I just wanted to give an opinion, and a real life example of what the software could lack to
some users,not fight with the developer...

For me the restoration is a normal process of a backup scheme, and my needs don't include system backup
with such an inadequate tool, i use mirrofolder and paragon softwares for that

But in my case, i need to retain ntfs attributes, like ownership, access and creation time etc, and to restore them
along with the file if needed. So yes, i need arestore stuff, and people like me must be numerous.

So i'll stick with the backup system i use now, until delta copy finally arrives in syncback,
and i'll be happy camper then, but i wished to have find a good software FOR WHAT I WANT TO DO

This does simply not fit my needs.

If often backup huge files (steam folder is an example) and i liked the idea to have a delta copy tool (superflexible has delta
but is a pain to get restoration easy, and i don't use it anymore for ages).

In the steam example, ntfs attributes is not important, which is not the case of all my backup jobs,
and continuous backup is irrelevant for a game folder.

The only tool which contains all features is mirrorfolder, but it's not usable in
the way i backup.

So i'm stuck in waiting a long time for my files to be safe.

Maybe one day....

I tried Bvkup because of the delta feature, which is the only that my
favorite backup program is lacking, SyncBackPro.

I must be totally stupid, but i did not find the restore feature.
What's the point of backing up without the possibility to
restore? I'm used of backing up ntfs attributes, so i can
not simply copy back files to their original location.

If someone can point me out the solution.