topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday April 23, 2024, 8:25 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - IainB [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16next
126
As it says here: http://www.winamp.com/media-player/en
Winamp.com and associated web services will no longer be available past December 20, 2013. Additionally, Winamp Media players will no longer be available for download. Please download the latest version before that date. See release notes for latest improvements to this last release.
Thanks for supporting the Winamp community for over 15 years.

128
Mini-Reviews by Members / Everdesk (with Google Add-on) - Mini-Review
« on: November 18, 2013, 07:19 PM »
Originally posted:2013-11-19
Last updated2016-04-06

Basic Info
App NameEverdesk - 02 Logo (small).png    EverDesk with Google Add-on
DescriptionEverDesk Standard is a client-based email tool that can handle any/most of the webmail services except Gmail, but the version with the Google Add-on supports full integration with Google Gmail and with related Google services e.g., including Google Drive. (This can be far more useful than one might at first realise.)
Their website at https://www.everdesk.com/features points out the unique characteristics of EverDesk, where it says: (my emphasis)
  • EverDesk is the first and only email client on the market which stores email messages together with your other files and documents, so you can keep all the information related to the same subject together in regular Windows folders and work with it in a simpler, more flexible, and more powerful way.
Thumbs-Up Rating :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup::Thmbsup:After extended trial and retrial.   :)
App URLhttps://www.everdesk.com/
App Version ReviewedEverdesk v5.8.7 (Google Edition)
Test System SpecsMS Win7-64 HP, Win10-64 PRO
Supported OSesPC Windows (various)
Support MethodsSupport on Everdesk website: https://www.everdesk.com/support
Upgrade PolicyFree incremental upgrades within a main version number.
Trial Version Available?Yes - fully-functional (uncrippled) copy with 30-day licence life.
Pricing SchemeEverdesk with Google Add-on - US$44.95

Intro and Overview:
For me, the biggest nuisance about web-based email is that email and its attachments are stored in a peculiar proprietary manner in the cloud, whereas I usually want it all on my local client device too (a laptop), where I can access it easily and back it up. Where this is possible at all (rarely), it is difficult/time consuming to organise with most client software. I want my email integrated with and accessible via my PIM (Personal Information Manager) system - which latter comprises a set of tools on my laptop.

Taking advantage of a GAOTD 100% discount offer for EverDesk Standard, I had tried out EverDesk following a post about it on the DC Forum by @Curt:: EverDesk stores emails in your normal folders with other docs
However, I discovered:
..doesn't work with Gmail
According to EverDesk's own notes that I read, this is true.

So I realised that I would need EverDesk with Google Add-on, not the EverDesk Standard, so I downloaded EverDesk with Google Add-on and had an extended trial. I then changed laptops and reinstalled a trial version on the newer laptop, and I am currently trialling it again and this time am wanting to buy it, because it is rather good - if not excellent - at what it does.
Here is a link to a comparison of the features between EverDesk 5.6 Standard and EverDesk 5.6 with Google Add-on  - https://www.everdesk.com/features

Example screenshot: of the Main GUI window:
(Arrows to some noteworthy points.)

Everdesk - 03 Main GUI screen.png


Who this software is designed for:
Anyone who wants:
  • To be able to operate their Gmail account(s) from a desktop email client.
  • To have copies of all Gmail emails stored on the local client in non-proprietary format, and all attached documents stored on the local client in original format, all of which is to be accessible from the client via Windows Explorer (or similar), and able to be opened by the relevant desktop applications.
  • To have full integration between the desktop email client and Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, Google Contacts.

The Good:
  • Very nice and user-friendly GUI.
  • Amazingly useful functionality - needs to be experienced firsthand to be appreciated.
  • The application is stable (no crashes) and gives an incredibly useful integration between a desktop email client and the Google services mentioned. It lets me quite easily do what I have often wanted to do with my Gmail, but could not do before, or that I could only do with considerable difficulty/mucking about.
  • Exercise prudent caution re bandwidth: For any email account you set it to operate, EverDesk can automatically download your email and any attached files from the webmail server. If one has a cap on bandwidth utilisation - as I do - then one needs to be conscious of this. For example, where I am on a mailing list for a newsletter of interest, and which periodically emails newsletters with unsolicited/unwanted and sometimes quite large video files attached, I take the precautionary step of deleting those emails and/or their video file attachments online before starting up EverDesk.

Needs Improvement:
  • No notes on this as at this stage. I have not seen any drawbacks in the software.
  • I have had one error recently where a polite message popped up giving a full report of a non-critical error ("index out of range") that it would "send home". It then gave me the option to continue or restart. I restarted.

Why I think you should use this product:
If you are interested in taking control of your Gmail as a client-based tool (application and data) and moving a step ahead in management of your own Google account data (including integration between the desktop email client and Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, Google Contacts), then this email client/PIM could well be of interest to you.

How it compares to similar products:
I have no experience/knowledge of alternative/similar products, because there isn't one (as I have established), however, in the DCF thread linked to above, mention is made of DreamMail, but this gives the notice:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Spoiler
END OF SUPPORT

Hello,
I have been supporting DreamMail for almost 8 years, but as you may know, I am not the developer. I created DreamMail Europe Community website, because I thought DreamMail was one of the best email clients. So I used to spend some time translating into French and creating this website and forum.

But now, it's been more than a year I have no reply from Zeng Xiquan, and I cannot continue supporting this software without him. So I decided to end this adventure, and move forward.
So, I will *NOT* reply to future emails, and this page will disappear soon.

Also, a vulnerability has been found, and a Proof of Concept is available here : http://www.exploit-d....com/exploits/27805/ (thanks to loneferret)
I receive spams with trying to use this exploit now, so you MUST change your email software.

There are many email software available (Thunderbird, Opera Mail, ...), so you can check one of these to get support.

This community website is now over, so do not blame me, but I cannot continue this.

BUT, I will let the forum available, so you can continue to ask question and help others.
You can access it here : http://forum.dreammail.eu/

Thank you and see you on new projects.

Clément


One of the OutlinerSoftware discussions in the references below refers to SquadMail, which is more of a nifty group collaboration tool using Gmail and DropBox (as a paid service).

Conclusions:
  • I have been pleasantly surprised and impressed with what this email client does. It definitely seems to live up to its description.
  • I have yet to discover the limits of its potential. It is arguably more of a PIM than just a simple email tool, though it seems to be an excellent email tool in its own right.
  • It is No-fuss, simple and quick to download and install, with the only tricky thing being the installation of the Google IMAP settings and security - one has to disable Gmail 2-step verification and enable "less secure application access". It is relatively straightforward if one follows the clear installation instructions - which I did not do, at first.    :-[
  • Good news!: I really wanted to have a licence for this EverDesk-Gmail version and had decided to await a BDJ or GAOTD discounted offer or similar - due to the cost. Then I wondered whether I could get a discount from EverDesk directly, so I emailed their support desk, asked them if they could give me a discount, pointed them to this review and expressed my real interest in their product over the years. I have just received an email from them. They have had me on their database since my 2012 EverDesk-Standard licence, and they gave me a licence for the EverDesk-Gmail version FREE because I had effectively been promoting their software by extolling its features and benefits. I am very grateful for this.    :Thmbsup:

References/links:

129
I am a user of Firefox 26 from the beta channel. (OS is Win7-64 Home Premium.)
Today I downloaded and installed Internet Explorer 11 onto a laptop. It required a restart of the laptop, which spent a long time "adjusting settings" before it eventually shut down and restarted.
After restart, everything seemed fine until I started up Firefox, which crashed immediately it was started, before even getting up any browser window. This was consistently repeatable and popped up an error window with the choice of restart or resetting all the Firefox settings - the latter I wished to avoid doing.
Otherwise, Firefox worked OK in protected mode.

So, as an experiment, I download Firefox 26 from the beta channel and installed it. Worked a treat.
Problem solved.

UPDATE 2013-12-25 1142hrs: - just for the record in this thread I started:
The fact of Firefox crashing after I had installed IE11 was, it seems, just a coincidence. I kept FF on its last stable ß update and stopped allowing FF to automatically update. After skipping 3 updates this way, I allowed the 4th one, and it was stable. Subsequent updates have been stable also.
Meanwhile IE11 has been running solid/stable all the time.

130
Living Room / Issues in Windows 8.0 and 8.1 migration
« on: November 06, 2013, 07:37 AM »
To be, or not to be...

On 2013-02-01, for $49.99, I bought Windows8 Pro Upgrade. However, I have held off installing it due to the advent of Win8.1.
After reading this: How to uninstall Windows 8.1 | How To - CNET, I have to admit to being a little uncertain.
I would be interested in the advice/experiences of DCF members regarding this migration.
My current OS is Win7-64 Home Premium, Build 7601.

131
Living Room / Colletta - a project in MS Labs
« on: October 27, 2013, 06:47 AM »
I'd be interested in any comments from people who might have trialled this software:
Project Colletta
The Project
The Microsoft Research Project Colletta helps you manage your tasks, activities and related resources. It allows you to tag documents, images, emails, web pages and other items that are useful for performing a given task or activity. You can create tags that refer to activities, people, places, events, or anything that is helpful to you. You can even attach multiple tags to your documents. Project Colletta is integrated with your applications, so you can start tagging documents even if you haven't yet saved them. You can access all your activities and tagged resources either via the Project Colletta DeskBar application or via several application toolbars.
Take the Tour
Watch the video to get an overview of how Colletta can help you manage your files and activities.
(embedded Silverlight video)

I downloaded the software and ran the install, but it repeatedly hangs at about 25% of the progress bar, whilst the install process sits at about 13% CPU utilisation.
I'd like to try it out (it looks rather interesting), but it's difficult to do that when the installer hangs.
After cancelling the process, an error message says:
Project Colletta
One or more issues caused the setup to fail. Please fix the issues and then retry setup.
For more information see the log file.
0x80070490 - Element not found.

