Messages - Tinman57 [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 254next
101

  You know the criminal justice system is making millions when there are companies running private prisons.  The small town I live close to just built a jail facility that houses 107 inmates.  Why would a small town need that much space?  They take in prisoners from other counties, and even other states for profit.  They get paid something like $34 a day per inmate.  That's $3,638 a day profit.  There's big money to be made in the criminal justice system.....  Also, the county I live in has 5 state prisons!......  Texas has the 2nd largest prison system in the U.S.  So the saying goes for this state, "Go on vacation, leave on probation".....

102
  Just like the government to throw the baby out with the bath-water.  Goes to show just how ignorant our government is of technology.  How do they get rid of malware on computer systems?  Destroy the computers and peripherals!!!

Worst IT fail ever? US agency spends millions in useless security
A branch of the U.S. Commerce Department recently trashed perfectly good computers and wasted millions on a bogus malware infection. How did this happen?

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/it-security/worst-it-fail-ever-us-agency-spends-millions-in-useless-security/

103
Living Room / 3D Printers - Dirty Secret
« on: July 26, 2013, 08:47 PM »

3D printers have a dirty secret
Before your buy that magical 3D printer for your home or office, know this: that mini-factory-in-a-box could be harmful to your health.

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/bulletin/3d-printers-have-a-dirty-secret/25035

104
Another article I just read states this was a good thing because it was so close of a vote.  Their thinking is once the word gets out who voted against it, they will get voted out on the next election, bringing in more politicians that won't support it (or claim to anyway) and eventually getting all this invasion of the U.S. Constitution crap repealed.

Who wrote that? Good? Yes, because the voting publicgoldfish has such a wonderful memory. :P :D

  I think it was in the last fightforthefuture.org newsletter, or a link in their newsletter led to the article.

  The voting public has the attention span of a 6 week old puppy, and most of them vote party lines whether they're screwing up or not.....

105
^Funny. I know a whole raft of defense contract engineers and they've all said pretty much the opposite about a lot of Russian tech. Especially their aircraft. Described them as all balls and no finesse with decades old electronics.

Also just had a friend (non US citizen working for a non-US company btw) come back from China and Russia. He's an EE with a PhD in physics. He was very impressed by what he saw of China's tech - and very unimpressed with what Russia showed him.

Guess it all depends on who saw what - and who you talk to. ;D

  Russian aircraft technology is waaaaaay behind the U.S.  Their aircraft, while looking sleek, are very heavy.  While their engines produce a lot of thrust, they are heavy and don't get good gas mileage.  Basically they still use nuts and bolts where U.S. aircraft use high stress rivets and special titanium bolts, which makes for a much lighter aircraft.  Not to mention titanium airframes and boron carbide for high stress panels, flight control surfaces and speed brakes.
  Of course there's a lot of "other" things that goes along with this, but I signed a non-disclosure agreement and really don't want to go to jail....   :o

Dunno. This was about 17 years ago, so that was then...

I remember they described an SU (IIRC) fighter that could hover while oriented vertically, fall backwards then fly upside down. (I don't recall the model number or if they'd mentioned it.) Kind of like this:

1)
------>

2)
stop, hover & flip

3)
<------

They'd seen it in defense videos and claimed that there wasn't anything in the west that approached the maneuverability of that particular jet.

But it really does depend on who you talk to. A lot of stuff is not very well known, and then you have things like that one general alluded to - god only knows what he was talking about. (I forget the reference - perhaps someone else knows.)

I've still got a defense catalog and DVD around here somewhere from a gig a while back. Some of the weaponry in there is pretty freaky. e.g. There's a type of rifle/rocket/grenade launcher in it designed to kill people that have taken cover behind something or that are in a foxhole. The projectile simply explodes overhead, killing everything underneath. I forget the details. (Oddly enough, the actual physical catalog and DVD I saw that in you can't get without clearance, but they at one point had a lot of it publicly available on an open web site. Go figger.)


  Personally I wouldn't trust any video unless it was examined and proven to be real and not some video graphics.  They've hyped up things in the past, like their Mig 25 Foxbat's, trying to make the rest of the world think they had superior technology.  It actually worked for a while until a Soviet-U.S. spy found different.  lol  While they are a beautiful aircraft, well, see my post above.

  As far as the exploding ordinance, it is being (or has been) tested and in production by a U.S. company.  Israel, on the other hand, has created a automatic carbine rifle that shoots around the corner.  Not only that, but it has a video scope with laser dot accuracy. Now that's pretty awesome.

Pages: prev1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 254next
Go to full version