topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 25, 2024, 1:07 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bamse [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17next
251
Forgot that using paid "solution" could mean you will not use FREE stuff? If so it can be hard to avoid getting drowned in features. I still say Avast (Internet Suite), has not so much to annoy you with but build in sandbox is cool. But you could check something special and weird like Prevx http://www.prevx.com/products.asp Very much focused on attacks from internet side, through browser. I read Prevx normal file scanner is mainly there to calm down those who live in the past and feel better seeing a bar move against 100% :)

They have a free version targeting browser only, "Safeonline" http://www.prevx.com...r=4367&pn=routes Can add that to Avast+blocking ideas.

252
Turn brain off, scared, Kaspersky/Malwarebytes found a bunch of stuff. Something is not right :) Unless you can roll back to where problem started, can and have analyzed incident you should not dump AV just yet. Was it Limewire?, porn?, warez?, usb stick? not updated flash getting tricked by your clicks? You forgot to log in as std. user? You must know how to get infected and your own usage in details to be sure there is no need for AV.

But you can get close. Increase passive protection like using a dns-service which blocks malware sites effectively. So forget about Opendns. Then use some browser add-on which effectively blocks more of the same. Let browser itself be unless you want to get rid of ads. Can claim that is a security threat as well. Some are, scams at least. Now to AV. Install Avast 5 but do a custom install. Untick everything but File and Network shield. File shield because that is Avast! and network shield because it also block malware domains :) Behavior shield is still under development, might be worth considering if on 32bit OS. Rest is fluff. Do a full scan, reboot, fire up task manager and keep eye on cpu time, i/o read/write. There is practically none and you have not even tweaked settings.

Last week I tried beta of MSE 2.0, feels way better than 1.0 - caching is magic, now also in MSE. More setttings to fiddle with, can be tuned for speed. So you can go all Microsoft if not in mood for Avast or other free offers with risk of ads, toolbars, changing policies. I only trust Avast in this regard. Still too high cpu usage for my taste but since MSE 1.0 is popular I guess 2.0 will be worshiped.

All this you can test in VM. Go to a site listing latest and greatest malware links. How easy is it to get infected, even with brain turned off? Not impossible but much is blocked with little to no overhead or requirements. If you can also manage to keep all important stuff updated I would like to know details of how normal internet activity can go wrong - with you being on top of Windows things in general I bet very unlikely. Not through "downloads" at least. Does not include warez of course.

I think this is the best you can do if not in the mood for auto-quarantine, auto "safe-runs", auto sandboxing and what other gadgets AV-makers come up with. See feature list from Norton, Kaspersky etc. Typically only available in full paid packages. They are aware signature security is only half the story, has always been the case. ClamWin has cloud testing today! Not a weakness but opportunity to suggest you need more "layers" ;)

If your real problem is more the "feeling" of being attacked you should still do this but then also learn about removal. Like you should know why Kasperskys TDSSKiller is so popular, or Hitman Pro, Combofix. Tons of tools. Also you can without much trouble have several bootable cds ready. Throw them all on a usb stick, multi-boot. There are programs for this, well I only know one but I think there are more. Find a "bootable" oriented site. If preparing for cyber attack make you feel better then prepare. Worst than can happen is you get a more realistic relationship to "security" problems. Get rid of the "scared" part perhaps. When scared you listen to security gossip which is not the same as useful consumer information.

tranglos, last I tried Hitman Pro I could add "/quiet" to entry in task scheduler so popup window went away. Was not reset during program update. So if you change schedule to once per year I guess that should equal no bootup scanning. Test. I did not think much of Hitman Pro to begin with but it seems to improve and improve. You know "Force Breach" or hold-down-left-CTRL-button trick? Brilliant.

253
I recently noticed a debate among locale marketing people who were a bit concerned about Google allowing opt-out of Analytics. But they seem to agree that only few people would even become aware of the option, like other opt-outs from advertising servers. They figured it was mainly a tactic move to prevent future law suits (from EU most likely). May be you would have more impact on the battle of clicks if you got hands dirty and became a Google expert? Hold them to their claims, make reasonable demands and complaints, enlighten the sheep?  

Remember that some see Google more as a defender of "info" than an enemy but that view might depend on geo-location - I mean which country you live in. The commercialized internet you hate might be best thing ever else where.