The install log says that the problem is:
Failed to cache payload: vstor_redist.exe from working path: C:\Temp\{d6074b06-1636-45dd-bf35-baf3e6d131d2}\vstor_redist.exe, error: 0x80070490.
But I watched the temp directory used during install, and the vstor_redist.exe is created and deleted by the installer, so it might be a bug(?).
I haven't found any help on this on the MS forums site.

132
I have Geek Squeaks in my feed-reader.
Looking at the post Today’s Geek Squeaks – October 22, 2013 I followed a link to Snap2HTML, which is on the website http://www.rlvision.com/

rlvision.com has some rather curious and interesting software.

133
Living Room / MaskMe extension - PMI (Plus, Minus, Interesting)
« on: October 13, 2013, 08:53 PM »
I am very interested in the ideas put forward in The Online Privacy Blog re: How Adobe’s 2.9 million hacked users could have beaten the data breach
- and what they propose doing with the Firefox extension MaskMe:
A Password Manager That Protects Your Privacy
Create and manage secure passwords, and mask your email, phone, and credit card as you browse and shop on the web.

I would be interested in what he DCF members/brainstrust might make of this Firefox extension.

I'll start by suggesting that it seems like you would only have to trust this ONE thing to manage the others - a bit like "One ring to rule them all".
But is that one thing secure?
Is there anything else like this on the market (I haven't come across anything)?

134
Living Room / Google's Storage Problem
« on: October 11, 2013, 11:10 PM »
There are a lot of discussion threads referring to the pros/cons/comparisons of different Cloud storage services of one form or another, and I wasn't sure which one to post this to, so here it is on its own. I thought it was potentially quite useful in making the points that it does:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Google's Storage Problem
A lot of people wonder what happens when you stop paying for additional Google storage. Google doesn't delete your files, but you're forced to delete some of them because you can't upload new files until you use less than 15GB of storage (your quota may be different).

A downside of Google's shared storage system is that it affects both Gmail and Google+ Photos, not just Google Drive. Gmail used to offer 10GB of free storage, Picasa Web/Google+ Photos only 1GB and Google Drive - 5GB. Small photos (< 2048x2048) and short videos (less than 15 minutes) uploaded using Google+ Photos, as well as the documents, spreadsheets and presentations created using Google's Drive apps don't count towards your storage limit.

"If you exceed your quota limit, you'll receive warnings in each product and you'll need to correct the issue as soon as you can. Otherwise, you'll be unable to upload additional items to your Drive or photos to Google+, and, after a period of time, incoming messages to your Gmail account will be returned to the sender and you won't be able to send new messages," explains Google.

Now that Yahoo Mail offers 1TB of free storage and Outlook.com "includes email storage that expands to provide you with as much storage space as you need", Gmail's 15GB limit doesn't look that impressive. Maybe Google wants to encourage people to use Google Drive for uploading files, instead of using Gmail attachments.

Yahoo's Flickr service offers 1TB of free photo storage. "No limited pixels, no cramped formats, no memories that fall flat." Suddenly, Google's photo offering is less impressive: you get unlimited photo storage, but only if you resize the photos.

It looks like Google no longer has the edge when it comes to free storage. Gmail offered 1GB of free storage when its main competitors only included a few megabytes of storage. Now roles are reversed.

Posted by Alex Chitu at 10/10/2013 01:41:00 PM

135
Living Room / EditGrid service is ending May 1, 2014
« on: October 05, 2013, 09:32 AM »
From their website:
EditGrid service is ending May 1, 2014
Dear EditGrid user,
After keeping EditGrid.com up and running for a few years as a hobby, it's about time for EditGrid.com to turn its lights off.
On May 1, 2014 at 11:59:59 pm PST, EditGrid.com services will be discontinued. After this date users will no longer be able to log in to EditGrid.com. Content stored on EditGrid.com will be deleted and no longer be accessible. We recommend that you sign in to EditGrid.com before May 1, 2014 and download all your spreadsheets to your computer.
Thank you for using and supporting EditGrid.

David

The EditGrid Team

Some pretty impressive Featured Spreadsheets.

136
Living Room / The issue of Ad-Blocking in our browsers.
« on: October 02, 2013, 11:02 PM »
I thought this was priceless. A rather fatuous and self-aggrandising post in http://blog.pagefair.com was somewhat pwned in classic manner in the comments - where is made a lot of sense arguably reflecting the feelings of a lot of users (including myself).
For posterity (in case it gets deleted), an .mht copy of the page is attached as a .txt file, if you want it (just change the extension to view it in a browser).
* Detect Adblock_ Our Secret Sauce- PageFair Blog mht.txt (254.79 kB - downloaded 683 times.)
Detect Adblock: Our Secret Sauce
Published October 2, 2013 by Cody Beck

How do we do it?
[Image] How do they do it?How do they do it? [Discovery Channel]
We’re often asked how our adblock detection script works its magic: how do we detect that someone is blocking ads? Most people expect us to guard this secret closely, but the truth is we use an approach that’s widely discussed online. We observe what happens when a web page loads and detect the effects of adblocking plugins.

Understand Ad Blocking
In order to know what effects to look out for we need to understand how adblock stops ads from loading. The first technique used to block ads is to intercept requests from the browser to particular domains or for particular files. Most publishers use hosted ad servers that operate from well known domains; for example Google’s display ads are served from doubleclick.net. The adblock community maintains ‘filter lists’ of these domains that are updated regularly with the latest ad server domains. Filter lists also name particular files for which requests should be blocked regardless of domain; for example any javascript file called ads.js.

The second technique used to block ads is to hide ad-related page elements based on css rules. Publishers carefully design their web pages with space for both content and advertising, but when ads are blocked this could leave large, empty areas on screen. The adblock community’s filter lists specify page elements that should be hidden, for example any element with the ID ‘leaderboard-ad’. Page elements that match standard ad dimensions are also hidden. By hiding these page elements, adblock ensures that the space they would have taken up can be re-used by other parts of the page, such as the main page text. This has the bonus side-effect of also hiding any ads that slip by the first blocking technique.

Choose Your Bait Carefully
With these techniques in mind we insert bait elements into the page that adblock will attempt to block; including a javascript file, an image and an iframe. We then carefully observe what happens when a page loads. onLoad and onError events tell us if they’re successfully retrieved or if requests have been blocked. Their css style tells us if they are visible or have been hidden. We have run these tests billions of times, and have now refined them to the point that we can accurately detect when a user is blocking ads using adblock.

The Devil is in the Detail
As always, there’s more to this than meets the eye. Anyone who’s tried their hand at web development will be familiar with the frustration of cross-browser (in)compatibility and the challenge of staying current with a shifting landscape of browser and plugin technologies. Not to mention the challenge of  building a scalable server infrastructure that can handle vast quantities of analytics traffic in real-time.  We won’t bore you with complaints here though; hopefully you’ve now got enough information to understand what’s going on in the background when you sign up to use our free adblock measurement service.

Tags: adblock, detect adblock, technology
← Ad-news For Publishers
END OF POST============================

Comments:

    PhasmaFelis
    So has anybody ever tried to address the root cause of adblocker use, i.e. ads are really fucking annoying? I don’t like ads in general, nobody does, but that alone wouldn’t be enough to make me bother to install and maintain AdBlock. What does it is strobing “YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY WON” and animated “one weird trick” scams and softcore porn. This shit is *everywhere*, even on allegedly respectable news sites.

    If you want me to turn off AdBlock, you need to insist on reasonable, non-offensive, non-animated ads. If your ad provider doesn’t do that, get a better one, or lean on yours until they do. If this industry spent one-tenth as much energy pushing ad services for better quality standards as they do wringing their hands about ad blocking, shit would happen.
        http://brandonbrown.io/ Brandon Brown

        I whole-heartedly agree.
        oGMo

        Yeah seriously. And if your site refuses to load or whatever due to adblock, it wasn’t worth reading anyway. Your content is not that special. I’ll just go elsewhere.

        (Also the techniques discussed in the article are pretty much nothing special and exactly what I would have expected. Expect the next wave of adblockers to alter reporting for elements they block if this becomes necessary.)
            Rick Burgess

            How would you suggest paying for the content? are paywalls less annoying?
                PhasmaFelis

                I would, and did, suggest less offensive ads.
                    Rick Burgess

                    Lets be honest though, ad blockers originally came about to block pop-ups because they were horrible. pop-ups are dead on all but adult sites for the most part and what you have now are small text or image ads thats really aren’t a big deal.

                    You could also argue that even if they made ads that were less “offensive” you would never see them because of your blocker :p
                http://www.trisweb.com/ Tristan

                I suggest a simple and universal “tip” service. You would dedicate a certain amount, such as $5 per month, to be used for tips, and every time you click “tip” (a universal and recognizable UI) it’s recorded. Your $5 budget is then split amongst all the tips clicked that month.

                Obviously you could do a certain micro-payment amount as well if required. Or a simple pay-switch (rather than a wall) — the key is to make it a seamless and universal experience, as easy and ubiquitous as this Disqus form, so you’re not inconveniencing users at all.

                Add a “pay wall” and people will not climb over it. Hell no. But make it easy and fun to pay for content, and people will embrace it and feel good about it.

                This is a UX problem, not an economic problem.
                    Toranaga

                    marketing is the tax you pay for not being interesting. Pony up!
                    Rick Burgess

                    I agree that solution would be better in theory, if people were to actually use it. I fear that the majority of users are used to what they perceive as free content online and will simply not pay if they don’t have to.

                    We have the paypal donate type functionality which has been around for years and has a standard (although not nice) UI but I would guess (as i have no data to back it up) that the actual donation rate is pretty low.

