Messages - mistercz [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1] 2next
1
Thanks for stoping by. This seems to be resolved on the homepage but I still encounter this redirection issue when visiting the forum (Here for example: Board index » System Explorer » SystemExplorer - Development » Minor Nit).
There must be something wrong. What internet browser do you use ? There are flash ads on forum, but no redirection. User must click to banner for navigating to ads address. Could you please write more details about this issue ?

Also, is Systemexplorer a private project? I ask this because I noticed some files are hosted @ http://se.xacti.com/se/beta/.
SystemExplorer is private project. Download count of SystemExplorer 1.4 was too high for our hosting provider. So, we must have files for download hosted on some alternative download server. XACTI is hosting our files for free.

2
2PhilB66: I tried add some ads to our System Explorer homepage. Your visit was maybe on same time as maintainance of my homepage. Sorry for problems.

3
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: March 07, 2008, 05:08 AM »
New version of System Explorer was released! Feel free to visit product homepage at http://systemexplorer.mistergroup.org.

4
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 23, 2008, 12:44 AM »
I did notice that some applications that are definitely safe are shown as "Suspicious" or "Very Suspicious".  As for how else to determine a proper score, I have no idea how to do that.  However other explorer/system info programs don't designate these as Suspicious.
The every safe process should have informations about developer or product. That's why are processes without this informations marked as "suspicious"..

There's many safe application without this informations in real world, but I hope it will change.

We want to improve this feature in future versions..maybe add black list of malware processes...

5
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 22, 2008, 01:02 PM »
What kind of method are you using to determine the safety of a given file? Checking up if certain details are present in the file (name of the product, developer...), or something more complex?

There are few basic rules in actual version. Will be improved in future.

Rules:
1) Process running from %windir%\system32 with no Company Name or no Product Name has 0%
2) Process without Sign Certificate -10%
3) Process without Company Name -20%
4) Process without Product Name -20%

If you have any suggestions, Let me know. Thanks

Pages: [1] 2next
Go to full version