Also remember that computer and access to internet is not a human right which can be protected. From the moment you push ON button you are a consumer. That many in rich parts of the world need to be connected give food for thought of course. Politicians will have a plan :)

254
Your link is a cliche it self Kartel. Only paranoid will see that as a nice kick starter for a debate about alternative search engines/internet. Arguments if you can call it that is similar to those promoting Linux by thrashing Windows. Paraonoid or those who don't understand that the more you use Google the more you know about them. Like for example their Dashboard letting user handle and get overview of all accounts, setting up public profile or not etc. Have you seen Microsofts "Dashboard"? This is essential for these type of services and where they show how they view users/customers I think. If you look at their privacy pages it seems they are more concerned than most users ever will be! To some degree you can even decide which type of ad you will see.

If real details make "tracking" and spying look less of a threat then skip them. Also acknowledge there are different definitions of what privacy is. Heard of Facebook? old phonebook may be? Now you say privacy is not so important, your fantasy is, but read article again. Main thought is privacy is screwed because of Google.

Without reading the text see if you can find the "error" in this Microsoft video http://www.ghacks.ne...-explorer-8-privacy/ On level with your link and pretty typical for security debate. "Proof" is carefully selected and presented. The one who scream the loudest win. Btw. did you know Microsoft give intelligence agencies access to Windows sourcecode? New meaning to "phone home" threat perhaps? Should be doable.

https://www.donation....msg199256#msg199256 has much more meat on it :) Thinking unknown 3rd party proxies, playing hide and seek is going to change anything is silly. Sells tickets to the often self important "geeky" part of internet users, they have fun with that and quiet down.

255
Living Room / Re: Do toolbars really snoop?
« on: March 31, 2010, 09:30 PM »
Depends on how you define sensitive but read on http://about.ask.com.../about/privacy.shtml

Many different oppinions about toolbars, I happen to like Googles since it has possible useful functions. Each button can be moved as well so more a collection of buttons than a static pixel eating toolbar. Like Web developer toolbar for Firefox.

Look out for those amateur toolbars from Conduit or rather build with their tools. Anyone can do that so there are 1000s available. They can contain whatever, even scripts. Easier to put in affiliate IDs and such tricks. I am sure it has been done already but if you want to make some money build one for porn or torrent/warez links, add affiiate links - custom search is there already. How Conduit make money, possibly it is shared with you. If you make a default toolbar it is harmless but as you will see from their site marketing ideas are welcomed there. Sign up and test. Marketing = need for stats which is why toolbar phone home to server when someone installs. There could be more but I don't think it has ever been proven anything evil is going on, just marketing :) Conduit don't control what users add of content so who knows. How well they check each one I don't know. Most toolbars you might find interesting are probably from Conduit. You can see it from the homepage each toolbar has. There is a program you can buy for developing your own, don't remember name but could be solution to "risk" - if you must have toolbar.

256
Only interesting because they all have been buggy as hell for years so works well in some combinations/setups, not so much in others. Online Armor has points with me because of user interface which is clearly meant to be used - opposite most others in this category. Will almost say it is easy to use but still a security product so trial and error.

I thought most considered Matousec test to be invalid or at least irrelevant to common sense and users?

I was reading on Spybot forum yesterday and some guy got his machine cleaned. After that last post from the helper was a long long one suggesting to do all sorts of things. Half of them useless but they mean well. Among those suggestions were "better" firewalls from "these excellent vendors" blah blah. The guy then replied with something like in all due respect he would not use a firewall because he had been through a Comodo phase - and failed. He ended up approving everything and quickly got tired of problems - which is how real life works unless you have security on the brain. Just theory unless adjusted to humans. You not only need to see the point of complicating computer life but also have a special mindset I think. Not knowing too much about security as well perhaps :) Brilliant reply. Not a question of looking at numbers or ranks but if program is usable.

Sphinx Firewall Control is cool if interesting in outgoing signals http://www.sphinx-so...com/Vista/index.html but he is also beta-testing away, see forum. Will satisfy most people but of course only a minor part of a "real" firewall, including AV, HIPS and what not.

