6
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows XP Myths
« on: July 20, 2006, 05:43 AM »
I'm a committed sceptic. I don't trust people who tell me I can speed up my computer by some mysterious fiddle that Microsoft apparently forgot to do, or by buying a tune-up product, and I also don't trust Microsoft. This document trusts Microsoft too much, I think.
Running as a limited user, specifically, is indispensable but not sufficient in a security recipe. Someday something nasty is going to leap out of Internet Explorer at me. I do encounter applications that don't work as limited user, and if I have to then I'll run them on my desktop as Administrator sessions. Apparently this will be easier in Vista. But, developers, I want to hear how you justify demanding full control of my PC. I don't have full control of my PC. I don't really understand what a Registry is. And it's -my- PC. So why should -you- get control of it??
It's like you're a guest in my home and you want the keys to the safe and the gun locker...
Specific root-only applications that I use include the Fitaly on-screen keyboard (I think it doesn't address the registry in a proper multi-user way - and its market is too small to demand a fix), and the software for Hauppauge DEC-2000T PC-DTV receiver, which is broken in a lot of other ways (video doesn't work on my Tablet PC; sound randomly cuts out of plays half an hour late[!?]; timed recording consist of using Task Scheduler to open and close the application, each time rebooting the hardware twice).
I use "ExplorerXP" as a file manager which I can run as Administrator to handle files for stoopid applications - amongst the things I can't see a way to run as Administrator from a limited desktop are Windows Explorer and Internet Explorer.
Running as a limited user, specifically, is indispensable but not sufficient in a security recipe. Someday something nasty is going to leap out of Internet Explorer at me. I do encounter applications that don't work as limited user, and if I have to then I'll run them on my desktop as Administrator sessions. Apparently this will be easier in Vista. But, developers, I want to hear how you justify demanding full control of my PC. I don't have full control of my PC. I don't really understand what a Registry is. And it's -my- PC. So why should -you- get control of it??
It's like you're a guest in my home and you want the keys to the safe and the gun locker...
Specific root-only applications that I use include the Fitaly on-screen keyboard (I think it doesn't address the registry in a proper multi-user way - and its market is too small to demand a fix), and the software for Hauppauge DEC-2000T PC-DTV receiver, which is broken in a lot of other ways (video doesn't work on my Tablet PC; sound randomly cuts out of plays half an hour late[!?]; timed recording consist of using Task Scheduler to open and close the application, each time rebooting the hardware twice).
I use "ExplorerXP" as a file manager which I can run as Administrator to handle files for stoopid applications - amongst the things I can't see a way to run as Administrator from a limited desktop are Windows Explorer and Internet Explorer.