                    The only way I can see a tipping type service working is if there is some benefit to the user for doing so, much like subscriptions on twitch.tv for example.
                oGMo

                First you need actual content. This means not a link chain to some other site or some blathering commentary piece. Hint: If I can skip your site and find the same or very similar content in the next link down the chain, your content is worthless.

                Yes, this means doing real work. This means having something to actually say, some research or something of value you’ve actually done. Then a paywall isn’t even necessary: I’ll subscribe to you even if I block your ads. For instance, I subscribe to places like di.fm and Destructoid which provide real, actual content I can’t find elsewhere.

                If you can’t be bothered to do the work and you just have drivel that no one is even willing to see an ad to read, your “content” doesn’t deserve monetary support. However, if you have quality content, you will get support.
        pagefair

        We agree that intrusive ads are bad! In fact we highlighted this issue in a previous blog post ‘Dealing With Adblock: 5 Options That Don’t Work’. The problem is that existing alternatives are bad for both publishers (less revenue) and web users (less access to information). The ad industry is gigantic and sadly change is slow to happen.
        Justizin

        Having worked at (and left in disgust) an ad-driven company, the answer is simple and clear: The most annoying ads yield the best click-through rates, but I can’t possibly believe they yield the best consumers. Companies like Google who once tried to challenge the shittiest ad strategies are now serving them up, and many companies relying on those ads have offices full of people using AdBlock “because our fucking site doesn’t load otherwise”. I think we should organize to boycott sites with the most visually distracting and CPU intensive ads (FLASH).

        What would astound you, BTW, is that for direct sales, you can barely sign an agreement anymore without a large % of video ads, so sites with no substantial video content have to invent an excuse to have video content and TRY THEIR BEST to distract their users away from the actual site, to watch these 1:00 ads on top of :15 video clips, sometimes bought wholesale.

        It’s abhorrent and it’s a fucking ponzi scheme, but it pays. :/
    kjs3atl

    An even more important reason to run an ad blocker is that the ad networks have become very effective malware distribution mechanisms. I have huge numbers of events like the following (edited slightly for readability):

Code: Text [Select]
  1. GET /7f01baa99716452bda5bba0572c58be9/afr-zone.php HTTP/1.1::
  2.     ~~Accept: text/html, application/xhtml+xml, */*::~~
  3.     Referer: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/_uac/adpage.html::
  4.     ~~Accept-Language: en-US:: ~~
  5.     User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;Trident/5.0)::
  6.     ~~Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate::~~
  7.     Host: delivery.globalcdnnode.com::
  8.     ~~Connection: Keep-Alive::~~::~~
   See that referer? HuffPo ad launch page. That host? That’s not a CDN, it’s a malware farm registered to some guy out of RU. That GET? It eventually leads to a Darkleech exploit toolkit.

    We’ve seen these coming from all sorts of legitimate sites and ad distribution networks. We’ve had to block a couple of big ad networks in our web hygiene proxies, and they’ll likely stay blocked until they clean up their content, and that’s probably going to take a lot of big sites to make them.

    Haven’t had a single complaint from the users, tho.
    ende

    We’ve tried the same technique to detect ad blocker and then show the people an unobtrusive “Please switch off the ad blocker, that’s how we are paid”-banner. It took 3 days for the ad blockers to adjust the rules to not block the bait. It seems the only way to have even such an unobtrusive banner displayed is pay ABP for the exception.
    flamer96845312

    Good job linking to jQuery’s API when talking about JavaScript events.
    Also, if you start complaining about compatibility issues when talking about a few lines of JS, you must be quite the pro.
    Don’t write “technical” posts to attract clients when they’re only a display of how skillless you are.

    Tweets by Pagefair
    tweets

137
This could arguably also go into the jokes section...
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Blacked Out Government Websites Available Through Wayback Machine
Posted on October 2, 2013 by brewster   

Congress has caused the U.S. federal government to shut down and many important websites have gone dark.  Fortunately, we have the Wayback Machine to help.
Many sites are displaying messages that say that they are not being updated or maintained during the government shut down, and the following sites are some who have shut their doors today.  Clicking the logos will take you to a Wayback Machine archived capture of the site.    Please donate to help us keep the government websites available.
noaa.gov - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - noaa.gov
parkservice - National Park Service - nps.gov
LOClogo3 - Library of Congress - loc.gov
NSF_Logo - National Science Foundation - nsf.gov
fcc-logo - Federal Communication Commission - fcc.gov
CensusBureauSeal - Bureau of the Census - census.gov
usdalogo - U.S. Department of Agriculture - usda.gov
usgs - United States Geological Survey - usgs.gov
usitc - U.S. International Trade Commission - usitc.gov
FTC-logo - Federal Trade Commission - ftc.gov
Corporation_for_National_and_Community_Service - Corporation for National and Community Service - nationalservice.gov
trade.gov - International Trade Administration - trade.gov
 
This entry was posted in Announcements, News, Wayback Machine and tagged blackout, Wayback Machine. Bookmark the permalink.
← Celebrate at the Internet Archive — 1024 — Thursday Oct. 24th
One Response to Blacked Out Government Websites Available Through Wayback Machine

    Pingback: YSK that the Internet Archive's "Wayback Machine" has cached versions of all government websites before the shutdown. | Awesome Facts

138
Sorry for the length, but I need to explain this in context and in some kind of sequence for it to make sense.
The question I have at the end is:
How could one make best/optimum use of the potential for bulk copying (as opposed to the current piecemeal capability) to capture OCRed "Alternative Text" in a more readily accessible form than the present Clipstory html files seem to offer?

  • 1. How I came to be using ClipStory: (bear with me; this is relevant)
    On 2012-02-18 I posted a Feature request for CHS - "Detritus" database(s)
    It was not of pressing importance, and I didn't know if/how the request could be met, but it was at the back of my mind when I discovered that my can't-live-without clipboard information management tool - CHS - had somehow, without my knowing, deleted the bulk of my hard-earned Favorites that it held in its database. Fortunately my backup cycles meant that I was able to find older CHS database backups that were much larger in size than the more recent shrunken CHS database.
    Lesson learned: Monitor your critically important databases for any significant changes in size.

    However, because it was likely to be such a chore, I have procrastinated and not given myself the time to go back and see if/how I might be able to recover the Favorites from those older backups.
    So, with the "detritus" idea at the back of my mind, and having also by that stage spent some time experimenting with NirSoft's InsideClipboard, when BitsDuJour announced they were giving away Clipstory, I got a free, licensed copy. I installed it and am still using/trialling it. This was to be my de facto detritus collecting tool. I have it set up to save all stuff copied into folders (which are backed up), thus:
    • ClipStory audio files
    • ClipStory files      
    • ClipStory images    
    • ClipStory text      
    • ClipStory webpages  

    Essentially, anything you copy/cut gets saved into Clipstory (there's a max limit on file size though). The "webpages" folder saves anything copied from an html source. This means there's some doubling-up - e.g., a snippet of text copied from a web page apparently goes into the Clipstory text folder and the webpages folder - but that's OK by me as I periodically empty all the folders except the text one.
    There is also some duplication with CHS, which retains in its database the same text and images as Clipstory. However, again, that's OK by me as I periodically empty out all the images and all the text in the CHS databases - except for that text that I wish to retain, which gets flagged as "Favorite" and is kept for good and for easy access via CHS.

  • 2. How MS OneNote OCRs/captures text from images:
    If you paste/drag an image into OneNote, or if you capture a screenclip image using its superb built-in screen-clipping tool, or if you paste/drag content containing images from a web browser, into OneNote, each image gets immediately OCR-scanned and any text found by OCR is made available almost instantly in the form of copyable (and search-indexed) text - what OneNote calls "Alternative Text" or "Alt Text". This is tedious when you want to copy text from multiple images, as it needs to be done on a per image basis.
    Here's a picture of the "Alt Text" that you get if you right click-such an image: (this was a single image in a OneNote table that had several text-containing images pasted into it)

    oneNote-Clipstory OCR 01 - Alt Text.png

    I had built that table in OneNote so that I could use it in a DCForum post about buying MS Office for $9.95 as a corporate "Home Use" special deal. When I had built it, I copied the table and pasted it into irfanview (it pasted in as an image), saved the image, and that image went into the DCF post.

  • 3. What Clipstory did with the copied table:
    It saved it as an HTML file in the ClipStory webpages folder. But that's not all.
    In my housekeeping, I had deleted all the Clipstory image files, and was about to delete the HTML files, when I thought I should just take a quick look and see what I was about to delete. It was then that I discovered that Clipstory saves some stuff from OneNote that is potentially more interesting/useful than one might at first realise - viz: "Alt Text" as html code.
    I reconstructed what seems to have happened.
    When I looked through the Clipstory html files, they were all in html.