257
General Software Discussion / Re: updating Firefox plugins sucks!
« on: March 27, 2010, 10:59 AM »
http://blog.mozilla....eople-upgrade-flash/ is why it does not suck and one of the many easy to fix reasons there are security problems. High percentage have no clue and will not maintain the handful of really important plugins known to be seen as en entry by malware makers. Many must also either disable autoupdate from Adobe or just ignore/cancel or how else can they detect so high percentage? May be "problem" is people being sceptical to sudden pop-ups so they cancel? Flash does not advertise update window much, will just appear X days after new release. Implementation, Flash update window, is wrong then. Better to let Mozilla take care of it. Well another page said something about problems detecting versions through a web page but if it can't detect Adobe pdf-plugin value decreases a lot. I guess they will not make this work automatically for all plugins until all are recognized. Sending people off to Google in search of updates is not optimal.

They have bigger plans, Plugin Directory http://blog.mozilla....he-plugin-directory/ Version check is part of that project.

258
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 16, 2010, 10:50 PM »
Good Target point out actual need for better compression. Kind of the idea with these tools. May be more obvious if you have suffered from zip-format back when a floppy could be distribution media. Worldwide adoption of zip(winzip!) was annoying. Fast internet, big drives makes format less important, not an issue for most who are so lucky to have these things.

259
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 16, 2010, 09:17 PM »
True, zip all the way. And with the right attitude that will never change, WinZip is also cool. How come pirates have always been more open to alternatives? I put money on better compression ratios. Why was ARJ popular in the old days? Again compression ratios. So if there is a desire to find something better look for a program which is excellent in compressing, focus - later worry about missing features, GUI, pretty icons, what your friends will think, how likely it is to become a universal std. There are not many to choose from or much reason to love 7Zip. Pretty sure none are useful if FreeArc is out of the question because planned fixes are not yet implemented, unheard of! Those long lists at benchmarks sites just looks impressive but check out details, if there are any. Having same standards towards them as you do Winrar or even 7Zip will dismiss most of them very fast.

260
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 16, 2010, 10:08 AM »
I don't have to look far for people who have no clue what a rar or 7z file but those people know nothing about technical details - which was my point or assumption. Well since Ubuntu Software Center have a "7 Zip" entry may be difference to Windows is not that big. Click, click - now supported. It also handles RAR, Zip64, cab and more.

261
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 16, 2010, 09:55 AM »
7Zip on Windows is also a rare case - unless you know it. Are you sure majority know Zip? Majority will probably have used Zip but do they know what it is? what alternatives there are? I doubt it.

There is even a 7zip plugin for Nautilus/File Roller in Ubuntu http://sourceforge.net/projects/p7zip/ so people can easily get 7zip compatibility if they want. Matter of public opinion and awareness.

262
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 15, 2010, 11:15 PM »
Nope, PAQ is not an option. Time becomes a priority when it take 10+ min to pack 50mb on fastest setting. I gave up at default and maximum. The others are snappy.

Total Commander folder zipped:

7Z Ultra lzma 11.863.385
7Z Ultra lzma2 11.839.834
ARC best 11.455.354
PAQ8O fastest 11.004.214
WinRAR best 12.950.766

PeaZip is apparently not optimized for FreeArc, when program itself is used result improves

ARC best 11.340.604

Too bad WinRK is payware http://www.maximumco.../data/summary_mf.php

263
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 15, 2010, 10:07 PM »
Depends on how you read tables but if you click Benchmark link at their site you see

As net result, FreeArc provides the same compression ratio as zip/bzip2/rar/7-zip (in different modes) while being 1.5–3x faster, and in maximum compression mode it compress 2-10% better than 7-zip while providing the same speed. Make sure of this yourself by looking at test results or by performing your own benchmarks.

I have found that to be true though could not care less about speed. When there is need for better compression time is not high priority. Many options when packing, one requires 2gb ram to extract  8) You have to know them all to evaluate tables. Test.

The PAQ one Tuxman seems to be supported in PeaZip so should be easy to use? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAQ Might be even better than FreeArc then. Looks like crap in "Results sorted on compressor efficiency" tables but not relevant.

264
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 15, 2010, 08:34 PM »
May be some will uninstall 7Zip, Winrar and change to FreeArc but most will only use it when better compression is required - so not silly to focus on that part. Actually only reason to even care. Why it is mentioned and what was requested or wondered about in first post.

