551
General Software Discussion / Re: Ipod Recovery Program
« on: April 14, 2010, 08:42 PM »
IiPod recovery program - for recovering iPod users.
My name is Bob and I'm an iPodoholic.
My name is Bob and I'm an iPodoholic.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
IBuying the iPad as a book reader would be ridiculous. Of course, I don't think that is what you were suggesting, and the review certainly isn't either, but I've heard/seen it suggested enough to feel compelled to comment.-Darwin (April 06, 2010, 10:28 PM)
You should also check out ClipName http://www.mainsoft.fr/en/downloads.htm
We also use ExecParm from the same site.-kwacky1 (March 05, 2010, 04:11 AM)
If you are on the USA. Extortion is one of the pillars of our society. Just look at the IRS, one might think they invented it-rxantos (February 25, 2010, 08:24 PM)
ut actually I was favorably surprised by another point, the mp3 encoder. I used to rely on EasyCDDA, encoding my CD @ 192 kbps ABR. With Jetaudio Plus I chose 192 kbps VBR and I was astonished by the difference (on the same Sony Walkman, a NWZ-S738F). The music seems "clearer", "richer" than with EasyCDDA with a similar compression level.Hm, couldn't find mention of which MP3 encoding engine EasyCDDA uses; the closest "official" info I found in any obvious place was a link to mp3dev.org, which seems to be an old site for LAME? - some review does say it uses LAME, though. And afaik, LAME is pretty much the highest-quality encoder on the market?-MerleOne (January 12, 2010, 04:56 AM)
JetAudio doesn't mention it's codec either, but a 2007 thread on their forum implies Fraunhofer... I hope that they've either changed codec since, or that Fraunhofer has improved their codec, since it used to have worse quality (except for very low bitrates, but who use 96kbps for their audio? )-f0dder (January 12, 2010, 06:12 AM)
Writemonkey bears an uncanny cultural resemblance to the DOS-based XYWrite wordprocessor. XYWrite, in turn, was based on the ATEX word processing program which ran on mainframes way back when. ATEX was the wordprocessor for its time. ATEX was used extensively by major news agencies and newspaper publishers such as the New York Times.-40hz (December 22, 2009, 06:54 PM)
My desires are:I can agree with points 2-4, but why are you so hung up on the idea of a physical 8.5x11 screen? The only thing I can think of is that you might want to trace images from the screen onto a standard letter sized sheet of paper.
- 8.5x11" Screen
- Native PDF rendering
- Reasonably fast page turning
- Basic ability to add notations
-mouser (December 29, 2009, 03:53 PM)
This is the only tech product i've really been craving badly for years.. I've been waiting so long to be able to read full sized 8.5x11" academic papers.. This just can't come fast enough for me.-mouser (December 29, 2009, 06:28 AM)