    Reconstruction: This is the html content of the file (2013-9-28 8497.html) of the copied OneNote table:
    Spoiler

Code: Text [Select]
  1. Version:1.0
  2. StartHTML:0000000105
  3. EndHTML:0000006237
  4. StartFragment:0000000539
  5. EndFragment:0000006197
  6.  
  7. <html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
  8. xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882"
  9. xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
  10.  
  11. <head>
  12. <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  13. <meta name=ProgId content=OneNote.File>
  14. <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft OneNote 15">
  15. </head>
  16.  
  17. <body lang=en-GB style='font-family:Calibri;font-size:11.0pt;color:black'>
  18. <!--StartFragment-->
  19.  
  20. <div style='direction:ltr;border-width:100%'>
  21.  
  22. <div style='direction:ltr;margin-top:0in;margin-left:0in;width:11.625in'>
  23.  
  24. <div style='direction:ltr;margin-top:0in;margin-left:0in;width:11.625in'>
  25.  
  26. <div style='direction:ltr'>
  27.  
  28. <table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 valign=top style='direction:ltr;
  29.  border-collapse:collapse;border-style:solid;border-color:#A3A3A3;border-width:
  30.  0pt'>
  31.  <tr>
  32.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  33.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  34.   <p style='margin:0in;font-family:Calibri;font-size:20.0pt;color:black;
  35.   text-align:right' lang=en-NZ><span style='font-weight:bold'>What you get
  36.   under the MS Office </span></p>
  37.   </td>
  38.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  39.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  40.   <p style='margin:0in;font-family:Calibri;font-size:20.0pt;color:black'
  41.   lang=en-NZ><span style='font-weight:bold'>2013 Home Use Program</span></p>
  42.   </td>
  43.  </tr>
  44.  <tr>
  45.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  46.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  47.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.png"
  48.   width=537 height=219
  49.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Word 2013&#38;#10;Want to create and share great-looking&#38;#10;documents that get noticed? Use galleries&#38;#10;of easy-to-use formats for r&#38;#233;sum&#38;#233;s, letters,&#38;#10;greeting cards, flyers, and more."></p>
  50.   <p style='margin:0in;font-family:Calibri;font-size:11.0pt;color:black'
  51.   lang=en-NZ>&nbsp;</p>
  52.   </td>
  53.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  54.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  55.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image002.png"
  56.   width=539 height=220
  57.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Excel 2013&#38;#10;Excels versatile tools help you analyze&#38;#10;information to make better decisions.&#38;#10;Improved charting tools and new visual&#38;#10;effects make it easier to present data and&#38;#10;highlight trends."></p>
  58.   </td>
  59.  </tr>
  60.  <tr>
  61.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  62.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  63.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image003.png"
  64.   width=540 height=215
  65.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;PowerPoint 2013&#38;#10;Get your ideas noticed. With PowerPoint&#38;#8217;s&#38;#10;new formatting and graphics features you&#38;#10;can more effectively create dynamic&#38;#10;presentations."></p>
  66.   </td>
  67.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  68.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  69.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image004.png"
  70.   width=529 height=218
  71.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Outlook 2013&#38;#10;Better manage your time and information,&#38;#10;connect across boundaries, and improve&#38;#10;email control and protection."></p>
  72.   </td>
  73.  </tr>
  74.  <tr>
  75.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  76.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  77.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image005.png"
  78.   width=535 height=215
  79.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;OneNote 2013&#38;#10;OneNote 2013 makes it easy to take flotes,&#38;#10;sketch a diagram and record a presentation,&#38;#10;all in one place. Your flotes are&#38;#10;automatically saved and searchable, and&#38;#10;they travel seam lessly to your favorite&#38;#10;devices."></p>
  80.   </td>
  81.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  82.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  83.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image006.png"
  84.   width=538 height=220
  85.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Access 2013&#38;#10;Track and report information with ease. Our&#38;#10;fluent user interface and interactive design&#38;#10;capabilities don&#38;#8217;t require deep database&#38;#10;knowledge."></p>
  86.   </td>
  87.  </tr>
  88.  <tr>
  89.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  90.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  91.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image007.png"
  92.   width=531 height=217
  93.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Publisher 2013&#38;#10;Create and distribute persuasive marketing&#38;#10;materials that reflect your brand identity."></p>
  94.   </td>
  95.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  96.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  97.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image008.png"
  98.   width=538 height=217
  99.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;InfoPath 2013&#38;#10;Easily create electronic forms to gather&#38;#10;data for projects."></p>
  100.   </td>
  101.  </tr>
  102.  <tr>
  103.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  104.   width:4.7347in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  105.   <p style='margin:0in'><img src="file:///C:\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image009.png"
  106.   width=538 height=219
  107.   alt="Machine generated alternative text:&#38;#10;Lync 2013&#38;#10;Lync 2013 is the client for Microsofts&#38;#10;enterprise-ready unified communications&#38;#10;platform. Lync connects people everywhere."></p>
  108.   </td>
  109.   <td style='border-width:0pt;background-color:#F2F2F2;vertical-align:top;
  110.   width:6.8888in;padding:2.0pt 3.0pt 2.0pt 3.0pt'>
  111.   <p style='margin:0in;font-family:Calibri;font-size:9.0pt;color:#595959'
  112.   lang=en-NZ>&nbsp;</p>
  113.   </td>
  114.  </tr>
  115. </table>
  116.  
  117. </div>
  118.  
  119. </div>
  120.  
  121. </div>
  122.  
  123. </div>
  124.  
  125. <!--EndFragment-->
  126. </body>
  127.  
  128. </html>
    [/spoiler]
    (Look at all that
"Machine generated alternative text".)

When I viewed the file with Universal Viewer, I got this:
(Click to enlarge/reduce.)
OneNote-Clipstory OCR 02 - 2013-09-28 , 20_15_18.png

That looked very familiar. The bits marked as "Machine generated alternative text" were images, and I couldn't select/copy that text, so I copied some of the (copyable) heading text "What you get under the MS Office". Then I started up OneNote and searched for that string. Found it in the table in OneNote straight away, and went back to compare the table with the view of file 2013-9-28 8497.html, but now that file looked like this:
(Click to enlarge/reduce.)
OneNote-Clipstory OCR 03 - 2013-09-28 , 20_10_42.png

After a bit of mucking about, I figured out (but am not absolutely sure) that the html was probably linked to the original in OneNote, from whence the images had been copied, but the images were inaccessible until I started up OneNote, at which point they were fetched, and (it seems) put into Temp, from where they were fetched again and inserted into the web page displayed, thus covering up the Alt Text image placeholders in the view of the html - all made possible because I had opened up OneNote.
This would seem to be consistent with OneNote's being organised something like a huge and complex wiki - it hyperlinks everything it holds in rather clever ways. Everything you do in the Notebooks is linked to date, time, and author, and material in OneNote is cross-linked internally within OneNote itself and externally to sources of material from across the internet and the client PC. Thus, if you copy anything from OneNote, the copied content will include all the relevant links related to where it was located at the time it was copied. If you move stuff around, the links are tracked and dynamically reassigned as necessary, so there is continuity and you don't easily get dead/broken links.
[/li]
[/list]

Given the above, the Clipstory html files afford the potential to do bulk copying of multiple images' text, and thus overcome the tedious per image copying referred to above. The question I have is: How could one make best/optimum use of the potential for bulk copying (as opposed to the current piecemeal capability) to capture OCRed "Alternative Text" in a more readily accessible form than the present Clipstory html files seem to offer?

139
It has really been p#ss$ng me off - the way Google, not content with making Gmail a space-wasting, glary, and eye-straining as all heck mess, then decided to arbitrarily take away the Compose page and replace it with a compulsory squidgy, cramped-up piece of rubbish. I detest being dictated to by service suppliers.
If you use Chrome/Chromium, then there is apparently an extension you can download from the app store that will restore the old-style Compose page and functionality, but there's apparently nothing similar for Firefox.

Then today I read in a Lifehacker post:
Gmail Compose Windows, Noisy Environments, and Progress Bars
...
Force Your Browser to Load the Old Gmail Compose Window
Scott shares a way to force Gmail to use the classic compose window:
  • I learned that specialized extensions that bring back the old Gmail compose window mostly work by switching the user agent to Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0). So I just downloaded the UAControl extension for Firefox, which lets you set up the user agent on a per site basis. Now whenever I am using Gmail in Firefox, I have the classic compose window!
    __________________________
If you're using Chrome instead of Firefox, you can use the extension User-Agent Switcher for Chrome to get the same effect.
_______________________

So, I downloaded/installed the Firefox add-on UAControl
Then I restarted Firefox opened the new add-on's Options panel, and added the two properties lines thus:
   mail.google.com
   Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0)
Firefox UAControl add-on - setting for Gmail Compose.png

Then I refreshed the Gmail page, pressed the stupid big red Compose button, and presto! There it was. The old-style Compose page, ergonomically rather good, with appearance and functionality returned.
Try it yourself if you want the return of the old-style Compose page.
Then you too can flip Google the bird.

140
Mini-Reviews by Members / Interfaith Explorer (FREE) - Mini-Review
« on: September 25, 2013, 08:41 PM »
Originally posted:2013-09-26
Last updated2017-02-08

Basic Info
App NameInterfaith Explorer
DescriptionReligious text repository and referencing system, available in 20 languages.
Thumbs-Up Rating :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
App URLOnline version: http://bahairesearch.com
Download the client: Interfaith Explorer
App Version ReviewedSeveral versions, up to and including v2.4.0 (current since 2013-12-30)
- trialled by me in English and also with the French plugin. There are 20 language plugins in total.
Test System SpecsMS Win7-64 Home Premium
Supported OSesPC Windows (various) andiPhones, iPods & iPads
Support MethodsRegular updates and access to feedback to/from the application developers.
Upgrade PolicyAutomatic updates.
Trial Version Available?Not applicable (This is FREEware.)
Pricing SchemeNot applicable (This is FREEware.)

Intro and Overview:
I maybe should apologise, as this review is probably long overdue. I knew I should do it, but had kept putting it off because it takes work to do that, and I am essentially lazy. However, because I thought the software was good, I have occasionally posted positive comments about Interfaith Explorer scattered over a few years' worth of discussions in the DC Forum. (If you do a search, you will find them.)

However, yesterday I made a long post about it in a Basement discussion thread, and in response, @Renegade commented:
Holy shit! ;) That looks awesome! Running out to download and check it out....
That really should be posted in the General Software forum. Looks like a very cool piece of software.
______________________

So I am guiltily rectifying matters now.
Rather than write an introduction out from scratch, here is the post from the Basement thread God's Server that I had made in response to someone else's earlier comment. This should suffice as an introduction, as long as you appreciate that context:
It is said that God is infinite, omniscient and omnipresent - and for all we know that could be true - so by definition he probably can't be "too busy". That is, there would arguably be no queuing involved.
However, that doesn't mean that you can't use computer network servers to spread the word. Previously largely a purely manual process and the domain of "holy men" (rabbis, vicars, priests, imams or their acolytes) spreading the word involved preaching to assembled congregations and reading out passages of various bibles and sacred texts for students/worshippers to recite and learn by rote.