265
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Windows 7
« on: March 15, 2010, 05:41 AM »
Talking to me Josh? Is in the link but I bet those pushing that site now wish they never did. Especially site SEO, heh. This is a site for IT pros not amateurs you know ;) With 99.99% certainty fake site is offline btw, or almost. Good story since it shows those who should not know better not always do. Less IT knowledgeable or industry knowledgeable people will be even easier to trick.

Yeah, look out for that plastic card. Making a fake payment setup could be part of the plan.

266
General Software Discussion / Re: Trying to remember an old game
« on: March 15, 2010, 05:29 AM »
H.E.R.O ? http://www.youtube.c...ure=player_embedded# If your memory is a bit screwed it could be the one. Great game.

267
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 15, 2010, 05:14 AM »
Compression, compression, compression.

268
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Windows 7
« on: March 14, 2010, 12:06 PM »
http://www.technibbl...?p=112282#post112282 so don't feel bad about making gigantic mistake. Professionals do it as well. They put great offers in newsletter, in blog posts but eventually brain starts to work again and ooops. The guy who promoted discount MS products has like 200 posts on their forum. I am sure he had that planned since signing up. Building up some sort of reputation and then it comes :) Domain was registered 2 weeks before they thought fellow techies should know about gift shop. No one checked. Is a forum for IT people so direct contact with many potential customers. Clever. Porn and opportunity to save $$$ can make you go blind.

269
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 14, 2010, 11:59 AM »
You are missing the point of better compression ratios. That FreeArc also is cross-platform, opensource and an easy to use GUI just makes it better. And a lot different than most alternatives. Why they say "it’s superior to any existing practical compressor" They hint at strange command line tools which might be better in some tests. FreeArc is ready to go which is why you had to scroll past long list of features and advantages to find planned fixes.

Compatibility means very little in this context but it does SFX as well. Many have used 7zip without knowing what it is. Can be used in Total Commander, PeaZip, Innosetup as they say. Don't expect Windows 7 SP1 to support arc format but who cares.

270
What's the Best? / Re: Best file archiver/compresser
« on: March 13, 2010, 03:54 PM »
None of them are any good in comparisons, Squeeze Chart and Maximum Compression but you would also like a usable gui, being able to finish compressing before you must sleep and something that has been proven to work. I think some of these strange formats either die out or get bought by whoever. FreeArc seems like the most promising. Not only better compression than 7-Zip, WinRar, also faster! What they say.

271
Living Room / Re: Using XP System Restore Offline
« on: March 12, 2010, 04:51 PM »
I ran into ERD here http://www.winhelpon...ootable-xp-computer/ where it also says it works on SP3. How big is the iso? Should be 152.805.376 I hope. There are quite a few not so legal copies available. Difference between home vs. pro seems weird. Can you find anyone with that problem on Google?

Good for corrupted registry but if infection is problem may be better to use a bootable scanner.

272
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« on: March 12, 2010, 03:29 PM »
Slightly different idea on how to mix community with business http://www.techdirt....306/1649198451.shtml or Ars employees are crybabies :)

273
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« on: March 11, 2010, 04:50 AM »
Not the worst site regarding ads but they made big mistake here since they join forces with stupid marketing based sites, like some newspapers! who won't even give access. Those who just don't understand or value users. Their point gets lost. White listing or not is a test of relationship between site and user, they should deal with it - expect losses.

I like Lifehacker which have mentioned adblocking methods many times. How-tos etc. Very relaxed. Some sites, forums don't even want this mentioned. All about the money, revenue so control of user behavior is high priority. The guy who make Adblock Plus is also open to more "fair" adblocking http://adblockplus.o...-to-fair-ad-blocking Dark forces are marketers and old timers ;) As Linus Torvalds say about Windows they should have been shot in the head 15 years ago :)

274
General Software Discussion / Re: Recommend anti-spyware, please?
« on: March 09, 2010, 02:50 PM »
There are pros can cons. See what Avast list in todays update

low priority scans now use much less CPU (but run accordingly longer)

Result according to clock sucks then but may be you forget to click stop because scanning was almost unnoticable? :) Have to use program on own computer to get an idea. Some people like me cry over MSE usage of cpu and generally being way too active - others say it is lighest av ever.

275
Living Room / Re: Google does no evil; kills reMail
« on: March 09, 2010, 09:28 AM »
Yes but the fact they open sourced it is another sign of Googles dominance hence the action is bad and only made to shut up doubters. A real company would never do that ;)

Pages: prev1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17next