topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 18, 2024, 1:31 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kzinnato [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1]
1
Skwire Empire / Re: Wishing for a blank line
« on: May 25, 2018, 05:23 PM »
geez yeah, sorry .. sChecklist by Skwire Empire

2
Skwire Empire / Wishing for a blank line
« on: May 25, 2018, 04:01 PM »
Would love to see the two following changes
1) A checkbox with no text next to it becomes a blank line
2) 3 checkbox options, blank, checkmark and filled. Could use filled checkbox as a section header.

I have used and loved this program for so many years and I encourage anyone reading this to DONATE .. we need to encourage J to write more creative programs like this and sWeather, sPlaylistMake, sLyrics, etc.

3
Screenshot Captor / Re: Version number anomaly
« on: August 14, 2010, 08:13 AM »
Thanks for the quick reply, but I must humbly disagree with you. First, the version that I just downloaded from your website is 2.83.02 if we go by what the installer says. The version on CNET and Softpedia is version 2.83.01. The executable they install is dated 8/5 whereas yours is 8/7. They appear to both be using an earlier build. (2.83.01 vs. your 2.83.02)

I have never known any programmer not to use the internal version number (FileVersion or ProductVersion) as the authoritative way to determine the version number of their program. I highly suggest you do in fact version stamp your executable. Secunia's PSI, CNETs TechTracker, and many other programs will then no longer have a "false positive".

Finally   .. let me be pretty clear to anyone who might be reading this that although I have a difference of opinion about how best version control may be done, ScreenshotCaptor is still IMHO the finest screenshot capturing program around!!

4
Screenshot Captor / Version number anomaly
« on: August 14, 2010, 07:47 AM »
There are major issues going on with the ScreenshotCaptor download and version. TechTracker tells me I have an out of date version, so I go check it and it is in fact reporting that the version I just downloaded and installed, which says it is version 2.83.01 on your website,  installs version 2.28.5.0 on my pc. (the executable is dated 8/7/2010). So,  I just checked the version on CNET and the installer is the same size but does not binary compare to what is on the OFFICIAL website. And it installs a version 2.28.5.0 that does not binary compare to the version I installed using YOUR installer.

HELP!!!

Pages: [1]