Recite no more. Automation of the manual process and some subsequent enlightenment can now be easily distributed across the network, relatively painlessly. The best example of this that I have come across is via the Bahai faith's website - http://bahairesearch.com
There they have the online Interfaith Explorer, and you can read and cross reference the main books from the main religions.
You want it offline too? No problem. From this superbly informative website, you can download the local client application (for various languages) Interfaith Explorer
Once you have that you can read and cross reference the main books from the main religions on your laptop/PC.

Prepare to be somewhat amazed. Well worth at least an exploratory read.
I reckon that's as close as you are likely to get to an earthly God's server, until you get to go to that Ultimate Data Centre in The Cloud - so make the most of it.

[ Invalid Attachment ]
____________________________

Examples - screenshots/clips:
  • 1. A typical startup screen
    Interfaith Explorer - 05 Help menu (English Zoroastrian).jpg

    (Enlarged startup update window)
    Interfaith Explorer - 00b startup update (small).jpg

    (Main User Interface - English)
    Interfaith Explorer - 06 list of 20 languge plugins.jpg

    (Left-hand pane showing partly-opened books list)
    Interfaith Explorer - 00c startup update window.jpg

  • 2. Menu examples - French/English - different coloured backgrounds.
    Interfaith Explorer - 00d Main UI (open listing).jpg
    ________________
    Interfaith Explorer - 01b client main GUI books.png
    ________________
    Interfaith Explorer - 02 File menu (French Bahai).jpg
    ________________
    Interfaith Explorer - 03 Tools menu (English Bahai).jpg


Who this software is designed for:
Anyone who might be interested in expanding their knowledge of theology, religions, religious books/bibles and comparative theology.

The Good:
Incredibly useful and excellent collection and indexed search capability of the important religious texts from the different major/old religions of the world. Various versions/translations are provided - e.g. there are at least 6 English translations of some of the different versions of the Koran/Qur'an. There is only one version of the Christian bible  - the King James Version.

Needs Improvement:
(No notes on this as I have not seen any drawbacks in the software or its content, though I would like it to include some other religious works - e.g., Swedenborg's profound religious philosophy.)

Why I think you should use this product:
If you are interested in expanding your knowledge of theology, religions, religious books/bibles and comparative theology, then Interfaith Explorer will be of great assistance in this.
Gives you the ability to review and compare a pretty full range of biblical texts in a way that you might not otherwise have been able to do.

How it compares to similar products:
(No notes on this as I have not trialled any similar products.)

Conclusions:
  • As I said in the above quoted post.
    Prepare to be somewhat amazed. Well worth at least an exploratory read.
  • Incredibly useful, and it's FREE.
  • No-fuss, simple and quick download and installation.
Last, but not least, this software and its resources are made accessible to speakers of (so far) 20 different languages: (per http://bahairesearch.../Pages/Download.aspx)
Interfaith Explorer - 04 View menu (English Islam).jpg

141
Living Room / The JSMESS Triumph
« on: September 16, 2013, 09:55 PM »
Update from ascii.textfiles.com:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
The JSMESS Triumph — September 16, 2013
What an amazing few weeks it has been!

logo

We made improvements to improvements. We refined refinements, and refined them even more. We found shortcuts and qualities and features. And eventually, it came down to a day when an automatically running script slammed through a list of every functioning platform MESS supports and created a working or near-working JSMESS version.

More than that, we found a single line in the code, one which was meant to make the emulator work better within the browsers, but had now been producing the effect of slowing the program down. We changed a single line to say “0″ instead of “60″, and to our shock, JSMESS now runs many platforms at 100% speed.

It was a fun experience to play with a Colecovision at 70% speed in the browser. Running it at 100% speed is another experience entirely – it is, as I’d hoped, a little window where you see an entire other computer running, doing its thing, accurately showing you images and visions from decades ago but breathing as alive as if they were crafted this morning.

To celebrate, I updated the JSMESS official site, purchasing a basic theme of dynamic images and transparency (since you need to be running javascript anyway), and then jazzing it up to stress how completely fun and fast JSMESS is to work with. I also now have links to all 300 supported platforms that will be in JSMESS 1.0. Three hundred!

addWe’ve got a bunch of tasks ahead of us, but they’re rapidly becoming the kind of tasks that winners have to do, that consist of the effort of the victory lap after a draining marathon, or that weigh heavy the crown of awesome.

They include:
  • Adding a virtual keyboard so that you can hit controls and keys that aren’t on whatever keyboard you’re using. It won’t be good for arcade games, but it’ll make using the machines a lot easier.
  • Going through and matching collections of software and support materials to the 300 platforms. Luckily many use similar software or are easy to track down. It’s just a lot of them, you know?
  • Finding what slows down the remaining platforms that run under 100%, and getting rid of that. Currently, our slowest platform is the Sega Genesis, which runs at 50% speed – Sonic is taking Valium and that needs to end.
  • Sound is not activated, because the sound API we’re currently using is going to be replaced with a new one, and we’re waiting on that. It should work nicely when it’s ready, though.
  • Moving closer to a distributable package that anybody can set up on their own webservers in minutes. The great thing about Javascript in this case is we can just provide you a .js.gz file and it’ll work, wherever you are. There’s no dealing with binaries or libraries or anything – that’s the browser’s job.
I’ve been cranking away on a new demonstration page, where a dream comes true: you have screenshots of many famous programs, like Visicalc or K.C. Munchkin, and one click brings you face to face with these programs, running as they always have, full speed, and waiting for you.

I feel really bad when people ask me about this in person because I can’t shut up about it. It’s like the first time you realize what version control can do, or taking a new bike out for a spin, or discovering a great new way to walk somewhere – it’s exciting and new and the results feel infinite, far beyond what we’re laying into them. It’s a brilliant new day.

142
An interesting read on mathforum.org:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
How Technology Wrecks the Middle Class
By DAVID H. AUTOR AND DAVID DORN - August 24, 2013, 2:35 pm

Image: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images Robot arms welded a vehicle on the assembly line at a General Motors plant in Lansing, Mich., in 2010.

The Great Divide
The Great Divide is a series about inequality.
Tags: computerization, Income Inequality, Labor and Jobs, productivity, Wages and Salaries

In the four years since the Great Recession officially ended, the productivity of American workers — those lucky enough to have jobs — has risen smartly. But the United States still has two million fewer jobs than before the downturn, the unemployment rate is stuck at levels not seen since the early 1990s and the proportion of adults who are working is four percentage points off its peak in 2000.

This job drought has spurred pundits to wonder whether a profound employment sickness has overtaken us. And from there, it’s only a short leap to ask whether that illness isn’t productivity itself. Have we mechanized and computerized ourselves into obsolescence?

Are we in danger of losing the “race against the machine,” as the M.I.T. scholars Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in a recent book? Are we becoming enslaved to our “robot overlords,” as the journalist Kevin Drum warned in Mother Jones? Do “smart machines” threaten us with “long-term misery,” as the economists Jeffrey D. Sachs and Laurence J. Kotlikoff prophesied earlier this year? Have we reached “the end of labor,” as Noah Smith laments in The Atlantic?

Of course, anxiety, and even hysteria, about the adverse effects of technological change on employment have a venerable history. In the early 19th century a group of English textile artisans calling themselves the Luddites staged a machine-trashing rebellion. Their brashness earned them a place (rarely positive) in the lexicon, but they had legitimate reasons for concern.

Economists have historically rejected what we call the “lump of labor” fallacy: the supposition that an increase in labor productivity inevitably reduces employment because there is only a finite amount of work to do. While intuitively appealing, this idea is demonstrably false. In 1900, for example, 41 percent of the United States work force was in agriculture. By 2000, that share had fallen to 2 percent, after the Green Revolution transformed crop yields. But the employment-to-population ratio rose over the 20th century as women moved from home to market, and the unemployment rate fluctuated cyclically, with no long-term increase.

Labor-saving technological change necessarily displaces workers performing certain tasks — that’s where the gains in productivity come from — but over the long run, it generates new products and services that raise national income and increase the overall demand for labor. In 1900, no one could foresee that a century later, health care, finance, information technology, consumer electronics, hospitality, leisure and entertainment would employ far more workers than agriculture. Of course, as societies grow more prosperous, citizens often choose to work shorter days, take longer vacations and retire earlier — but that too is progress.

So if technological advances don’t threaten employment, does that mean workers have nothing to fear from “smart machines”? Actually, no — and here’s where the Luddites had a point. Although many 19th-century Britons benefited from the introduction of newer and better automated looms — unskilled laborers were hired as loom operators, and a growing middle class could now afford mass-produced fabrics — it’s unlikely that skilled textile workers benefited on the whole.

Fast-forward to the present. The multi-trillionfold decline in the cost of computing since the 1970s has created enormous incentives for employers to substitute increasingly cheap and capable computers for expensive labor. These rapid advances — which confront us daily as we check in at airports, order books online, pay bills on our banks’ Web sites or consult our smartphones for driving directions — have reawakened fears that workers will be displaced by machinery. Will this time be different?

A starting point for discussion is the observation that although computers are ubiquitous, they cannot do everything. A computer’s ability to accomplish a task quickly and cheaply depends upon a human programmer’s ability to write procedures or rules that direct the machine to take the correct steps at each contingency. Computers excel at “routine” tasks: organizing, storing, retrieving and manipulating information, or executing exactly defined physical movements in production processes. These tasks are most pervasive in middle-skill jobs like bookkeeping, clerical work and repetitive production and quality-assurance jobs.

