3 GB of virtual address space to an application that uses IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE in the process header. This switch allows applications to address 1 GB of
additional virtual address space above 2 GB.