Logically, computerization has reduced the demand for these jobs, but it has boosted demand for workers who perform “nonroutine” tasks that complement the automated activities. Those tasks happen to lie on opposite ends of the occupational skill distribution.

At one end are so-called abstract tasks that require problem-solving, intuition, persuasion and creativity. These tasks are characteristic of professional, managerial, technical and creative occupations, like law, medicine, science, engineering, advertising and design. People in these jobs typically have high levels of education and analytical capability, and they benefit from computers that facilitate the transmission, organization and processing of information.

On the other end are so-called manual tasks, which require situational adaptability, visual and language recognition, and in-person interaction. Preparing a meal, driving a truck through city traffic or cleaning a hotel room present mind-bogglingly complex challenges for computers. But they are straightforward for humans, requiring primarily innate abilities like dexterity, sightedness and language recognition, as well as modest training. These workers can’t be replaced by robots, but their skills are not scarce, so they usually make low wages.

Computerization has therefore fostered a polarization of employment, with job growth concentrated in both the highest- and lowest-paid occupations, while jobs in the middle have declined. Surprisingly, overall employment rates have largely been unaffected in states and cities undergoing this rapid polarization. Rather, as employment in routine jobs has ebbed, employment has risen both in high-wage managerial, professional and technical occupations and in low-wage, in-person service occupations.

So computerization is not reducing the quantity of jobs, but rather degrading the quality of jobs for a significant subset of workers. Demand for highly educated workers who excel in abstract tasks is robust, but the middle of the labor market, where the routine task-intensive jobs lie, is sagging. Workers without college education therefore concentrate in manual task-intensive jobs — like food services, cleaning and security — which are numerous but offer low wages, precarious job security and few prospects for upward mobility. This bifurcation of job opportunities has contributed to the historic rise in income inequality.

HOW can we help workers ride the wave of technological change rather than be swamped by it? One common recommendation is that citizens should invest more in their education. Spurred by growing demand for workers performing abstract job tasks, the payoff for college and professional degrees has soared; despite its formidable price tag, higher education has perhaps never been a better investment. But it is far from a comprehensive solution to our labor market problems. Not all high school graduates — let alone displaced mid- and late-career workers — are academically or temperamentally prepared to pursue a four-year college degree. Only 40 percent of Americans enroll in a four-year college after graduating from high school, and more than 30 percent of those who enroll do not complete the degree within eight years.

The good news, however, is that middle-education, middle-wage jobs are not slated to disappear completely. While many middle-skill jobs are susceptible to automation, others demand a mixture of tasks that take advantage of human flexibility. To take one prominent example, medical paraprofessional jobs — radiology technician, phlebotomist, nurse technician — are a rapidly growing category of relatively well-paid, middle-skill occupations. While these paraprofessions do not typically require a four-year college degree, they do demand some postsecondary vocational training.

These middle-skill jobs will persist, and potentially grow, because they involve tasks that cannot readily be unbundled without a substantial drop in quality. Consider, for example, the frustration of calling a software firm for technical support, only to discover that the technician knows nothing more than the standard answers shown on his or her computer screen — that is, the technician is a mouthpiece reading from a script, not a problem-solver. This is not generally a productive form of work organization because it fails to harness the complementarities between technical and interpersonal skills. Simply put, the quality of a service within any occupation will improve when a worker combines routine (technical) and nonroutine (flexible) tasks.

Following this logic, we predict that the middle-skill jobs that survive will combine routine technical tasks with abstract and manual tasks in which workers have a comparative advantage — interpersonal interaction, adaptability and problem-solving. Along with medical paraprofessionals, this category includes numerous jobs for people in the skilled trades and repair: plumbers; builders; electricians; heating, ventilation and air-conditioning installers; automotive technicians; customer-service representatives; and even clerical workers who are required to do more than type and file. Indeed, even as formerly middle-skill occupations are being “deskilled,” or stripped of their routine technical tasks (brokering stocks, for example), other formerly high-end occupations are becoming accessible to workers with less esoteric technical mastery (for example, the work of the nurse practitioner, who increasingly diagnoses illness and prescribes drugs in lieu of a physician). Lawrence F. Katz, a labor economist at Harvard, memorably called those who fruitfully combine the foundational skills of a high school education with specific vocational skills the “new artisans.”

The outlook for workers who haven’t finished college is uncertain, but not devoid of hope. There will be job opportunities in middle-skill jobs, but not in the traditional blue-collar production and white-collar office jobs of the past. Rather, we expect to see growing employment among the ranks of the “new artisans”: licensed practical nurses and medical assistants; teachers, tutors and learning guides at all educational levels; kitchen designers, construction supervisors and skilled tradespeople of every variety; expert repair and support technicians; and the many people who offer personal training and assistance, like physical therapists, personal trainers, coaches and guides. These workers will adeptly combine technical skills with interpersonal interaction, flexibility and adaptability to offer services that are uniquely human.

David H. Autor is a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. David Dorn is an assistant professor of economics at the Center for Monetary and Financial Studies in Madrid.

A version of this article appears in print on 08/25/2013, on page SR6 of the NewYork edition with the headline: How Technology Wrecks the Middle Class.

computerization, Income Inequality, Labor and Jobs, productivity, Wages and Salaries

143
I don't know if it was a connected event, but first the FF (v24) browser froze up on my laptop, and then I couldn't get anything to work. System was locked up, but the CPU fans were busy cooling the CPU.
Unable to do anything with the laptop , I switched off (reset) and rebooted the laptop, and then started up FF.

I don't know how they did it - and I think it was arguably rather naughty - but this window popped up on its own before FF had fully loaded:

Privad experiment by the Max Planck Institute 01.jpg

My first thought was "@#$! - a virus!", but then I fossicked about on the Internet and decided that it was probably genuine.
So I pressed the link at Find out more about non-tracking advertising research, which took me to http://adresearch.mpi-sws.org/ and an About page - Research on Privacy in Internet Advertising
There was an opt-out button at the bottom of the page.
Very interesting and informative (I read/skimmed one or two of the documents there).
The Overview link at the bottom was very interesting too.

So anyway, I clicked the button to participate in their experiment. No response. Nothing happened that I could see.
Then I opened a couple of their PDF docs in Google Docs Viewer, which presumably started to feed anonymous data into the experiment.

Doing a DuckDuckGo search on "Privad experiment by the Max Planck Institute", doesn't turn up an awful lot, but I did find something here: http://www.slideshar...ssvoboda16/pat-study

It was a slideshare:
Privacy, Accountability and Trust Privacy, Accountability and Trust Privacy, Accountability and Trust
by Karlos Svoboda on Jul 08, 2013
(Long and informative document text followed, and it refers to Privad several times.)

I have not found a match for the names of the people apparently involved, yet, in the documentation, but there's a lot to wade through.

EDIT: This PDF slideshow is very interesting (has 75 slides).
Privad: Privacy-Preserving Advertising details

I'm all for it.

144
Originally posted:2013-08-30
Last updated2015-02-17

Basic Info
App NameMS Office 2013 US$9.95 Corporate/Enterprise Home Use Program
Thumbs-Up Rating :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
App URLhttp://www.microsoft...r.aspx?culture=en-US
App Version ReviewedMS Office Professional
Test System SpecsMS Win7-64 Home Premium
Supported OSesWindows 7 and Mac
Support MethodsExtensive  MS Office support
Upgrade PolicyAutomatic updates for this product version.
Trial Version Available?No. (This is a special offer.)
Pricing SchemeUS$9.95
Relevant linksUseful OneNote links

Intro and Overview:
This review is about purchasing/using MS Office 2013 under Microsoft’s Home Use Program.
If you or a family member works for a company that runs MS Office as part of the corporate licensing program, then you may be eligible for Microsoft’s Home Use Program.
Per worldstart.com:
Want Microsoft Office? $9.95 Could Get You A Copy
Sunday, January 27th, 2013 by Tim

The most popular office productivity software is Microsoft Office, with millions of users in schools, businesses and at home. The major complaint of almost everyone who uses Office isn’t about the quality of the software, but the price.  The full version of Office 2013 Plus runs close to $500.  How would you like to get a completely legal official copy from Microsoft for only $10?
MS Office Professional Plus 2013 - 01 Home Use Programme.jpg

The good news is if your company runs Office as part of the corporate licensing program, you may be eligible for Microsoft’s Home Use Program. This program allows you to download a copy for only $9.95. To check if you’re eligible, contact your company’s IT department or visit the Home Use Program website by clicking here.  Click “Don’t know your program code? Click Here” and type in your work e-mail. If you are eligible, you’ll be sent an e-mail with a link to be able to purchase it at the special price.
      
The version currently offered by Home Use Program is Office 2013 Professional Plus which includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote, Access, Publisher, InfoPath and Lync. This version is the full version and does not require you to have previously owned Office and is still valid even if you end up leaving your job. This version is for home use and can be installed on two computers. It is not controlled, monitored or paid for by your companies IT department so you can use it for all of your personal needs without worrying about if it’s allowed under the company’s IT policy.

Tim

P.S. Don’t qualify? Don’t despair, you can still download for free OpenOffice which is a free office suite compatible with Microsoft Office files. While it does not have the updated Office interface or all the bells and whistles, it performs the vast majority of office suite tasks fantastically totally free.
_________________________

Description:
MS Office Professional Plus 2013 - 02 Home Use Programme.jpg

Making the purchase:
MS Office Professional Plus 2013 - 03 Home Use Programme.jpg

Who this software deal is designed for:
Home use software and licence for people who work for a company that runs MS Office as part of the corporate licensing program (Microsoft’s Home Use Program).

The Good:
Incredibly useful and excellent value for MS' leading office package.
Works fine under Windows 7.
NB: Seems to be designed for full-featured optimal use with SkyDrive and/or corporate systems under Windows 8, and using integration with latest version of Internet Explorer (e.g., for SharePoint).

Needs Improvement:
(No notes on this. This review does not evaluate the programs in the MS Office suite.)

Why I think you should use this product:
Gives you the ability to run the full range of MS Office products from home-based PCs, integrating with remote corporate systems (e.g., SharePoint, Lync, InfoPath).

How it compares to similar products:
As it says in the worldstart.com: post above:
P.S. Don’t qualify? Don’t despair, you can still download for free OpenOffice which is a free office suite compatible with Microsoft Office files. While it does not have the updated Office interface or all the bells and whistles, it performs the vast majority of office suite tasks fantastically totally free.

Conclusions:
A no-brainer for eligible purchasers.
Incredibly useful and excellent value.
Flexible licence terms.
No-fuss, simple and quick purchase/download and installation.

145
Living Room / Deliberate hamstringing of Chromecast by Google?
« on: August 28, 2013, 02:34 AM »
Rather curious incident reported by ArsTechnica. Though not famous for their journalistic rigour/objectivity, they could be pointing to something new of potential concern about the NSA's co-operative behemoth:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Chromecast could stream local files—until Google killed the feature
A developer writes that his mobile streaming app no longer works.
by Casey Johnston - Aug 26, 2013 3:00 pm UTC

Koushik Dutta demoed his app at the beginning of August. Its functionality dies with the most recent Chromecast update.
A Chromecast app that allowed users to feed local files from a mobile device directly to the Chromecast has been disabled with the most recent software update for the device. The developer of the app, Koushik Dutta, stated that his AirCast used code that had been hanging around in the Chromecast software for a while, but some new lines that Google inserted “short circuit everything but mirroring,” preventing apps that would circumvent Google-approved apps.
Per Dutta’s Google+ posts, the Chromecast extension app contains “video_playback” and “slideshow” cases that would allow the Chromecast to handle local files. Dutta reverse engineered the protocol and developed AirCast to take advantage of these capabilities and demoed the results in a video.
The latest Chromecast update now breaks that functionality with a few new lines:

Code: Text [Select]
  1. if("mirror_tab" != a) {
  2. return null;
  3. }
This code prevents “the ability to play media from external sources,” Dutta said.

It is still possible to play local files from the Chrome browser on the desktop by dragging them into a tab and streaming the tab to the Chromecast. That still leaves local files on mobile devices stuck without transfer to a PC. Dutta said that one of the sample Chromecast apps initially demonstrated mobile playback functionality, suggesting that the Chromecast was as capable of a streaming device as any “full fledged mobile computer.”

Google has not offered any public comment on why the video playback and slideshow cases were disabled, and the company did not respond immediately to requests for comment. We will update this article with more information as it becomes available.

Update: Google has provided the following statement:
   We’re excited to bring more content to Chromecast and would like to support all types of apps, including those for local content. It's still early days for the Google Cast SDK, which we just released in developer preview for early development and testing only.
   We expect that the SDK will continue to change before we launch out of developer preview, and want to provide a great experience for users and developers before making the SDK and additional apps more broadly available.
____________________________

Yeah, right.
Looks like some good old-fashioned prevarication there. There is also the use of that cliché "excited" again, which seems to often precede a major piece of bullshit from G.

146
Living Room / Greek off-the-grid Internet
« on: August 26, 2013, 12:28 AM »
Might be of interest to a few people on this forum...
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Greek community creates an off-the-grid Internet
By Joe Kloc on August 19, 2013 Email

In an effort to buck the expensive rates of unreliable corporate telecom companies, a community in Athens, Greece has created its own private Internet.

Built from a network of wireless rooftop antennas, the Athens Wireless Metropolitan Network (AWMN) now has more than 1,000 members. Data moves “through” the AWMN mesh up to 30 times faster than it does on the telecom-provided Internet.

According to Mother Jones, this off-the-grid community has become so popular in Athens and on nearby islands that it has developed its own Craigslist-esque classifieds service as well as blogs and an internal search engine.

"It's like a whole other web," AWMN user Joseph Bonicioli told the magazine. "It's our network, but it's also a playground."

The AWMN began in 2002 in response to the poor Internet service provided by traditional telecommunications companies in Athens. However, the past few years have illustrated another use for these citizen-run meshes: preserving the democratic values of the Internet.

As the Internet has become a ubiquitous presence in day-to-day life, governments around the world have sought to control it. In 2011 for example, when former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak found out that protesters were organizing on Facebook, he commanded the country’s Internet service providers to shut down access, denying 17 million Egyptians access to the Web for days.

Later that year in the U.S., the city of San Francisco temporarily shut down cellphone service in its transit system to stop a protest.

As Bonicioli told Mother Jones, "When you run your own network, nobody can shut it down."

These DIY meshes are also used to provide Internet in places major telecom companies can’t—or won’t—reach. For example, one was constructed last year in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Red Hook after Hurricane Sandy knocked out resident’s access to the networks of major Internet service providers.

Similarly, Guifi, the largest mesh in the world, was built to address spotty Internet service in rural Spain. It has over 21,000 members.

Meshes have taken on new relevance in the wake of former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s leaks about the agency’s massive Internet surveillance programs.

It is estimated (albeit roughly) that the NSA touches as much as half of the world’s Internet communications each day. The agency gains access to much of this information through partnerships with telecom companies that allow the agency to install splitters on their fibre optic Internet cables. Privately run meshes would deny the NSA—and other government intelligence agencies around the world—this access point to Internet data.

As the New America Foundation’s Sascha Meinrath told Mother Jones, "We're making infrastructure for anyone who wants to control their own network."

147
Original post date:2013-08-24
Updated:2013-08-29

Basic Info
Device NameApple Mighty Mouse - Wireless (Bluetooth) Model No.A1197
Thumbs-Up Rating :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
Device support URLN/A (obsolete device)
Device information URLhttps://en.wikipedia...i/Apple_Mighty_Mouse
Device Version ReviewedThe version used is (including some notes from Wikipedia):
  • Apple Mighty Mouse - Wireless (Bluetooth) Model No.A1197 (obsolete).
  • Release date: August 2, 2005.
  • Discontinued: October 20, 2009 (Wireless).
  • Power: 2 AA batteries.
Test System SpecsMS Win 7-64 Home Premium
Supported OSesCompatible with Win 64-bit/32-bit and Windows XP
Support MethodsDriver/software is automatically identified as the mouse device is detected.
Upgrade PolicyN/A (obsolete device) superseded by Apple Magic Mouse
Pricing SchemeN/A (obsolete device), but can be bought as secondhand - for example, on Amazon.
Pictures of the mouse:
Apple mouse - 01b Mighty Mouse Wireless (clip small).jpg   Apple mouse - 02a diagram.png

Intro and Overview:
   Wikipedia has this to say about it - at https://en.wikipedia...i/Apple_Mighty_Mouse:
  • The Mighty Mouse is made of white plastic and has a recessed Apple logo on the mouse's face. The mouse has four functional "buttons": a left capacitive sensor, a right capacitive sensor, a track ball with a pressure sensor and side squeeze sensors. The track ball enables users to scroll a page or document in any direction, including diagonally. Two of the above-mentioned inputs are not physical buttons. Rather, the touch-sensitive topshell (mentioned below) and the pressure sensing trackball allow the mouse to detect which side is being touched or whether the trackball is being held in.

  • The mouse emits a sound when the scroll ball is rolled, but this is not a direct product of the ball moving; the sound is actually produced by a tiny speaker inside the mouse.[2] There is no way to disable this feature other than physically disabling the speaker inside the mouse. [3]

  • Currently, Mac OS X is the only operating system that fully supports the mouse without third party software. When used with Mac OS X, the sensors can be set to launch applications or trigger features of the Apple operating system, such as Dashboard and Exposé. If not used with Mac OS X, the mouse behaves as a four "button" mouse with a vertical and horizontal scroll wheel. There are third-party drivers (XMouse,[4] AppleM[5]) that provide more functions to users of other platforms such as Windows.

  • The Mighty Mouse does not report whether the right and left sensors are activated simultaneously. In fact, it reports a right-click only when there is no finger contact on the left side of the mouse. Thus a right-click requires lifting the finger off the mouse, then right-clicking. This also means that the Mighty Mouse cannot support mouse chording, used by CAD software, games, and other applications where multiple functions are mapped to the mouse.
    ____________________________

I got hold of this mouse because a neighbour of mine was throwing out some stuff, and I offered to take it to the local Mission Charity shop - I regularly take all sorts of discarded but still useful stuff there (typically a car trunkfull a week), and they sell it in their various outlet stores.
On inspection, amongst my neighbour's stuff was this apple mouse. Interested, I opened it up, and saw that a sprung stainless steel piece on the inside had come away from where it was supposed to be and that it couldn't work until that was fixed. I stuck it back in place with some hot glue, popped in 2 AA battaries, enabled wifi Bluetooth on my laptop, switched on the mouse, and told the laptop to look for and acquire Bluetooth devices - which it did, and installed the appropriate drivers after a short delay:
Apple mouse - 03 Bluetooth device acquired.png

The properties checked out:
Apple mouse - 04 properties.png

- and it showed up in my Bluetooth devices list:
Apple mouse - 05a Bluetooth devices.png

The mouse was now operational, and I began to use it to see what it was like.
I have to say here that:
  • (a)  I don't usually like to use a mouse as it aggravates an old carpal tunnel injury (RSI). I prefer to use a touchpad and the keyboard a lot, as a mouse is just too tediously slow for my liking anyway.
  • (b) I have studied and applied ergonomic design principles in time and motion studies and computer interface design, and having had problems with my back since teenage years, and learning to safely weight-train despite that, I am now automatically acutely aware of good and bad ergonomics in anything to do with human movement, man-machine interfaces and printed and audio-video media.
    ____________________________

So what was the mouse like to use? I thought it a superb example of intelligent ergonomic design. Very nice to use.

Technical Features and Operation: (mostly from Wikipedia)
Repeated from above: There are third-party drivers (XMouse,[4] AppleM[5]) that provide more functions to users of other platforms such as Windows.

Features:
  • Touch-sensitive top shell
  • 360 degree enabled clickable track ball
  • Force-sensing side "squeeze" areas
  • Optical (LED) tracking in wired version
  • Laser tracking in wireless version
  • Compatible with Macintosh, Windows and Linux PCs
  • Programmable functions for the four "buttons"
  • Auditory feedback with built-in speaker[8][9]

Who this mouse is designed for:
People who might need or like to have an improved ergonomic interface with their computer.

The Good:
Seems like a very good, well-designed and well-manufactured product.

The needs improvement section:
I can't really fault it, so far, but Wikipedia says:
Although the Mighty Mouse can sense both right and left clicks, it is not possible to press both sensors simultaneously. The user must learn to lift the left finger off the sensor surface before attempting a right-mouse click.[10]
The scroll ball will eventually become clogged with dust and require cleaning. While there are methods to clean the ball without dismantling the mouse some users have complained that the Mighty Mouse is difficult to clean because the scroll ball mechanism is hard to take apart.[11][12]

Why I think you should use this product:
If you use a mouse a lot, this mouse could well make your computer use easier/more comfortable.

How it compares to similar mice:
Since I don't really like using a mouse, I did not try this one out for very long. I reckon that, despite it's design age (2005), it could still be ahead of many current mouse designs, and the cost would be low (you should be able to pick it up for a song).
However, real mouse users might have more useful opinions. For example: (per comments below)
  • @mouser: I tried one of these mice once, and was driven crazy by the lack of good tactile feedback on the left and right mouse buttons.
    yech, not for me.
  • @lanux128: as interesting as this review is, i prefer Logitech mice which comes in all shapes and sizes with superior (imo) ergonomic features.

Conclusions:
I really like this mouse, but would not be likely to use it much for myself. I would like to see if my daughter could take advantage of it instead of her Logitech wireless mouse (which is an excellent mouse), but unfortunately she has no Bluetooth functionality on her laptop. So I will probably not keep the mouse.
In light of @lanux128's comment, I might post a review of my daughter's Logitech M515 ("Couch") Mouse.

Links to other info sources/reviews of this application:
Just the Wikipedia link above, though a DuckDuckGo search turns up a lot of references to this mouse.

148
I have been trialling Locate32 (latest 64-bit version) for a while, and yesterday I was puzzled because some files that I had just created and that would have been indexed by Locate32 in its latest database update were not showing up in Locate32's results page. At the same time I got an error - which was not repeatable.

I wrote to the developer of Locate32 per email:
​I was using Locate32 and searching for files/folders named ..Audio
After sorting the results list, I got this error message:
CLocateDlg::SortNewItem:Something is wrong! Contact jmhuttun@{redacted}
I have established that Locate32 seems to be unable to catalogue/index folders with a preceding dot (.) or preceding two dots (..) in the folder name, and it cannot seem to catalogue/index the files within such folders either.
System is Win7-64 Home Premium.

He replied:
​Looks like that you are trying to something strange. I should recommend not using '.', because it's meaning is quite vague in GUI programs.

However, I see nothing strange about it. Windows File System allows for preceding 1 or more full stops in file/folder names and quite a lot of programs use at least 1 preceding full stop in file-naming - e.g. Google Picasa. I have been using folder names with preceding dot(s) (.) for years with no issue until now - and my File Manager is xplorer² (I rarely - if ever - need to use Windows Explorer).

This is an example of a typical filename and path that seems to be causing difficulty for Locate32:
C:\Workdata.007 (Media 1)\..Audio\Personal + Family\2012-01-31 224456 - Meeting notes at Labour MP office (9m 48s).amr

Puzzled, I did a comparison, using different tools to do the searching:
  • 1. Using the FIND command for files/folders in Windows Explorer and also using Regex ".*.*" or "..*.*" seems to indicate that it is partially blind. That is, it:
    (a) can find non-specific folders with preceding full stops (1 or 2) with no problem, but
    (b) cannot find a specific ..foldername or specific filename.ext within that ..foldername, but
    (c) can find files with specific .ext but a non-specific filename within those folders;
    (d) can find a specific or non-specific foldername within those folders.

  • 2. Using Locate32, it cannot seem to find those specific ..foldername folders, nor non-specific ones, and cannot find any files - specific or non-specific - within those ..foldername folders. It seems to be "blind" to the ..foldername and any files/folders nested within it.

  • 3. Using FIND in xplorer², it can find specific and non-specific ..foldername folders and any files/folders (specific or non-specific) nested within them, with no difficulty.

Q1: Am I doing something wrong here, or have I tripped over some kind of a bug in Windows and Locate32?

I rather like Locate32 because it is fast, but if it fails to actually catalogue certain undefined and apparently legitimate types of file/folder names in NTFS without your knowledge, then I shall have to use an alternative, or go back to using xplorer² (which, though it seems to be fail-proof in this context, is slower, as it does a real-time search the first time you search for something). If I can possibly avoid it, I certainly don't want to have to change my long-established folder-naming conventions to accommodate Locate32.

Q2. What alternatives are there to Locate32 that would not have this ..foldername problem?

(Thanks in anticipation.)

149
Apologies for any duplication if this has already been posted in DCF.

Nifty tip from Labnol.org: How to Copy the Command Output to Windows Clipboard

Just use the Pipe (|) and "clip"

Example:
Typing dir | clip at the Command prompt puts the directory list into the Clipboard, or directly into CHS (Clipboard Help & Spell) if you are using it.

150
Fascinating example of what rather looks like a case of corporate Fascism at work in attempted censorship of the Internet:
I saw this at torrentfreak.com:
(Excerpt copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
DMCA Abuse Will Cause Censored Product Review to Go Viral
Andy     July 31, 2013

A manufacturer of studio lighting is about to discover that censoring critics is a very bad idea indeed. After a filmmaker published a less-than-glowing review of one of their products, UK-based Rotolight deliberately abused the DMCA to have the video removed from Vimeo on copyright grounds. But far from hiding the contents away, there are now signs that the review – and subsequent takedown – will become a prime example of the Streisand Effect. ...
______________________

After what seems to have been a lot of mucking about, both the review and the Vimeo video have been reinstated in full, together with relevant comment, at the F-stopAcademy blog:
Censorship? Copyright Infringement used by manufacturer to remove a comparison video…Reinstated!

There are some noteworthy points that occur to me and from the blog post and readers' subsequent comments:
  • Frustration of the consumer's "perfect knowledge": There is a concept in economics of the perfect market, wherein consumers have "perfect knowledge" of all products/services in the market and can make informed price-performance comparisons on which to base their rational buying decisions. It would appear as though the manufacturer (Rotolight Ltd.) of the Rotolight Anova lamp had decided to take a censorious, litigious and nasty approach to conceal the unfavourable test results from potential consumers. The author (Den Lennie) of the review mentions that he intends to retest the lamp, presumably as a mark of good faith. However, given that Rotolight Ltd. took the approach that they did, then that would seem to belie the rationality of retesting the product. That is, if Rotolight had thought their Anova lamp could have come out better in a retest (say, if the initial test had used a defective lamp), then they could easily have requested the retest at their expense, rather than take the approach that they did. The fact that they chose to take the latter approach (apparently even going so far as to posting comment and then deleting it on Lennie's Facebook page) would seem to indicate that they knew full well that a retest would not show up anything different.

  • Consumer voice: The Internet has gone a long way towards realising the concept of "perfect knowledge" in the marketplace, and consumers who objected to the likes of Rotolight Ltd. and attempts to keep them in ignorance through censorship could do worse than signal their displeasure by a boycott of products from Rotolight Ltd., as an indication of consumer voice and power.

  • Online video streaming service providers have legal obligations: to respect Trademarks or claims to invasion of privacy/invasion of publicity/commercial libel. They must act upon these grounds not only as a matter of law but within their own terms of service. The D.M.C.A. is just one tool in the toolkit of managing rights, focused upon copyright law, and there are others. They act in the same way when a DMCA notice form is filed.
    However, in this case, the takedown was over an apparently false claim of copyright and trademark use by Rotolight Ltd. Vimeo must have realised this, because they re-instated the video without Lennie issuing a counterclaim to force the issue, and he says that his legal team advised that "Vimeo wouldn’t have acted independently, to avoid legal repercussions. Rotolight must have told Vimeo they were backing down."

  • Dishonesty on the part of the manufacturer/vendor: As Lennie says, "They had no grounds for claiming copyright or trademark infringement.", so the claim(s) would presumably have been stated knowing that they were false/untrue. The correct term for this would be "lying". From experience and as a general rule, this sort of thing would typically be a result of incompetence and dishonesty at top management level, but could not usually exist without there being a general incubating culture of incompetence/dishonesty in the organisation. In any event, it can be a relatively common mark of a "toxic" corporate culture.

  • A learning experience: The Streisand Effect is usually seen where things backfire against your actions, drawing huge attention to the very thing you might have been so desperately trying to conceal. In this case we have not only seen that, but also seen a salutary reminder of the sanctity of consumers' rights and the consumers' market "franchise" and of the need for maintaining these things, and of the need for vigilance and improved transparency and ethics in business. This is potentially a lesson for all of us. I suspect that this will have been a good learning experience all round - "the Rotolight Anova case study".
__________________________

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16next